Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3097)

Unified Diff: base/lock.h

Issue 5630: Disallow Lock class support for recursive locking (Closed) Base URL: svn://chrome-svn/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: '' Created 12 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/lock.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/lock.h
===================================================================
--- base/lock.h (revision 3066)
+++ base/lock.h (working copy)
@@ -7,14 +7,16 @@
#include "base/lock_impl.h"
-// A convenient wrapper for a critical section.
+// A convenient wrapper for an OS specific critical section.
//
-// NOTE: A thread may acquire the same lock multiple times, but it must call
-// Release for each call to Acquire in order to finally release the lock.
+// NOTE: Although windows critical sections support recursive locks, we do not
+// allow this, and we will commonly fire a DCHECK() if a thread attempts to
+// acquire the lock a second time (while already holding it).
//
// Complication: UnitTest for DeathTests catch DCHECK exceptions, so we need
// to write code assuming DCHECK will throw. This means we need to save any
// assertable value in a local until we can safely throw.
+
class Lock {
public:
Lock();
@@ -22,7 +24,7 @@
void Acquire();
void Release();
// If the lock is not held, take it and return true. If the lock is already
- // held by something else, immediately return false.
+ // held by another thread, immediately return false.
bool Try();
// Return the underlying lock implementation.
@@ -33,20 +35,13 @@
private:
LockImpl lock_; // User-supplied underlying lock implementation.
- // All private data is implicitly protected by spin_lock_.
- // Be VERY careful to only access under that lock.
- int32 recursion_count_shadow_;
-
- // Allow access to GetCurrentThreadRecursionCount()
- friend class AutoUnlock;
- int32 GetCurrentThreadRecursionCount();
-
#ifndef NDEBUG
- // Even in Debug mode, the expensive tallies won't be calculated by default.
- bool recursion_used_;
- int32 acquisition_count_;
-
- int32 contention_count_;
+ // All private data is implicitly protected by lock_.
+ // Be VERY careful to only access members under that lock.
+ int32 recursion_count_shadow_;
+ bool recursion_used_; // Allow debugging to continued after a DCHECK().
+ int32 acquisition_count_; // Number of times lock was acquired.
+ int32 contention_count_; // Number of times there was contention.
#endif // NDEBUG
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(Lock);
@@ -68,27 +63,23 @@
DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(AutoLock);
};
-// AutoUnlock is a helper class for ConditionVariable instances
-// that is analogous to AutoLock. It provides for nested Releases
-// of a lock for the Wait functionality of a ConditionVariable class.
-// The destructor automatically does the corresponding Acquire
-// calls (to return to the initial nested lock state).
-
-// Instances of AutoUnlock can ***ONLY*** validly be constructed if the
-// caller currently holds the lock provided as the constructor's argument.
-// If that ***REQUIREMENT*** is violated in debug mode, a DCHECK will
-// be generated in the Lock class. In production (non-debug),
-// the results are undefined (and probably bad) if the caller
-// is not already holding the indicated lock.
+// AutoUnlock is a helper class for ConditionVariable that will Release() the
+// lock argument in the constructor, and re-Acquire() it in the destructor.
class ConditionVariable;
class AutoUnlock {
private: // Everything is private, so only our friend can use us.
friend class ConditionVariable; // The only user of this class.
- explicit AutoUnlock(Lock& lock);
- ~AutoUnlock();
+ explicit AutoUnlock(Lock& lock) : lock_(&lock) {
+ // We require our caller to have the lock.
+ lock_->Release();
+ }
+
+ ~AutoUnlock() {
+ lock_->Acquire();
+ }
+
Lock* lock_;
- int release_count_;
};
#endif // BASE_LOCK_H_
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | base/lock.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698