Merge remote branch 'cros/upstream' into master.

Merge remote branch 'cros/upstream' into master.

Merged to upstream autotest @5216~@5235.

Most of the stuff are from Olof's arm cross compiling and some misc changes from Dale Curtis.

As usual,the entire change list description is too big to enlist here. Please refer to upstream (http://autotest.kernel.org/browser) for more details.

BUG=none
TEST=1. emerge-arm-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
2. emerge-x86-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
3. run bvt from both src/third_party and inside emerged
chroot/..usr/local/autotest.
Seems fine. No regression found.

Committed: http://chrome-svn/viewvc/chromeos?view=rev&revision=8a12e80

[ericli, 2011-02-17 01:22:58]

As usual, early review as testing is still undergoing.

I will update test stanza after it finished.

[DaleCurtis, 2011-02-17 01:27:31]

Everything looks fine for my changes and in anything that might affect us. 

On 2011/02/17 01:22:58, ericli wrote:
> As usual, early review as testing is still undergoing.
> 
> I will update test stanza after it finished.

[ericli, 2011-02-17 17:40:29]

Hold on,
seems like all your makefile.patch files were not properly patched into
upstream.

In conversation with the committer.

[ericli, 2011-02-17 19:42:19]

I have talked with the upstream committer and he forgot the svn add all
makefile.patches. And he will make it up today.

In the mean time, I had tested:
1. emerge-arm-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
2. emerge-x86-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
3. run bvt from both src/third_party and inside emerged
chroot/..usr/local/autotest.
Seems fine.

There is no regression found, and of cause, olof's cross compiling test cases
would not work for now, but since they are not in our default pre-build test
lists, I assume it should be OK.

I am still intend to push this CL in so I could unblock some of Dale's pending
work. Would like to seek a LGTM from both of you guys if are OK with my
proposal.

[DaleCurtis, 2011-02-17 22:07:20]

LGTM unless olof has any objections.

On 2011/02/17 19:42:19, ericli wrote:
> I have talked with the upstream committer and he forgot the svn add all
> makefile.patches. And he will make it up today.
> 
> In the mean time, I had tested:
> 1. emerge-arm-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> 2. emerge-x86-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> 3. run bvt from both src/third_party and inside emerged
> chroot/..usr/local/autotest.
> Seems fine.
> 
> There is no regression found, and of cause, olof's cross compiling test cases
> would not work for now, but since they are not in our default pre-build test
> lists, I assume it should be OK.
> 
> I am still intend to push this CL in so I could unblock some of Dale's pending
> work. Would like to seek a LGTM from both of you guys if are OK with my
> proposal.

[Olof Johansson, 2011-02-17 22:18:23]

If there is no delta between my CLs and this code, than this is fine with me.
It's hard to tell since it was all balled together.


-Olof

On 2011/02/17 22:07:20, dalec wrote:
> LGTM unless olof has any objections.
> 
> On 2011/02/17 19:42:19, ericli wrote:
> > I have talked with the upstream committer and he forgot the svn add all
> > makefile.patches. And he will make it up today.
> > 
> > In the mean time, I had tested:
> > 1. emerge-arm-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> > 2. emerge-x86-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> > 3. run bvt from both src/third_party and inside emerged
> > chroot/..usr/local/autotest.
> > Seems fine.
> > 
> > There is no regression found, and of cause, olof's cross compiling test
cases
> > would not work for now, but since they are not in our default pre-build test
> > lists, I assume it should be OK.
> > 
> > I am still intend to push this CL in so I could unblock some of Dale's
pending
> > work. Would like to seek a LGTM from both of you guys if are OK with my
> > proposal.

[ericli, 2011-02-17 22:23:10]

Alright, I will take this as an LTGM from you. And I will keep talking with you
for other follow-up changes.

Thanks.

On 2011/02/17 22:18:23, Olof Johansson wrote:
> If there is no delta between my CLs and this code, than this is fine with me.
> It's hard to tell since it was all balled together.
> 
> 
> -Olof
> 
> On 2011/02/17 22:07:20, dalec wrote:
> > LGTM unless olof has any objections.
> > 
> > On 2011/02/17 19:42:19, ericli wrote:
> > > I have talked with the upstream committer and he forgot the svn add all
> > > makefile.patches. And he will make it up today.
> > > 
> > > In the mean time, I had tested:
> > > 1. emerge-arm-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> > > 2. emerge-x86-generic autotest autotest-deps autotest-tests
> > > 3. run bvt from both src/third_party and inside emerged
> > > chroot/..usr/local/autotest.
> > > Seems fine.
> > > 
> > > There is no regression found, and of cause, olof's cross compiling test
> cases
> > > would not work for now, but since they are not in our default pre-build
test
> > > lists, I assume it should be OK.
> > > 
> > > I am still intend to push this CL in so I could unblock some of Dale's
> pending
> > > work. Would like to seek a LGTM from both of you guys if are OK with my
> > > proposal.