Index: printing/printing_context_mac.mm |
diff --git a/printing/printing_context_mac.mm b/printing/printing_context_mac.mm |
index a8e4fa048d4a1bfdde5908762788d363e08258b7..6b09a94c28520e8cfe0dcb3746dc3b7ffea6608b 100644 |
--- a/printing/printing_context_mac.mm |
+++ b/printing/printing_context_mac.mm |
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ |
#include "base/logging.h" |
#include "base/mac/scoped_cftyperef.h" |
+#include "base/mac/scoped_nsexception_enabler.h" |
#include "base/sys_string_conversions.h" |
#include "base/values.h" |
#include "printing/print_settings_initializer_mac.h" |
@@ -36,6 +37,15 @@ void PrintingContextMac::AskUserForSettings(gfx::NativeView parent_view, |
int max_pages, |
bool has_selection, |
PrintSettingsCallback* callback) { |
+ // Third-party print drivers seem to be an area prone to raising exceptions. |
+ // This will allow exceptions to be raised, but does not handle them. |
stuartmorgan
2011/05/17 18:52:14
I don't understand. Why would we *deliberately* al
Scott Hess - ex-Googler
2011/05/17 19:34:40
The primary benefit of making NSExceptions fatal i
|
+ // TODO(shess): Some experimentation indicates that uncaught exceptions can |
+ // leave the print panel up, and any use after the exception will almost |
+ // certainly crash on access to zombie objects, but simply _catching_ the |
+ // exception doesn't resolve the problem, because you cannot easily dismiss |
+ // the print panel from code. This situation doesn't seem right, to me. |
+ base::mac::ScopedNSExceptionEnabler enabler(true); |
+ |
DCHECK([NSThread isMainThread]); |
// We deliberately don't feed max_pages into the dialog, because setting |