Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(136)

Issue 316010: Add fucomip instruction to disassembler. (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 2 months ago by William Hesse
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Lasse Reichstein
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Add fucomip instruction to disassembler. Fix some other floating point instructions. Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=3141

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Patch Set 3 : '' #

Patch Set 4 : '' #

Patch Set 5 : '' #

Total comments: 6

Patch Set 6 : '' #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+350 lines, -295 lines) Patch
M src/ia32/disasm-ia32.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 11 chunks +166 lines, -106 lines 0 comments Download
M src/x64/disasm-x64.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 19 chunks +184 lines, -189 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
William Hesse
11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-22 14:46:04 UTC) #1
Lasse Reichstein
LGTM
11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-23 07:39:52 UTC) #2
Lasse Reichstein
Still LGTM. http://codereview.chromium.org/316010/diff/9002/6004 File src/x64/disasm-x64.cc (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/316010/diff/9002/6004#newcode661 Line 661: assert(*data == 0xF7 || *data == ...
11 years, 1 month ago (2009-10-27 09:01:40 UTC) #3
William Hesse
11 years, 1 month ago (2009-10-27 10:47:56 UTC) #4
http://codereview.chromium.org/316010/diff/9002/6004
File src/x64/disasm-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/316010/diff/9002/6004#newcode661
Line 661: assert(*data == 0xF7 || *data == 0xF6);
On 2009/10/27 09:01:40, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> Shouldn't this be ASSERT? (I.e., using our own ASSERT, not the C++ assert.h
> library).

All asserts changed to ASSERT_EQ, ASSERT_NE, or ASSERT in both files.

http://codereview.chromium.org/316010/diff/9002/6004#newcode932
Line 932: case 0xD8: mnem = "fstp"; break;
On 2009/10/27 09:01:40, Lasse Reichstein wrote:
> Do we have a "fst" implementation?

That's a big "affirmative", partner.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698