Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3378)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_cache_base.h

Issue 6705031: Send policy blobs to session_manager (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 9 years, 9 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_cache_base.h
diff --git a/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_cache_base.h b/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_cache_base.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..294b1a99717e8d70ad7e390c124b44210d8509d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/policy/cloud_policy_cache_base.h
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef CHROME_BROWSER_POLICY_CLOUD_POLICY_CACHE_BASE_H_
+#define CHROME_BROWSER_POLICY_CLOUD_POLICY_CACHE_BASE_H_
+
+#include "base/gtest_prod_util.h"
+#include "base/observer_list.h"
+#include "base/scoped_ptr.h"
+#include "base/threading/non_thread_safe.h"
+#include "base/time.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_provider.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/policy_map.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/proto/device_management_backend.pb.h"
+
+namespace policy {
+
+class PolicyMap;
+
+namespace em = enterprise_management;
+
+// Caches policy information, as set by calls to |SetPolicy()|, persists
+// it to disk or session_manager (depending on subclass implementation),
+// and makes it available via policy providers.
+class CloudPolicyCacheBase : public base::NonThreadSafe {
+ public:
+ // Used to distinguish mandatory from recommended policies.
+ enum PolicyLevel {
+ // Policy is forced upon the user and should always take effect.
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ // The value is just a recommendation that the user may override.
+ POLICY_LEVEL_RECOMMENDED,
+ };
+
+ CloudPolicyCacheBase();
+ virtual ~CloudPolicyCacheBase();
+
+ // Loads persisted policy information.
+ virtual void Load() = 0;
+
+ // Resets the policy information.
+ virtual void SetPolicy(const em::PolicyFetchResponse& policy) = 0;
+
+ ConfigurationPolicyProvider* GetManagedPolicyProvider();
+ ConfigurationPolicyProvider* GetRecommendedPolicyProvider();
+
+ virtual void SetUnmanaged() = 0;
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2011/03/24 18:55:57 Why is the setter virtual and getter not? Should w
Jakob Kummerow 2011/03/28 13:53:53 Because what the setter needs to do depends on the
+ bool is_unmanaged() const {
+ return is_unmanaged_;
+ }
+
+ // Returns the time at which the policy was last fetched.
+ base::Time last_policy_refresh_time() const {
+ return last_policy_refresh_time_;
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ // Decodes the given |policy| using |DecodePolicyResponse()|, applies the
+ // contents to |{mandatory,recommended}_policy_|, and notifies observers.
+ // Returns true upon success.
+ bool SetPolicyInternal(const em::PolicyFetchResponse& policy);
+
+ // Decodes |policy_data|, populating |mandatory| and |recommended| with
+ // the results.
+ virtual bool DecodePolicyData(const em::PolicyData& policy_data,
+ PolicyMap* mandatory,
+ PolicyMap* recommended) = 0;
+
+ // Decodes a PolicyFetchResponse into two PolicyMaps and a timestamp.
+ // Also performs verification, returns NULL if any check fails.
+ bool DecodePolicyResponse(
+ const em::PolicyFetchResponse& policy_response,
+ PolicyMap* mandatory,
+ PolicyMap* recommended,
+ base::Time* timestamp);
+
+ // Policy key-value information.
+ PolicyMap mandatory_policy_;
+ PolicyMap recommended_policy_;
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2011/03/24 18:55:57 Does this need to be protected?
Jakob Kummerow 2011/03/28 13:53:53 Done -- managed to make it private.
+
+ // Whether initialization has been completed. This is the case when we have
+ // valid policy, learned that the device is unmanaged or ran into
+ // unrecoverable errors.
+ bool initialization_complete_;
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2011/03/24 18:55:57 Same question here?
Jakob Kummerow 2011/03/28 13:53:53 UserPolicyCache needs to read it. I made the membe
+
+ // Whether the the server has indicated this device is unmanaged.
+ bool is_unmanaged_;
+
+ // The time at which the policy was last refreshed.
+ base::Time last_policy_refresh_time_;
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2011/03/24 18:55:57 And here?
Jakob Kummerow 2011/03/28 13:53:53 Currently, both when this field is set and to whic
+
+ // Provider observers that are registered with this cache's providers.
+ ObserverList<ConfigurationPolicyProvider::Observer, true> observer_list_;
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2011/03/24 18:55:57 And here?
Jakob Kummerow 2011/03/28 13:53:53 Done -- managed to make it private.
+
+ private:
+ class CloudPolicyProvider;
+
+ friend class DevicePolicyCacheTest;
+ friend class UserPolicyCacheTest;
+
+ // Policy providers.
+ scoped_ptr<ConfigurationPolicyProvider> managed_policy_provider_;
+ scoped_ptr<ConfigurationPolicyProvider> recommended_policy_provider_;
+
+ DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(CloudPolicyCacheBase);
+};
+
+} // namespace policy
+
+#endif // CHROME_BROWSER_POLICY_CLOUD_POLICY_CACHE_BASE_H_

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698