Sputnik tests - forward to r94.

test/sputnik/sputnik.status

Index: test/sputnik/sputnik.status
diff --git a/test/sputnik/sputnik.status b/test/sputnik/sputnik.status
index 966500d069742c15ac8789cd1784c0443425d1e6..0fd66deaece25c99dccc4371ecad5f70bf4f0598 100644
--- a/test/sputnik/sputnik.status
+++ b/test/sputnik/sputnik.status
@@ -102,33 +102,20 @@ S7.8.4_A4.3_T5: FAIL_OK
 S7.8.4_A7.2_T5: FAIL_OK
 
 # We allow some keywords to be used as identifiers
-S7.5.3_A1.17: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.26: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.18: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.27: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.28: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.19: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.29: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.1: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.2: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.3: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.4: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.5: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.8: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.9: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.10: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.11: FAIL_OK
+# native
+S7.5.3_A1.20: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.21: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.12: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.30: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.31: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.13: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.22: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.23: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.14: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.15: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.24: FAIL_OK
-S7.5.3_A1.25: FAIL_OK
 S7.5.3_A1.16: FAIL_OK
 
 # This checks for non-262 behavior
@@ -199,10 +186,46 @@ S9.9_A2: FAIL_OK
 S15.1.3.2_A2.5_T1: PASS, SKIP if $mode == debug
 S15.1.3.1_A2.5_T1: PASS, SKIP if $mode == debug
 
+# V8 Bug: http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1196
+S8.7_A5_T2: FAIL
+# Suspected invalid test case. Object.prototype.toString
+# toString should call ToObject(this) which should throw
+# with undefined/null. Test expects otherwise.

[Lasse Reichstein, 2011/02/23 06:12:32]

Object.prototype.toString has special cases for null and undefined as the two
first steps of the algorithm. After that, it does ToObject on the remaining
values.

[Martin Maly, 2011/02/23 18:12:10]

Cleaned up. These 2 failures are captured below as well as a V8 bug.

+# Also V8 Bug: V8 should not wrap this when calling toString.
+S15.2.4.2_A12: FAIL
+S15.2.4.2_A13: FAIL
+
+# V8 bugs: http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1198
+# V8 should not wrap this when calling builtin functions

[Lasse Reichstein, 2011/02/23 06:12:32]

We should have avoided that already. Are we wrapping this now?

[Martin Maly, 2011/02/23 18:12:10]

not wrapping for builtins is on my todo list still. Some builtins may already
work but not the builtins implemented in javascript themselves. Once that's
done, all these tests will start passing.

+S15.2.4.3_A12: FAIL
+S15.2.4.7_A13: FAIL
+# Object.prototype.toString
+S15.2.4.2_A12: FAIL
+S15.2.4.2_A13: FAIL
+# Object.prototype.toLocaleString
+S15.2.4.3_A13: FAIL
+S15.2.4.4_A13: FAIL
+S15.2.4.4_A12: FAIL
+# Object.prototype.propertyIsEnumerable
+S15.2.4.7_A12: FAIL
+# Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
+S15.2.4.5_A12: FAIL
+S15.2.4.5_A13: FAIL
+# Object.prototype.isPrototypeOf
+S15.2.4.6_A13: FAIL
+S15.2.4.6_A12: FAIL
+
+# Suspected test bug
+S8.3_A1_T1: FAIL
+# Test bug: http://code.google.com/p/sputniktests/issues/detail?id=35
+S15.5.4.8_A1_T1: FAIL
+# Suspected invalid test case (recent change adding var changes semantics?)
+S15.3_A3_T1: FAIL

[Lasse Reichstein, 2011/02/23 06:12:32]

Agree.

[Martin Maly, 2011/02/23 18:12:10]

Done.

+# Suspected invalid test case (recent change adding var changes semantics?)
+S15.3_A3_T3: FAIL

[Lasse Reichstein, 2011/02/23 06:12:32]

And agree. 
The tests did depend on a variable not being present before the assignment to
the global property.

[Martin Maly, 2011/02/23 18:12:10]

Done.

 
 # These tests fail because we had to add bugs to be compatible with JSC.  See
 # http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1717
-S15.4.4_A1.1_T2: FAIL_OK
 S15.5.4.1_A1_T2: FAIL_OK
 S15.5.4_A1: FAIL_OK
 S15.5.4_A3: FAIL_OK