Chromium Code Reviews| Index: chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore_uitest.cc |
| diff --git a/chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore_uitest.cc b/chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore_uitest.cc |
| index d79efa5337a50b5d82452b611f04e8189c82d0d0..496f67195fbc177524453f0b7121a5864b8ddef7 100644 |
| --- a/chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore_uitest.cc |
| +++ b/chrome/browser/sessions/session_restore_uitest.cc |
| @@ -450,9 +450,7 @@ TEST_F(SessionRestoreUITest, TwoWindowsCloseOneRestoreOnlyOne) { |
| // process-per-site and process-per-site-instance, because we treat the new tab |
| // as a special case in process-per-site-instance so that it only ever uses one |
| // process.) |
| -// |
| -// Flaky: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=52022 |
| -TEST_F(SessionRestoreUITest, FLAKY_ShareProcessesOnRestore) { |
| +TEST_F(SessionRestoreUITest, ShareProcessesOnRestore) { |
|
Evan Martin
2011/02/23 00:17:32
Did you mean to include this?
sky
2011/02/23 00:38:57
Yes. All the changes I've done to ChromeURLDataMan
|
| if (ProxyLauncher::in_process_renderer()) { |
| // No point in running this test in single process mode. |
| return; |