Refactor preference syncing.

chrome/browser/prefs/pref_model_associator.cc

+// Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/prefs/pref_model_associator.h"
+
+#include "base/json/json_reader.h"
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/utf_string_conversions.h"
+#include "base/values.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/profiles/profile.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/sync/engine/syncapi.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/sync/glue/generic_change_processor.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/sync/profile_sync_service.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/sync/protocol/preference_specifics.pb.h"
+#include "chrome/common/pref_names.h"
+#include "content/browser/browser_thread.h"
+#include "content/common/json_value_serializer.h"
+#include "content/common/notification_service.h"
+
+PrefModelAssociator::PrefModelAssociator()
+    : pref_service_(NULL),
+      sync_service_(NULL),
+      preferences_node_id_(sync_api::kInvalidId),
+      models_associated_(false),
+      processing_syncer_changes_(false),
+      processing_syncapi_changes_(false),

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

could we combine these into a single "processing_changes_" bool?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

I don't think so. They get reset in different places and its possible for one
place it gets set to call the other.

+      change_processor_(NULL) {
+}
+
+PrefModelAssociator::PrefModelAssociator(
+    PrefService* pref_service)
+    : pref_service_(pref_service),
+      sync_service_(NULL),
+      preferences_node_id_(sync_api::kInvalidId),
+      models_associated_(false),
+      processing_syncer_changes_(false),
+      processing_syncapi_changes_(false),
+      change_processor_(NULL) {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+  registrar_.Add(this,
+                 NotificationType::PROFILE_SYNC_SERVICE_LOADING,

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

Are we sure we always get this? That there is no race where the PSS could be
created first?  Should we assert?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Not used anymore.

+                 NotificationService::AllSources());
+}
+
+PrefModelAssociator::~PrefModelAssociator() {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+  change_processor_ = NULL;
+  sync_service_ = NULL;
+  pref_service_ = NULL;
+}
+void PrefModelAssociator::Observe(NotificationType type,
+                                  const NotificationSource& source,
+                                  const NotificationDetails& details) {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+  DCHECK_EQ(NotificationType::PROFILE_SYNC_SERVICE_LOADING, type.value);
+  ProfileSyncService* sync_service_source =
+      Source<ProfileSyncService>(source).ptr();
+  DCHECK(sync_service_source);
+  if (sync_service_source->profile()->GetPrefs() != pref_service_)
+    return;  // This is a different profile;
+  DCHECK(!sync_service_);
+  sync_service_ = sync_service_source;
+  sync_service_->RegisterModelAssociator(this);

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

Could we registrar_.RevokeAll at this point?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

n/a.

+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::InitPrefNodeAndAssociate(
+    sync_api::WriteTransaction* trans,
+    const sync_api::BaseNode& root,
+    const PrefService::Preference* pref) {
+  DCHECK(pref);
+
+  base::JSONReader reader;
+  std::string tag = pref->name();
+  sync_api::WriteNode node(trans);
+  if (node.InitByClientTagLookup(syncable::PREFERENCES, tag)) {
+    // The server has a value for the preference.
+    const sync_pb::PreferenceSpecifics& preference(
+        node.GetPreferenceSpecifics());
+    DCHECK_EQ(tag, preference.name());
+
+    if (pref->IsUserModifiable()) {

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

It might be a bit cleaner to do
if (!IsUserModifiable()) {
  Associate(...);
  return true;
}

// do the rest

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+      scoped_ptr<Value> value(
+          reader.JsonToValue(preference.value(), false, false));
+      std::string pref_name = preference.name();
+      if (!value.get()) {
+        LOG(ERROR) << "Failed to deserialize preference value: "
+                   << reader.GetErrorMessage();
+        return false;
+      }
+
+      // Merge the server value of this preference with the local value.
+      scoped_ptr<Value> new_value(MergePreference(*pref, *value));
+
+      // Update the local preference based on what we got from the
+      // sync server.
+      if (new_value->IsType(Value::TYPE_NULL)) {
+        pref_service_->ClearPref(pref_name.c_str());
+      } else if (!new_value->IsType(pref->GetType())) {
+        LOG(WARNING) << "Synced value for " << preference.name()
+                     << " is of type " << new_value->GetType()
+                     << " which doesn't match pref type " << pref->GetType();
+      } else if (!pref->GetValue()->Equals(new_value.get())) {
+        pref_service_->Set(pref_name.c_str(), *new_value);
+      }
+
+      AfterUpdateOperations(pref_name);
+
+      // If the merge resulted in an updated value, write it back to
+      // the sync node.
+      if (!value->Equals(new_value.get()) &&
+          !WritePreferenceToNode(pref->name(), *new_value, &node))
+        return false;
+    }
+    Associate(pref, node.GetId());
+  } else if (pref->IsUserControlled()) {
+    // The server doesn't have a value, but we have a user-controlled value,
+    // so we push it to the server.
+    sync_api::WriteNode write_node(trans);
+    if (!write_node.InitUniqueByCreation(syncable::PREFERENCES, root, tag)) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Failed to create preference sync node.";
+      return false;
+    }
+
+    // Update the sync node with the local value for this preference.
+    if (!WritePreferenceToNode(pref->name(), *pref->GetValue(), &write_node))
+      return false;
+
+    Associate(pref, write_node.GetId());
+  }

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

maybe a comment for the implicit 'else' case here?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::AssociateModels() {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+
+  int64 root_id;
+  if (!GetSyncIdForTaggedNode(kPreferencesTag, &root_id)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+               << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  sync_api::WriteTransaction trans(sync_service_->GetUserShare());
+  sync_api::ReadNode root(&trans);
+  if (!root.InitByIdLookup(root_id)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+               << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  for (std::set<std::string>::iterator it = synced_preferences_.begin();
+       it != synced_preferences_.end(); ++it) {
+    std::string name = *it;
+    const PrefService::Preference* pref =
+        pref_service_->FindPreference(name.c_str());
+    VLOG(1) << "Associating preference " << name;
+    DCHECK(pref);
+    if (!pref->IsUserModifiable())
+      continue;  // We don't sync preferences the user cannot change.
+    InitPrefNodeAndAssociate(&trans, root, pref);
+  }
+  models_associated_ = true;
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::DisassociateModels() {
+  id_map_.clear();
+  id_map_inverse_.clear();
+  models_associated_ = false;

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

does it make sense to clear / reset anything else here, like
processing_changes_?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Rest should be remain, as they're set before AssociateModels().

+  return true;
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::SyncModelHasUserCreatedNodes(bool* has_nodes) {
+  DCHECK(has_nodes);
+  *has_nodes = false;
+  int64 preferences_sync_id;
+  if (!GetSyncIdForTaggedNode(kPreferencesTag, &preferences_sync_id)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+               << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+    return false;
+  }
+  sync_api::ReadTransaction trans(sync_service_->GetUserShare());
+
+  sync_api::ReadNode preferences_node(&trans);
+  if (!preferences_node.InitByIdLookup(preferences_sync_id)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+               << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  // The sync model has user created nodes if the preferences folder has any
+  // children.
+  *has_nodes = sync_api::kInvalidId != preferences_node.GetFirstChildId();
+  return true;
+}
+
+int64 PrefModelAssociator::GetSyncIdFromChromeId(
+    const std::string& preference_name) {
+  PreferenceNameToSyncIdMap::const_iterator iter =
+      id_map_.find(preference_name);
+  return iter == id_map_.end() ? sync_api::kInvalidId : iter->second;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::Associate(
+    const PrefService::Preference* preference, int64 sync_id) {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+
+  std::string name = preference->name();
+  DCHECK_NE(sync_api::kInvalidId, sync_id);
+  DCHECK_EQ(0U, id_map_.count(name));
+  DCHECK_EQ(0U, id_map_inverse_.count(sync_id));
+  id_map_[name] = sync_id;
+  id_map_inverse_[sync_id] = name;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::Disassociate(int64 sync_id) {
+  DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
+  SyncIdToPreferenceNameMap::iterator iter = id_map_inverse_.find(sync_id);

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

do we actually use id_map_inverse_ anywhere?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Aside from here, no. There's a higher level todo though to remove the id_map in
general, since the preference tags are the pref names themselves, and that
should be all we need.

+  if (iter == id_map_inverse_.end())
+    return;
+  id_map_.erase(iter->second);
+  id_map_inverse_.erase(iter);
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::GetSyncIdForTaggedNode(const std::string& tag,
+                                                 int64* sync_id) {
+  sync_api::ReadTransaction trans(sync_service_->GetUserShare());
+  sync_api::ReadNode sync_node(&trans);
+  if (!sync_node.InitByTagLookup(tag.c_str()))
+    return false;
+  *sync_id = sync_node.GetId();
+  return true;
+}
+
+Value* PrefModelAssociator::MergePreference(
+    const PrefService::Preference& local_pref,
+    const Value& server_value) {
+  const std::string& name(local_pref.name());
+  if (name == prefs::kURLsToRestoreOnStartup ||

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

Instead of doing this, could we not do local_pref->GetType() ?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

I'm not sure how that would solve this? GetType tells you the type of
preference, while this is concerned with the preference name.

+      name == prefs::kDesktopNotificationAllowedOrigins ||
+      name == prefs::kDesktopNotificationDeniedOrigins) {
+    return MergeListValues(*local_pref.GetValue(), server_value);
+  }
+
+  if (name == prefs::kContentSettingsPatterns ||
+      name == prefs::kGeolocationContentSettings) {
+    return MergeDictionaryValues(*local_pref.GetValue(), server_value);
+  }
+
+  // If this is not a specially handled preference, server wins.
+  return server_value.DeepCopy();
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::WritePreferenceToNode(
+    const std::string& name,
+    const Value& value,
+    sync_api::WriteNode* node) {
+  std::string serialized;
+  JSONStringValueSerializer json(&serialized);
+  if (!json.Serialize(value)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Failed to serialize preference value.";
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  sync_pb::PreferenceSpecifics preference;
+  preference.set_name(name);
+  preference.set_value(serialized);
+  node->SetPreferenceSpecifics(preference);
+  // TODO(viettrungluu): eliminate conversion (it's temporary)
+  node->SetTitle(UTF8ToWide(name));
+  return true;
+}
+
+Value* PrefModelAssociator::MergeListValues(const Value& from_value,
+                                                  const Value& to_value) {

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

nit - indent

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+  if (from_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_NULL)
+    return to_value.DeepCopy();
+  if (to_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_NULL)
+    return from_value.DeepCopy();
+
+  DCHECK(from_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_LIST);
+  DCHECK(to_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_LIST);
+  const ListValue& from_list_value = static_cast<const ListValue&>(from_value);
+  const ListValue& to_list_value = static_cast<const ListValue&>(to_value);
+  ListValue* result = to_list_value.DeepCopy();
+
+  for (ListValue::const_iterator i = from_list_value.begin();
+       i != from_list_value.end(); ++i) {
+    Value* value = (*i)->DeepCopy();
+    result->AppendIfNotPresent(value);
+  }
+  return result;
+}
+
+Value* PrefModelAssociator::MergeDictionaryValues(
+    const Value& from_value,
+    const Value& to_value) {
+  if (from_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_NULL)
+    return to_value.DeepCopy();
+  if (to_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_NULL)
+    return from_value.DeepCopy();
+
+  DCHECK(from_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_DICTIONARY);

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

DCHECK_EQ

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+  DCHECK(to_value.GetType() == Value::TYPE_DICTIONARY);
+  const DictionaryValue& from_dict_value =
+      static_cast<const DictionaryValue&>(from_value);
+  const DictionaryValue& to_dict_value =
+      static_cast<const DictionaryValue&>(to_value);
+  DictionaryValue* result = to_dict_value.DeepCopy();
+
+  for (DictionaryValue::key_iterator key = from_dict_value.begin_keys();
+       key != from_dict_value.end_keys(); ++key) {
+    Value* from_value;
+    bool success = from_dict_value.GetWithoutPathExpansion(*key, &from_value);
+    DCHECK(success);
+
+    Value* to_key_value;
+    if (result->GetWithoutPathExpansion(*key, &to_key_value)) {
+      if (to_key_value->GetType() == Value::TYPE_DICTIONARY) {
+        Value* merged_value = MergeDictionaryValues(*from_value, *to_key_value);
+        result->SetWithoutPathExpansion(*key, merged_value);
+      }
+      // Note that for all other types we want to preserve the "to"
+      // values so we do nothing here.
+    } else {
+      result->SetWithoutPathExpansion(*key, from_value->DeepCopy());
+    }
+  }
+  return result;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::AfterUpdateOperations(

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

SendUpdateNotificationsIfNecessary?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+    const std::string& pref_name) {
+  // The bookmark bar visibility preference requires a special
+  // notification to update the UI.
+  if (0 == pref_name.compare(prefs::kShowBookmarkBar)) {
+    NotificationService::current()->Notify(
+        NotificationType::BOOKMARK_BAR_VISIBILITY_PREF_CHANGED,
+        Source<PrefModelAssociator>(this),
+        NotificationService::NoDetails());
+  }
+}
+
+// Not implemented;

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

nit - .

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Done.

+void PrefModelAssociator::AbortAssociation() {}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::CryptoReadyIfNecessary() {
+  // We only access the cryptographer while holding a transaction.
+  sync_api::ReadTransaction trans(sync_service_->GetUserShare());
+  syncable::ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
+  sync_service_->GetEncryptedDataTypes(&encrypted_types);
+  return encrypted_types.count(syncable::PREFERENCES) == 0 ||
+         sync_service_->IsCryptographerReady(&trans);
+}
+
+syncable::ModelType PrefModelAssociator::model_type() const {
+  return syncable::PREFERENCES;
+}
+
+// Not implemented.
+void PrefModelAssociator::set_change_processor(
+    browser_sync::ChangeProcessor* processor) {}
+
+browser_sync::ChangeProcessor* PrefModelAssociator::change_processor() {
+  if (!change_processor_) {
+    change_processor_ =
+        new browser_sync::GenericChangeProcessor(sync_service_, this);
+  }
+  return change_processor_;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::ApplyChangesFromSync(
+    const sync_api::BaseTransaction* trans,
+    const sync_api::SyncManager::ChangeRecord* changes,
+    int change_count) {
+  if (!models_associated_)
+    return;
+  processing_syncer_changes_ = true;
+  for (int i = 0; i < change_count; ++i) {
+    // TODO(ncarter): Can't look up the name for deletions: lookup of

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

is this still true?  we have the entire specifics now, don't we?

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

True, although we never delete preferences (due to legacy versions). I've
updated the comments.

+    // deleted items fails at the syncapi layer.  However, the node should
+    // generally still exist in the syncable database; we just need to
+    // plumb the syncapi so that it succeeds.
+    if (sync_api::SyncManager::ChangeRecord::ACTION_DELETE ==
+        changes[i].action) {
+      // Until the above is fixed, we have no choice but to ignore deletions.
+      LOG(ERROR) << "No way to handle pref deletion";
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    sync_api::ReadNode node(trans);
+    if (!node.InitByIdLookup(changes[i].id)) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Preference node lookup failed.";
+      processing_syncer_changes_ = false;
+      return;
+    }
+    DCHECK(syncable::PREFERENCES == node.GetModelType());
+    std::string name;
+    sync_pb::PreferenceSpecifics pref_specifics =
+        node.GetPreferenceSpecifics();
+    scoped_ptr<Value> value(ReadPreferenceSpecifics(pref_specifics,
+                                                    &name));
+    // Skip values we can't deserialize.
+    if (!value.get())
+      continue;
+
+    // It is possible that we may receive a change to a preference we do not
+    // want to sync. For example if the user is syncing a Mac client and a
+    // Windows client, the Windows client does not support
+    // kConfirmToQuitEnabled. Ignore updates from these preferences.
+    const char* pref_name = name.c_str();
+    if (!IsPrefRegistered(pref_name))
+      continue;
+
+    const PrefService::Preference* pref =
+        pref_service_->FindPreference(pref_name);
+    DCHECK(pref);
+    if (!pref->IsUserModifiable()) {
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    if (sync_api::SyncManager::ChangeRecord::ACTION_DELETE ==
+        changes[i].action) {
+      pref_service_->ClearPref(pref_name);
+    } else {
+      pref_service_->Set(pref_name, *value);
+
+      // If this is a newly added node, associate.
+      if (sync_api::SyncManager::ChangeRecord::ACTION_ADD ==
+          changes[i].action) {
+        Associate(pref, changes[i].id);
+      }
+
+      AfterUpdateOperations(name);
+    }
+  }
+  processing_syncer_changes_ = false;
+}
+
+Value* PrefModelAssociator::ReadPreferenceSpecifics(
+    const sync_pb::PreferenceSpecifics& preference,
+    std::string* name) {
+  base::JSONReader reader;
+  scoped_ptr<Value> value(reader.JsonToValue(preference.value(), false, false));
+  if (!value.get()) {
+    std::string err = "Failed to deserialize preference value: " +
+        reader.GetErrorMessage();
+    LOG(ERROR) << err;
+    return NULL;
+  }
+  *name = preference.name();
+  return value.release();
+}
+
+
+std::set<std::string> PrefModelAssociator::synced_preferences() {
+  return synced_preferences_;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::RegisterPref(const char* name) {
+  DCHECK(!models_associated_ && synced_preferences_.count(name) == 0);
+  synced_preferences_.insert(name);
+}
+
+bool PrefModelAssociator::IsPrefRegistered(const char* name) {
+  return synced_preferences_.count(name) > 0;
+}
+
+void PrefModelAssociator::ProcessPrefChange(const std::string& name) {
+  if (processing_syncer_changes_ || processing_syncapi_changes_)
+    return;  // These are changes originating from us, ignore.
+
+  // We only process changes if we've already associated models.
+  if (!sync_service_ || !models_associated_)
+    return;
+
+  const PrefService::Preference* preference =
+      pref_service_->FindPreference(name.c_str());
+  if (!IsPrefRegistered(name.c_str()))
+    return;  // We are not syncing this preference.
+
+  // The preference does not have a node. This can happen if the preference
+  // held the default value at association time. Create one and associate.
+  int64 root_id;
+  if (!GetSyncIdForTaggedNode(kPreferencesTag, &root_id)) {
+    LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+               << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+    return;
+  }
+
+  int64 sync_id = GetSyncIdFromChromeId(name);
+  if (!preference->IsUserModifiable()) {
+    // If the preference is not currently user modifiable, disassociate, so that
+    // if it becomes user modifiable me pick up the server value.
+    Disassociate(sync_id);
+    return;
+  }
+
+  processing_syncapi_changes_ = true;
+  sync_api::WriteTransaction trans(sync_service_->GetUserShare());
+
+  // Since we don't create sync nodes for preferences that are not under control
+  // of the user or still have their default value, this changed preference may
+  // not have a sync node yet. If so, we create a node. Similarly, a preference
+  // may become user-modifiable (e.g. due to laxer policy configuration), in
+  // which case we also need to create a sync node and associate it.
+  if (sync_id == sync_api::kInvalidId) {
+    sync_api::ReadNode root(&trans);
+    if (!root.InitByIdLookup(root_id)) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Server did not create the top-level preferences node. We "
+                 << "might be running against an out-of-date server.";
+      processing_syncapi_changes_ = false;

[tim (not reviewing), 2011/04/28 21:51:44]

Check out base::AutoReset (auto_reset.h)

[Nicolas Zea, 2011/05/03 18:59:36]

Nice, was wondering if something like that existed.

+      return;
+    }
+    InitPrefNodeAndAssociate(&trans, root, preference);
+  } else {
+    sync_api::WriteNode node(&trans);
+    if (!node.InitByIdLookup(sync_id)) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Preference node lookup failed.";
+      processing_syncapi_changes_ = false;
+      return;
+    }
+
+    if (!WritePreferenceToNode(name, *preference->GetValue(), &node)) {
+      LOG(ERROR) << "Failed to update preference node.";
+      processing_syncapi_changes_ = false;
+      return;
+    }
+  }
+
+  processing_syncapi_changes_ = false;
+}