[gcc] GCC 4.5.0=>4.5.1

gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c

Index: gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c
diff --git a/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c b/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c
index c89db2193ba4ab6cc3595034b15956c542c8c444..1a8c4ed433034e104c0807dc2af0c04252f2f338 100644
--- a/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c
+++ b/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/strict-overflow-4.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-fstrict-overflow -O2 -fdump-tree-final_cleanup" } */
+/* { dg-options "-fstrict-overflow -O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
 
 /* Source: Ian Lance Taylor.  Dual of no-strict-overflow-4.c.  */
 
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ foo (int i)
 
 /* We expect to see "<bb N>"; confirm that, so that we know to count
    it in the real test.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "<bb\[^>\]*>" 1 "final_cleanup" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times ">|<" 2 "final_cleanup" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "final_cleanup" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "<bb\[^>\]*>" 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times ">|<" 2 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */