Make this into a WebApp instead of an extension.

Make this into a WebApp instead of an extension.

BUG=none
TEST=NTP has app icon.

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=84727

[Jamie, 2011-05-10 00:00:27]

http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
File remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json:11: "16": "chromoting.png",
The existing icon is 20x20, not 16x16. In fact, I don't think it's worth keeping
it anyway, at least until we have icons optimized for those resolutions, at
which point we might want to investigate including a 48x48 icon as well.

[awong, 2011-05-10 00:19:40]

I updated it to 20x20, but I'm betting no one's going to use that.

-Albert

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:00 PM, <jamiewalch@chromium.org> wrote:

>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
> File remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json (right):
>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
> remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json:11: "16": "chromoting.png",
> The existing icon is 20x20, not 16x16. In fact, I don't think it's worth
> keeping it anyway, at least until we have icons optimized for those
> resolutions, at which point we might want to investigate including a
> 48x48 icon as well.
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/
>

[jamiewalch, 2011-05-10 00:23:40]

Why not get rid of it altogether?
http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/manifest.html advises against
using sizes other than 128, 48 and 16, and 16 doesn't sound like it's
going to be useful for us.

Jamie

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
<ajwong@chromium.org> wrote:
> I updated it to 20x20, but I'm betting no one's going to use that.
> -Albert
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:00 PM, <jamiewalch@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
>> File remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json (right):
>>
>>
>>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
>> remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json:11: "16": "chromoting.png",
>> The existing icon is 20x20, not 16x16. In fact, I don't think it's worth
>> keeping it anyway, at least until we have icons optimized for those
>> resolutions, at which point we might want to investigate including a
>> 48x48 icon as well.
>>
>> http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/
>
>

[awong, 2011-05-10 00:35:10]

done.

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Jamie Walch <jamiewalch@google.com> wrote:

> Why not get rid of it altogether?
> http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/manifest.html advises against
> using sizes other than 128, 48 and 16, and 16 doesn't sound like it's
> going to be useful for us.
>
> Jamie
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
> <ajwong@chromium.org> wrote:
> > I updated it to 20x20, but I'm betting no one's going to use that.
> > -Albert
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:00 PM, <jamiewalch@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
> >> File remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json (right):
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/diff/1/remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest...
> >> remoting/webapp/me2mom/manifest.json:11: "16": "chromoting.png",
> >> The existing icon is 20x20, not 16x16. In fact, I don't think it's worth
> >> keeping it anyway, at least until we have icons optimized for those
> >> resolutions, at which point we might want to investigate including a
> >> 48x48 icon as well.
> >>
> >> http://codereview.chromium.org/6995003/
> >
> >
>

[Jamie, 2011-05-10 00:38:05]

LGTM