Chromium Code Reviews| Index: test/mjsunit/compiler/property-refs.js |
| diff --git a/test/mjsunit/compiler/property-refs.js b/test/mjsunit/compiler/property-refs.js |
| index 3f6f7937c36ed57493c68f99298b9f4c5f8bcd41..917b97d8c48f05ed2463225d349e0e38329378ab 100644 |
| --- a/test/mjsunit/compiler/property-refs.js |
| +++ b/test/mjsunit/compiler/property-refs.js |
| @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ |
| // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
| // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| +// Flags: --allow-natives-syntax |
| + |
| function Load(o) { |
| return o.outer.x | o.outer.inner.y; |
| } |
| @@ -45,7 +47,11 @@ function LoadXY(x, y) { |
| return Load(object); |
| } |
| -for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) LoadXY(i, i); |
| +for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) LoadXY(i, i); |
| +%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(StoreXY); |
|
Mads Ager (chromium)
2011/04/11 11:06:38
Similarly here. If you do not optimize this here,
Jakob Kummerow
2011/04/11 12:55:51
Yes, StoreXY does get inlined if only LoadXY is op
|
| +LoadXY(6, 6); |
| +%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(LoadXY); |
| +LoadXY(7, 7); |
| assertEquals(42 | 87, LoadXY(42, 87)); |
| assertEquals(42 | 87, LoadXY(42, 87)); |
| assertEquals(42 | 99, LoadXY(42, "99")); |