Index: test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
diff --git a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
index 1ab5bf88b4252d475408e946808a557cfadbc90b..981e63f1b7e65c5c70875c696e739095ebd02d7c 100644 |
--- a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
+++ b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
@@ -25,11 +25,16 @@ |
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
+// We not throw syntax errors early for invalid break and continue |
Mads Ager (chromium)
2011/01/17 09:29:13
We not -> We
Lasse Reichstein
2011/01/17 09:34:08
Should have been "We now". Changed to just "We".
|
+// statements. The behavior has changed to make this a syntax error. |
+// (Notice that the example isn't valid ECMAScript due to the |
+// function declaration that is not at top level.) |
+ |
function f() { |
// Force eager compilation of x through the use of eval. The break |
// in function x should not try to break out of the enclosing while. |
return eval("while(0) function x() { break; }; 42"); |
}; |
-assertEquals(42, f()); |
+assertThrows("f()"); |