Add content_settings::PolicyProvider and a set of new policies to managed content settings.

chrome/browser/content_settings/content_settings_policy_provider_unittest.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2010 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "chrome/browser/content_settings/content_settings_policy_provider.h"
 
 #include "chrome/browser/browser_thread.h"
 #include "chrome/browser/content_settings/stub_settings_observer.h"
 #include "chrome/browser/prefs/pref_service.h"
 #include "chrome/common/pref_names.h"
 #include "chrome/common/url_constants.h"
 #include "chrome/test/testing_pref_service.h"
 #include "chrome/test/testing_profile.h"
 #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
-
+#include "googleurl/src/gurl.h"
 
 namespace content_settings {
 
 class PolicyDefaultProviderTest : public testing::Test {
  public:
   PolicyDefaultProviderTest()
       : ui_thread_(BrowserThread::UI, &message_loop_) {
   }
 
  protected:
@@ skipping 47 matching lines @@
   // Remove the managed default-content-setting.
   prefs->RemoveManagedPref(prefs::kManagedDefaultImagesSetting);
   EXPECT_EQ(profile.GetHostContentSettingsMap(), observer.last_notifier);
   EXPECT_EQ(CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_DEFAULT, observer.last_type);
   EXPECT_EQ(ContentSettingsPattern(), observer.last_pattern);
   EXPECT_TRUE(observer.last_update_all);
   EXPECT_TRUE(observer.last_update_all_types);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, observer.counter);
 }
 
+class PolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+  PolicyProviderTest()
+      : ui_thread_(BrowserThread::UI, &message_loop_) {

[Bernhard Bauer, 2011/02/23 13:18:53]

Is this because of a |DCHECK(BrowserThread::CurrentlyOn(BrowserThread::UI))|
somewhere? If so, maybe we should think about making the class in question
derive from NonThreadSafe, which uses native thread identifiers instead of
BrowserThread IDs.

[Bernhard Bauer, 2011/02/25 16:08:01]

Did you see this comment?

[markusheintz_, 2011/02/28 09:08:44]

Sorry I forgot to add my reply. Yeah I agree. We should get rid of this. This is
true for other content_settings_providers as well. So I'd prefer to have a
sparate CL for that and fix all. Added a TODO.

+  }
+
+ protected:
+  MessageLoop message_loop_;
+  BrowserThread ui_thread_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(PolicyProviderTest, Default) {
+  TestingProfile profile;
+  TestingPrefService* prefs = profile.GetTestingPrefService();
+
+  ListValue* value = new ListValue();
+  value->Append(Value::CreateStringValue("[*.]google.com"));
+  prefs->SetManagedPref(prefs::kManagedImagesBlockedForUrls,
+                        value);
+
+  PolicyProvider provider(static_cast<Profile*>(&profile));
+
+  ContentSettingsPattern yt_url_pattern("www.youtube.com");
+  GURL youtube_url("http://www.youtube.com");
+  GURL google_url("http://mail.google.com");
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(CONTENT_SETTING_DEFAULT,
+            provider.GetContentSetting(
+                youtube_url, youtube_url, CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_COOKIES, ""));
+  EXPECT_EQ(CONTENT_SETTING_BLOCK,
+            provider.GetContentSetting(
+                google_url, google_url, CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_IMAGES, ""));
+
+  provider.SetContentSetting(
+      yt_url_pattern,
+      yt_url_pattern,
+      CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_COOKIES,
+      "",
+      CONTENT_SETTING_BLOCK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(CONTENT_SETTING_DEFAULT,
+            provider.GetContentSetting(
+                youtube_url, youtube_url, CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_COOKIES, ""));
+}
+
 }  // namespace content_settings