Index: src/arm/assembler-arm.cc |
=================================================================== |
--- src/arm/assembler-arm.cc (revision 7118) |
+++ src/arm/assembler-arm.cc (working copy) |
@@ -767,11 +767,35 @@ |
} |
-bool Operand::is_single_instruction() const { |
+bool Operand::is_single_instruction(Instr instr) const { |
if (rm_.is_valid()) return true; |
- if (must_use_constant_pool()) return false; |
uint32_t dummy1, dummy2; |
Lasse Reichstein
2011/03/10 11:58:48
So the change here is that even if must_use_consta
Søren Thygesen Gjesse
2011/03/10 12:47:02
Before this was never used to check a mov instruct
|
- return fits_shifter(imm32_, &dummy1, &dummy2, NULL); |
+ if (must_use_constant_pool() || |
+ !fits_shifter(imm32_, &dummy1, &dummy2, &instr)) { |
+ // The immediate operand cannot be encoded as a shifter operand, or use of |
+ // constant pool is required. For a mov instruction not setting the |
+ // condition code additional instruction conventions can be used. |
+ if ((instr & ~kCondMask) == 13*B21) { // mov, S not set |
+ if (must_use_constant_pool() || !CpuFeatures::IsSupported(ARMv7)) { |
Lasse Reichstein
2011/03/10 11:58:48
Could you force using the constant pool for some i
Søren Thygesen Gjesse
2011/03/10 12:47:02
The only case where movw and movt will be used is
|
+ // mov instruction will be an ldr from constant pool (one instruction). |
+ return true; |
+ } else { |
+ // mov instruction will be a mov or movw followed by movt (two |
+ // instructions). |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ } else { |
+ // If this is not a mov or mvn instruction there will always an additional |
+ // instructions - either mov or ldr. The mov might actually be two |
+ // instructions mov or movw followed by movt so including the actual |
+ // instruction two or three instructions will be generated. |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ } else { |
+ // No use of constant pool and the immediate operand can be encoded as a |
+ // shifter operand. |
+ return true; |
+ } |
} |