Update a couple tests for make functionality (working as intended).

test/subdirectory/gyptest-subdir-all.py

Index: test/subdirectory/gyptest-subdir-all.py
===================================================================
--- test/subdirectory/gyptest-subdir-all.py	(revision 726)
+++ test/subdirectory/gyptest-subdir-all.py	(working copy)
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 """
 
 import TestGyp
+import errno
 
 test = TestGyp.TestGyp()
 
@@ -18,12 +19,34 @@
 
 test.relocate('src', 'relocate/src')
 
-test.build('prog2.gyp', test.ALL, chdir='relocate/src/subdir')
+chdir = 'relocate/src/subdir'
+target = test.ALL
 
-test.must_not_exist('relocate/src/prog1'+test._exe)
+# Make can build sub-projects, but it's still through the top-level Makefile,
+# and there is no 'default' or 'all' sub-project, so the target must be
+# explicit.
+# TODO(mmoss) Should make create self-contained, sub-project Makefiles,

[Evan Martin, 2009/10/27 19:25:39]

s/Should/Should we/
?
Here and in the other file

[Michael Moss, 2009/10/27 19:38:10]

Actually, that's meant to read "Should (the) make (generator) create ...". I can
clarify.

+# equilvalent to the sub-project .sln/SConstruct/etc. files of other generators?
+if test.format == 'make':
+  chdir = 'relocate/src'
+  target = 'prog2'
 
+test.build('prog2.gyp', target, chdir=chdir)
+
+# 'prog1' shouldn't have been built, so it should throw a 'No such file or
+# directory' exception. If it does exist, running it should fail the stdout
+# match. This is clunky, but it's arguably less fragile than looking for the
+# different platform/generator-dependent paths.
+try:
+  test.run_built_executable('prog1',
+                            chdir=chdir,
+                            stdout="")
+except OSError, e:
+  if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+    raise e
+
 test.run_built_executable('prog2',
-                          chdir='relocate/src/subdir',
+                          chdir=chdir,
                           stdout="Hello from prog2.c\n")
 
 test.pass_test()