Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(6281)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc

Issue 5338004: Cleanup mock device management backend (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: merge with latest Created 10 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | chrome/browser/policy/device_token_fetcher_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
index 705b2288c5538e71b16413d8715bc5d76d3dcb45..1761e80ea60cd7b72cd0418f1f26421cd38aa2cc 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const char kTestToken[] = "device_policy_provider_test_auth_token";
namespace policy {
using ::testing::_;
+using ::testing::InSequence;
using ::testing::Mock;
class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
@@ -39,7 +40,6 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
void CreateNewBackend() {
backend_ = new MockDeviceManagementBackend;
- backend_->AddBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true);
}
void CreateNewProvider() {
@@ -61,9 +61,11 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
void SimulateSuccessfulInitialPolicyFetch() {
MockConfigurationPolicyStore store;
- backend_->AllShouldSucceed();
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedRegister());
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(
+ key::kDisableSpdy, true));
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(kPolicyDisableSpdy, _)).Times(1);
provider_->Provide(&store);
@@ -105,7 +107,6 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
// provide an empty policy.
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, InitialProvideNoLogin) {
MockConfigurationPolicyStore store;
- backend_->AllShouldSucceed();
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(_, _)).Times(0);
provider_->Provide(&store);
EXPECT_TRUE(store.policy_map().empty());
@@ -118,12 +119,13 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, InitialProvideWithLogin) {
SimulateSuccessfulInitialPolicyFetch();
}
-// If the login succeeds but the device management backend is unreachable,
+// If the login succeed but the device management backend is unreachable,
// there should be no policy provided if there's no previously-fetched policy,
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, EmptyProvideWithFailedBackend) {
MockConfigurationPolicyStore store;
- backend_->AllShouldFail();
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailRegister(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(0);
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(kPolicyDisableSpdy, _)).Times(0);
@@ -140,16 +142,19 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, SecondProvide) {
// Simulate a app relaunch by constructing a new provider. Policy should be
// refreshed (since that might be the purpose of the app relaunch).
CreateNewBackend();
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(
+ key::kDisableSpdy, true));
CreateNewProvider();
Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(backend_);
// Simulate another app relaunch, this time against a failing backend.
// Cached policy should still be available.
CreateNewBackend();
- backend_->AllShouldFail();
MockConfigurationPolicyStore store;
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailPolicy(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
CreateNewProvider();
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(kPolicyDisableSpdy, _)).Times(1);
@@ -170,18 +175,38 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, FetchTriggersRefresh) {
}
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, ErrorCausesNewRequest) {
- backend_->RegisterFailsOncePolicyFailsTwice();
+ InSequence s;
SetRefreshDelays(provider_.get(), 1000 * 1000, 0, 0, 0);
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(2);
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(3);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailRegister(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedRegister());
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailPolicy(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailPolicy(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true));
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
}
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, RefreshPolicies) {
- backend_->AllWorksFirstPolicyFailsLater();
+ InSequence s;
SetRefreshDelays(provider_.get(), 0, 0, 1000 * 1000, 1000);
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(1);
- EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).Times(4);
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedRegister());
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailPolicy(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
}
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | chrome/browser/policy/device_token_fetcher_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698