Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(31)

Issue 6933048: Tiny refactorings to improve the readability of the compiler pipeline a bit. (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 7 months ago by Sven Panne
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Tiny refactorings to improve the readability of the compiler pipeline a bit. Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=7802

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+25 lines, -31 lines) Patch
M src/compiler.cc View 3 chunks +25 lines, -31 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Sven Panne
9 years, 7 months ago (2011-05-06 10:00:35 UTC) #1
Kevin Millikin (Chromium)
LGTM. http://codereview.chromium.org/6933048/diff/1/src/compiler.cc File src/compiler.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/6933048/diff/1/src/compiler.cc#newcode116 src/compiler.cc:116: static bool is_debugging_active() { I prefer debugging_is_active as ...
9 years, 7 months ago (2011-05-06 10:51:31 UTC) #2
Sven Panne
9 years, 7 months ago (2011-05-06 11:01:06 UTC) #3
http://codereview.chromium.org/6933048/diff/1/src/compiler.cc
File src/compiler.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/6933048/diff/1/src/compiler.cc#newcode116
src/compiler.cc:116: static bool is_debugging_active() {
On 2011/05/06 10:51:31, Kevin Millikin wrote:
> I prefer debugging_is_active as a name, but I don't care too much either :)

I don't have very strong feelings about this, either, but I think it's
consistent with the rest of the is_blah()-predicates. :-)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698