Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(405)

Issue 5239001: [Sync] Make sync integration tests use local xmpp servers. (Closed)

Created:
10 years, 1 month ago by akalin
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, ncarter (slow), idana, cbentzel+watch_chromium.org, darin-cc_chromium.org, Paweł Hajdan Jr., tim (not reviewing), Raghu Simha
Visibility:
Public.

Description

[Sync] Make sync integration tests use local xmpp servers. Fixed signed/unsigned bug with the port number. BUG=53934 TEST=sync integration tests Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=67491

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : Synced to head #

Patch Set 3 : Fixed boundary check #

Patch Set 4 : Removed unneeded switch #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+36 lines, -17 lines) Patch
M chrome/test/live_sync/live_sync_test.cc View 1 2 3 4 chunks +21 lines, -13 lines 0 comments Download
M jingle/notifier/communicator/connection_settings.h View 2 chunks +2 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M jingle/notifier/communicator/connection_settings.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M net/test/test_server.h View 3 chunks +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M net/test/test_server.cc View 2 chunks +7 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5 (0 generated)
akalin
+cbentzel, +pawel, and +rsimha for review (this depends on http://codereview.chromium.org/5196001/ and http://codereview.chromium.org/5104004/ )
10 years, 1 month ago (2010-11-19 02:40:50 UTC) #1
Raghu Simha
live_sync changes LGTM.
10 years, 1 month ago (2010-11-19 03:22:11 UTC) #2
cbentzel
LGTM Pawel is the best person to decide whether server_data() should be added to the ...
10 years, 1 month ago (2010-11-19 15:46:24 UTC) #3
Paweł Hajdan Jr.
LGTM
10 years, 1 month ago (2010-11-19 20:56:15 UTC) #4
akalin
10 years ago (2010-11-27 04:38:53 UTC) #5
On 2010/11/19 15:46:24, cbentzel wrote:
> This is in two locations now - should you have an abstraction for getting a
port
> from the dictionaryvalue?

Yeah, although I'm not sure where the best place would be.  Will send out a
separate CL.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698