Get remoting units working correctly.

Get remoting units working correctly.

And make them easier to read.


BUG=NONE
TEST=Run remoting.

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=86646

[dmac, 2011-05-25 17:06:19]

PTAL.

[garykac, 2011-05-25 17:09:16]

On 2011/05/25 17:06:19, dmac wrote:
> PTAL.

LGTM

[Sergey Ulanov, 2011-05-25 18:29:06]

being a pedant: should we use KiBps and MiBps instead (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_rate_units)?

[Wez, 2011-05-25 18:40:00]

Is there a reason why we want to report bandwidth in Ki[lo/bi]Bytes per second
rather than Ki[lo/bi]bits?  Network throughputs are normally expressed using the
latter, so it seems more useful for us to do the same here.

[dmaclach1, 2011-05-25 18:44:12]

Because people who care will be aware of the difference between KB and
Kb, and I don't want people who don't know the what a Kb is freaking
out thinking we are shipping 8 times more info across the line than we
are...

Maybe it's just because I think better in bytes than bits myself...
I'm going to leave it for now. If someone truly cares, patches happily
accepted.

Cheers,
Dave

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:40,  <wez@chromium.org> wrote:
> Is there a reason why we want to report bandwidth in Ki[lo/bi]Bytes per
> second
> rather than Ki[lo/bi]bits?  Network throughputs are normally expressed using
> the
> latter, so it seems more useful for us to do the same here.
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6992069/
>

[awong, 2011-05-25 18:53:29]

Danger! Danger!  Bikeshed alert!

If you want to change it, push up a CL.

-Albert


On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, <wez@chromium.org> wrote:

> Is there a reason why we want to report bandwidth in Ki[lo/bi]Bytes per
> second
> rather than Ki[lo/bi]bits?  Network throughputs are normally expressed
> using the
> latter, so it seems more useful for us to do the same here.
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6992069/
>