Move bundled copy of sqlite one level deeper to better separate it...

third_party/sqlite/test/where4.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/test/where4.test
===================================================================
--- third_party/sqlite/test/where4.test	(revision 56608)
+++ third_party/sqlite/test/where4.test	(working copy)
@@ -1,273 +0,0 @@
-# 2006 October 27
-#
-# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
-# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
-#
-#    May you do good and not evil.
-#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
-#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-#
-#***********************************************************************
-# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
-# focus of this file is testing the use of indices in WHERE clauses.
-# This file was created when support for optimizing IS NULL phrases
-# was added.  And so the principle purpose of this file is to test
-# that IS NULL phrases are correctly optimized.  But you can never
-# have too many tests, so some other tests are thrown in as well.
-#
-# $Id: where4.test,v 1.6 2007/12/10 05:03:48 danielk1977 Exp $
-
-set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
-source $testdir/tester.tcl
-
-ifcapable !tclvar||!bloblit {
-  finish_test
-  return
-}
-
-# Build some test data
-#
-do_test where4-1.0 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE t1(w, x, y);
-    CREATE INDEX i1wxy ON t1(w,x,y);
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2,3);
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,NULL,3);
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a','b','c');
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a',NULL,'c');
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(X'78',x'79',x'7a');
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(X'78',NULL,X'7A');
-    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL,NULL,NULL);
-    SELECT count(*) FROM t1;
-  }
-} {7}
-
-# Do an SQL statement.  Append the search count to the end of the result.
-#
-proc count sql {
-  set ::sqlite_search_count 0
-  return [concat [execsql $sql] $::sqlite_search_count]
-}
-
-# Verify that queries use an index.  We are using the special variable
-# "sqlite_search_count" which tallys the number of executions of MoveTo
-# and Next operators in the VDBE.  By verifing that the search count is
-# small we can be assured that indices are being used properly.
-#
-do_test where4-1.1 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL}
-} {7 2}
-do_test where4-1.2 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE +w IS NULL}
-} {7 6}
-do_test where4-1.3 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL}
-} {2 2}
-do_test where4-1.4 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND +x IS NULL}
-} {2 3}
-do_test where4-1.5 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x>0}
-} {1 2}
-do_test where4-1.6 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x<9}
-} {1 3}
-do_test where4-1.7 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL AND y=3}
-} {2 2}
-do_test where4-1.8 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL AND y>2}
-} {2 2}
-do_test where4-1.9 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w='a' AND x IS NULL AND y='c'}
-} {4 2}
-do_test where4-1.10 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL}
-} {6 2}
-do_test where4-1.11 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL AND y=123}
-} {1}
-do_test where4-1.12 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL AND y=x'7A'}
-} {6 2}
-do_test where4-1.13 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL}
-} {7 2}
-do_test where4-1.14 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y IS NULL}
-} {7 2}
-do_test where4-1.15 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y<0}
-} {2}
-do_test where4-1.16 {
-  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y>=0}
-} {1}
-
-do_test where4-2.1 {
-  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w, x, y}
-} {7 2 1 4 3 6 5}
-do_test where4-2.2 {
-  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w DESC, x, y}
-} {6 5 4 3 2 1 7}
-do_test where4-2.3 {
-  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w, x DESC, y}
-} {7 1 2 3 4 5 6}
-
-
-# Ticket #2177
-#
-# Suppose you have a left join where the right table of the left
-# join (the one that can be NULL) has an index on two columns.
-# The first indexed column is used in the ON clause of the join.
-# The second indexed column is used in the WHERE clause with an IS NULL
-# constraint.  It is not allowed to use the IS NULL optimization to
-# optimize the query because the second column might be NULL because
-# the right table did not match - something the index does not know
-# about.
-#
-do_test where4-3.1 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE t2(a);
-    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1);
-    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2);
-    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3);
-    CREATE TABLE t3(x,y,UNIQUE(x,y));
-    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,11);
-    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2,NULL);
- 
-    SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t3 ON a=x WHERE +y IS NULL;
-  }
-} {2 2 {} 3 {} {}}
-do_test where4-3.2 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t3 ON a=x WHERE y IS NULL;
-  }
-} {2 2 {} 3 {} {}}
-
-# Ticket #2189.  Probably the same bug as #2177.
-#
-do_test where4-4.1 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE test(col1 TEXT PRIMARY KEY);
-    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('a');
-    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('b');
-    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('c');
-    CREATE TABLE test2(col1 TEXT PRIMARY KEY);
-    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('a');
-    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('b');
-    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('c');
-    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
-      WHERE +t2.col1 IS NULL;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test where4-4.2 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
-      WHERE t2.col1 IS NULL;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test where4-4.3 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
-      WHERE +t1.col1 IS NULL;
-  }
-} {}
-do_test where4-4.4 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
-      WHERE t1.col1 IS NULL;
-  }
-} {}
-
-# Ticket #2273.  Problems with IN operators and NULLs.
-#
-ifcapable subquery {
-do_test where4-5.1 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE t4(x,y,z,PRIMARY KEY(x,y));
-  }
-  execsql {
-    SELECT *
-      FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t4 b1
-              LEFT JOIN t4 b2 ON b2.x=b1.x AND b2.y IN (b1.y);
-  }
-} {1 {} {} {} {} {} {} 2 {} {} {} {} {} {} 3 {} {} {} {} {} {}}
-do_test where4-5.2 {
-  execsql {
-    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,1,11);
-    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,2,12);
-    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,3,13);
-    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(2,2,22);
-    SELECT rowid FROM t4 WHERE x IN (1,9,2,5) AND y IN (1,3,NULL,2) AND z!=13;
-  }
-} {1 2 4}
-do_test where4-5.3 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT rowid FROM t4 WHERE x IN (1,9,NULL,2) AND y IN (1,3,2) AND z!=13;
-  }
-} {1 2 4}
-do_test where4-6.1 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE t5(a,b,c,d,e,f,UNIQUE(a,b,c,d,e,f));
-    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1,1,1,1,1,11111);
-    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2,2,2,2,2,22222);
-    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1,2,3,4,5,12345);
-    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2,3,4,5,6,23456);
-  }
-  execsql {
-    SELECT rowid FROM t5
-     WHERE a IN (1,9,2) AND b=2 AND c IN (1,2,3,4) AND d>0
-  }
-} {3 2}
-do_test where4-6.2 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT rowid FROM t5
-     WHERE a IN (1,NULL,2) AND b=2 AND c IN (1,2,3,4) AND d>0
-  }
-} {3 2}
-do_test where4-7.1 {
-  execsql {
-    CREATE TABLE t6(y,z,PRIMARY KEY(y,z));
-  }
-  execsql {
-    SELECT * FROM t6 WHERE y=NULL AND z IN ('hello');
-  }
-} {}
-
-integrity_check {where4-99.0}
-
-do_test where4-7.1 {
-  execsql {
-    BEGIN;
-    CREATE TABLE t8(a, b, c, d);
-    CREATE INDEX t8_i ON t8(a, b, c);
-    CREATE TABLE t7(i);
-
-    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(1);
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
-
-    COMMIT;
-  }
-} {}
-
-# At one point the sub-select inside the aggregate sum() function in the
-# following query was leaking a couple of stack entries. This query 
-# runs the SELECT in a loop enough times that an assert() fails. Or rather,
-# did fail before the bug was fixed.
-#
-do_test where4-7.2 {
-  execsql {
-    SELECT sum((
-      SELECT d FROM t8 WHERE a = i AND b = i AND c < NULL
-    )) FROM t7;
-  }
-} {{}}
-
-}; #ifcapable subquery
-
-finish_test