Chromium Code Reviews| Index: test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
| diff --git a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
| index 1ab5bf88b4252d475408e946808a557cfadbc90b..981e63f1b7e65c5c70875c696e739095ebd02d7c 100644 |
| --- a/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
| +++ b/test/mjsunit/regress/regress-990205.js |
| @@ -25,11 +25,16 @@ |
| // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
| // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| +// We not throw syntax errors early for invalid break and continue |
|
Mads Ager (chromium)
2011/01/17 09:29:13
We not -> We
Lasse Reichstein
2011/01/17 09:34:08
Should have been "We now". Changed to just "We".
|
| +// statements. The behavior has changed to make this a syntax error. |
| +// (Notice that the example isn't valid ECMAScript due to the |
| +// function declaration that is not at top level.) |
| + |
| function f() { |
| // Force eager compilation of x through the use of eval. The break |
| // in function x should not try to break out of the enclosing while. |
| return eval("while(0) function x() { break; }; 42"); |
| }; |
| -assertEquals(42, f()); |
| +assertThrows("f()"); |