Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(111)

Issue 6038006: Leftover wstring removal from r70290 (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 11 months ago by sadrul
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Leftover wstring removal from r70290 This should fix compile in the touch buildbot. BUG=touch buildbot is broken TEST=see bug Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=70297

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 6

Patch Set 2 : address comments #

Patch Set 3 : headers #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+18 lines, -13 lines) Patch
M views/examples/table2_example.h View 1 2 3 chunks +18 lines, -13 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 7 (0 generated)
sadrul
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 04:00:06 UTC) #1
viettrungluu
LGTM with comment (which you can feel free to ignore; certainly your changes make things ...
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 05:21:16 UTC) #2
viettrungluu
You *should* #include <string>, however.
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 05:22:08 UTC) #3
sadrul
Thanks for the quick review! <string> is included via base/string_util.h http://codereview.chromium.org/6038006/diff/1/views/examples/table2_example.h File views/examples/table2_example.h (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/6038006/diff/1/views/examples/table2_example.h#newcode105 ...
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 05:33:49 UTC) #4
viettrungluu
On 2010/12/30 05:33:49, sadrul wrote: > Thanks for the quick review! > > <string> is ...
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 05:40:03 UTC) #5
sadrul
On 2010/12/30 05:40:03, viettrungluu wrote: > On 2010/12/30 05:33:49, sadrul wrote: > > Thanks for ...
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 05:49:37 UTC) #6
viettrungluu
9 years, 11 months ago (2010-12-30 06:01:33 UTC) #7
Thanks for fixing the #includes.

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:49,  <sadrul@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 2010/12/30 05:40:03, viettrungluu wrote:
>>
>> On 2010/12/30 05:33:49, sadrul wrote:
>> > Thanks for the quick review!
>> >
>> > <string> is included via base/string_util.h
>
>> a) You probably shouldn't rely on transitive inclusions (unless all your
>> uses
>
> of
>>
>> std::string involve something from string_util.h).
>> b) It's not entirely obvious to my why string_util.h is included
>> c) ASCIIToUTF16() is declared in base/utf_string_conversions.h, whose
>
> inclusion
>>
>> is missing....
>
> Noted. Included <string> and base/utf_string_conversions.h and removed
> string_util.h since it doesn't seem to be necessary.
>
> http://codereview.chromium.org/6038006/
>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698