[ChromeOS] Remove PanelBrowserView::Init.

[ChromeOS] Remove PanelBrowserView::Init.

The window size handling in PanelBrowserView::Init seems no longer needed
and would cause problem now.

BUG=chromium-os:8258
TEST=Verify fix for chromium-os:8258.

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=64922

[xiyuan, 2010-11-01 17:16:35]

The change seems working fine with ToT ChromeOS:
- The 100x100 size issue in http://crosbug.com/8465 is gone;
- Unable to repro the 200x200 problem mentioned in comments. Hope it's no longer
an issue now :p
- It works fine with Oshima's popup test page;

Do we want to give it a try?

[oshima, 2010-11-01 20:07:11]

On 2010/11/01 17:16:35, xiyuan wrote:
> The change seems working fine with ToT ChromeOS:
> - The 100x100 size issue in http://crosbug.com/8465 is gone;
> - Unable to repro the 200x200 problem mentioned in comments. Hope it's no
longer
> an issue now :p
> - It works fine with Oshima's popup test page;
> 
> Do we want to give it a try?

sure, i'm fine if this work.
how did you test 200x200? we should at least test bigger/smaller window
many times.

[xiyuan, 2010-11-01 20:43:05]

On 2010/11/01 20:07:11, oshima wrote:
> On 2010/11/01 17:16:35, xiyuan wrote:
> > The change seems working fine with ToT ChromeOS:
> > - The 100x100 size issue in http://crosbug.com/8465 is gone;
> > - Unable to repro the 200x200 problem mentioned in comments. Hope it's no
> longer
> > an issue now :p
> > - It works fine with Oshima's popup test page;
> > 
> > Do we want to give it a try?
> 
> sure, i'm fine if this work.
> how did you test 200x200? we should at least test bigger/smaller window
> many times.

I tried your test page and file browse panel for about 50+ times each. But never
see the 200x200 problem.

[oshima, 2010-11-01 21:13:08]

On 2010/11/01 20:43:05, xiyuan wrote:
> On 2010/11/01 20:07:11, oshima wrote:
> > On 2010/11/01 17:16:35, xiyuan wrote:
> > > The change seems working fine with ToT ChromeOS:
> > > - The 100x100 size issue in http://crosbug.com/8465 is gone;
> > > - Unable to repro the 200x200 problem mentioned in comments. Hope it's no
> > longer
> > > an issue now :p
> > > - It works fine with Oshima's popup test page;
> > > 
> > > Do we want to give it a try?
> > 
> > sure, i'm fine if this work.
> > how did you test 200x200? we should at least test bigger/smaller window
> > many times.
> 
> I tried your test page and file browse panel for about 50+ times each. But
never
> see the 200x200 problem.

If you're talking about www/~oshima/test/test.html, that's not
the test page for this. You should test panels whose initial size
are larger and smaller than 200x200.

LGTM once you did these cases.

[xiyuan, 2010-11-01 23:17:27]

On 2010/11/01 21:13:08, oshima wrote:
> On 2010/11/01 20:43:05, xiyuan wrote:
> > On 2010/11/01 20:07:11, oshima wrote:
> > > On 2010/11/01 17:16:35, xiyuan wrote:
> > > > The change seems working fine with ToT ChromeOS:
> > > > - The 100x100 size issue in http://crosbug.com/8465 is gone;
> > > > - Unable to repro the 200x200 problem mentioned in comments. Hope it's
no
> > > longer
> > > > an issue now :p
> > > > - It works fine with Oshima's popup test page;
> > > > 
> > > > Do we want to give it a try?
> > > 
> > > sure, i'm fine if this work.
> > > how did you test 200x200? we should at least test bigger/smaller window
> > > many times.
> > 
> > I tried your test page and file browse panel for about 50+ times each. But
> never
> > see the 200x200 problem.
> 
> If you're talking about www/~oshima/test/test.html, that's not
> the test page for this. You should test panels whose initial size
> are larger and smaller than 200x200.
> 
> LGTM once you did these cases.

Tried with a popup test page for different popup sizes and so far works fine.
I'll get this in and have my finger crossed.