Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(6051)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc

Issue 5331008: Persist 'this device is not managed' information (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: port to ToT/5198006-ps14 Created 10 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
index 74979e96e240aeb69eb4a334b869452a29b0b3a0..6978b28f29378f04ebdcba68db4945f9b1f04132 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider_unittest.cc
@@ -2,11 +2,13 @@
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
+#include "base/file_util.h"
#include "base/message_loop.h"
#include "base/scoped_temp_dir.h"
#include "chrome/browser/browser_thread.h"
#include "chrome/browser/net/gaia/token_service.h"
#include "chrome/browser/policy/configuration_policy_pref_store.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_cache.h"
#include "chrome/browser/policy/device_management_policy_provider.h"
#include "chrome/browser/policy/mock_configuration_policy_store.h"
#include "chrome/browser/policy/mock_device_management_backend.h"
@@ -36,15 +38,13 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
virtual void SetUp() {
profile_.reset(new TestingProfile);
- CreateNewBackend();
CreateNewProvider();
- }
-
- void CreateNewBackend() {
- backend_ = new MockDeviceManagementBackend;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->WaitingForInitialPolicies());
+ loop_.RunAllPending();
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2010/11/26 15:07:30 indentation?
Jakob Kummerow 2010/11/26 16:04:03 Done.
}
void CreateNewProvider() {
+ backend_ = new MockDeviceManagementBackend;
provider_.reset(new DeviceManagementPolicyProvider(
ConfigurationPolicyPrefStore::GetChromePolicyDefinitionList(),
backend_,
@@ -53,7 +53,27 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
new TestingDeviceTokenFetcher(backend_,
profile_.get(),
provider_->GetTokenPath()));
- loop_.RunAllPending();
+ }
+
Mattias Nissler (ping if slow) 2010/11/26 15:07:30 whitespace.
Jakob Kummerow 2010/11/26 16:04:03 Done.
+ void CreateNewProvider(int64 policy_refresh_rate_ms,
+ int64 policy_refresh_max_earlier_ms,
+ int64 policy_refresh_error_delay_ms,
+ int64 token_fetch_error_delay_ms,
+ int64 unmanaged_device_refresh_rate_ms) {
+ backend_ = new MockDeviceManagementBackend;
+ provider_.reset(new DeviceManagementPolicyProvider(
+ ConfigurationPolicyPrefStore::GetChromePolicyDefinitionList(),
+ backend_,
+ profile_.get(),
+ policy_refresh_rate_ms,
+ policy_refresh_max_earlier_ms,
+ policy_refresh_error_delay_ms,
+ token_fetch_error_delay_ms,
+ unmanaged_device_refresh_rate_ms));
+ provider_->SetDeviceTokenFetcher(
+ new TestingDeviceTokenFetcher(backend_,
+ profile_.get(),
+ provider_->GetTokenPath()));
}
void SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending() {
@@ -75,6 +95,7 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(
key::kDisableSpdy, true));
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(provider_->WaitingForInitialPolicies());
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(kPolicyDisableSpdy, _)).Times(1);
provider_->Provide(&store);
ASSERT_EQ(1U, store.policy_map().size());
@@ -90,19 +111,13 @@ class DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
scoped_ptr<DeviceManagementPolicyProvider> provider_;
protected:
- void SetRefreshDelays(DeviceManagementPolicyProvider* provider,
- int64 policy_refresh_rate_ms,
- int64 policy_refresh_max_earlier_ms,
- int64 policy_refresh_error_delay_ms,
- int64 token_fetch_error_delay_ms) {
- provider->set_policy_refresh_rate_ms(policy_refresh_rate_ms);
- provider->set_policy_refresh_max_earlier_ms(policy_refresh_max_earlier_ms);
- provider->set_policy_refresh_error_delay_ms(policy_refresh_error_delay_ms);
- provider->set_token_fetch_error_delay_ms(token_fetch_error_delay_ms);
+ DeviceManagementPolicyCache* cache(DeviceManagementPolicyProvider* provider) {
+ return provider->cache_.get();
}
- private:
MessageLoop loop_;
+
+ private:
BrowserThread ui_thread_;
BrowserThread file_thread_;
scoped_ptr<Profile> profile_;
@@ -117,12 +132,14 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, InitialProvideNoLogin) {
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(_, _)).Times(0);
provider_->Provide(&store);
EXPECT_TRUE(store.policy_map().empty());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->WaitingForInitialPolicies());
}
// If the login is successful and there's no previously-fetched policy, the
// policy should be fetched from the server and should be available the first
// time the Provide method is called.
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, InitialProvideWithLogin) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider_->WaitingForInitialPolicies());
SimulateSuccessfulInitialPolicyFetch();
}
@@ -148,21 +165,21 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, SecondProvide) {
// Simulate a app relaunch by constructing a new provider. Policy should be
// refreshed (since that might be the purpose of the app relaunch).
- CreateNewBackend();
+ CreateNewProvider();
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(
key::kDisableSpdy, true));
- CreateNewProvider();
+ loop_.RunAllPending();
Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(backend_);
// Simulate another app relaunch, this time against a failing backend.
// Cached policy should still be available.
- CreateNewBackend();
MockConfigurationPolicyStore store;
+ CreateNewProvider();
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
MockDeviceManagementBackendFailPolicy(
DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
- CreateNewProvider();
+ loop_.RunAllPending();
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
EXPECT_CALL(store, Apply(kPolicyDisableSpdy, _)).Times(1);
provider_->Provide(&store);
@@ -183,7 +200,7 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, FetchTriggersRefresh) {
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, ErrorCausesNewRequest) {
InSequence s;
- SetRefreshDelays(provider_.get(), 1000 * 1000, 0, 0, 0);
+ CreateNewProvider(1000 * 1000, 0, 0, 0, 0);
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
MockDeviceManagementBackendFailRegister(
DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorRequestFailed));
@@ -202,7 +219,7 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, ErrorCausesNewRequest) {
TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, RefreshPolicies) {
InSequence s;
- SetRefreshDelays(provider_.get(), 0, 0, 1000 * 1000, 1000);
+ CreateNewProvider(0, 0, 1000 * 1000, 1000, 0);
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedRegister());
EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
@@ -249,4 +266,28 @@ TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, InvalidTokenOnPolicyRequest) {
SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
}
+// This test tests three things (see numbered comments below):
+TEST_F(DeviceManagementPolicyProviderTest, UnmanagedDevice) {
+ InSequence s;
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendFailRegister(
+ DeviceManagementBackend::kErrorServiceManagementNotSupported));
+ SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
+ // (1) The provider's DMPolicyCache should know that the device is not
+ // managed.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(cache(provider_.get())->is_device_unmanaged());
+ // (2) On restart, the provider should detect that this is not the first
+ // login.
+ CreateNewProvider(1000*1000, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(provider_->WaitingForInitialPolicies());
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessRegisterRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedRegister());
+ EXPECT_CALL(*backend_, ProcessPolicyRequest(_, _, _, _)).WillOnce(
+ MockDeviceManagementBackendSucceedBooleanPolicy(key::kDisableSpdy, true));
+ SimulateSuccessfulLoginAndRunPending();
+ // (3) Since the backend call this time returned a device id, the "unmanaged"
+ // marker should have been deleted.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(cache(provider_.get())->is_device_unmanaged());
+}
+
} // namespace policy

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698