Chromium Code Reviews| Index: test/cctest/test-api.cc |
| =================================================================== |
| --- test/cctest/test-api.cc (revision 7168) |
| +++ test/cctest/test-api.cc (working copy) |
| @@ -5659,6 +5659,14 @@ |
| global_template->SetAccessCheckCallbacks(NamedAccessBlocker, |
| IndexedAccessBlocker); |
| + // Add accessible accessor. |
| + global_template->SetAccessor( |
| + v8_str("accessible_prop"), |
| + EchoGetter, EchoSetter, |
| + v8::Handle<Value>(), |
| + v8::AccessControl(v8::ALL_CAN_READ | v8::ALL_CAN_WRITE)); |
| + |
| + |
| // Add an accessor that is not accessible by cross-domain JS code. |
| global_template->SetAccessor(v8_str("blocked_prop"), |
| UnreachableGetter, UnreachableSetter, |
| @@ -5699,6 +5707,17 @@ |
| CompileRun("Object.seal(other)"); |
| ExpectTrue("Object.isExtensible(other)"); |
| + |
| + // Regression test for issue 1250. |
| + // Make sure that we can set the accessible accessors value using normal |
| + // assignment. |
| + CompileRun("other.accessible_prop = 42"); |
| + CHECK_EQ(42, g_echo_value); |
| + |
| + v8::Handle<Value> value; |
|
Mads Ager (chromium)
2011/03/15 09:12:50
Add comment here saying something like: We follow
|
| + CompileRun("Object.defineProperty(other, 'accessible_prop', {value: -1})"); |
| + value = CompileRun("other.accessible_prop == 42"); |
| + CHECK(value->IsTrue()); |
| } |