Chromium Code Reviews| Index: remoting/protocol/client_stub.h |
| diff --git a/remoting/protocol/client_stub.h b/remoting/protocol/client_stub.h |
| index 4b73789b84abeb95623275e5bee259665e2447b8..569d96eb331ca968ed1a56b4937b72140ab26bcd 100644 |
| --- a/remoting/protocol/client_stub.h |
| +++ b/remoting/protocol/client_stub.h |
| @@ -22,15 +22,30 @@ class NotifyResolutionRequest; |
| class ClientStub { |
| public: |
| - ClientStub() {} |
| - virtual ~ClientStub() {} |
| + ClientStub(); |
|
Wez
2011/03/04 12:09:38
Is there a more descriptive name we can attached t
garykac
2011/03/04 20:28:02
I agree that it would be nice to have better names
|
| + virtual ~ClientStub(); |
| virtual void NotifyResolution(const NotifyResolutionRequest* msg, |
| Task* done) = 0; |
| virtual void BeginSessionResponse(const LocalLoginStatus* msg, |
| Task* done) = 0; |
| + // Enable the host->client control channel. |
| + // This should be set to true only after a trusted communication channel has |
| + // been established. |
| + // When this is false, only a limited set of control messages will be |
| + // processed. |
| + void SetEnabled(bool enabled); |
| + |
|
Wez
2011/03/04 12:09:38
Move from SetEnabled(bool) to OnAuthenticated()?
garykac
2011/03/04 20:28:02
Done.
|
| + // Is the control channel enabled? |
| + // I.e., should we be processing control events? |
| + bool enabled(); |
|
Wez
2011/03/04 12:09:38
Do we need this?
garykac
2011/03/04 20:28:02
The message dispatchers make use of this to cut of
|
| + |
| private: |
| + // Initially false, this controls whether the control events received from |
| + // the host should be processed. |
| + bool enabled_; |
| + |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ClientStub); |
| }; |