Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(486)

Issue 303034: X64/Win64: Alternative implementation of fmod in general. (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 2 months ago by Lasse Reichstein
Modified:
9 years, 6 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Visibility:
Public.

Description

X64/Win64: Alternative implementation of fmod in general.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+226 lines, -28 lines) Patch
M src/conversions.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/conversions.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M src/conversions-inl.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M src/platform.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/platform-nullos.cc View 1 chunk +7 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/platform-posix.cc View 1 chunk +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/platform-win32.cc View 1 chunk +25 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M src/runtime.cc View 1 chunk +1 line, -8 lines 0 comments Download
M src/x64/assembler-x64.h View 2 chunks +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M src/x64/assembler-x64.cc View 2 chunks +9 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download
M src/x64/codegen-x64.cc View 1 chunk +89 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
M src/x64/disasm-x64.cc View 1 chunk +14 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M test/mjsunit/div-mod.js View 1 chunk +69 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Lasse Reichstein
Mads, is this an appropriate way to create new assembler code, or should I just ...
11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-22 11:15:20 UTC) #1
Mads Ager (chromium)
I think this approach is fine.
11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-22 11:30:02 UTC) #2
William Hesse
11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-23 07:45:14 UTC) #3
LGTM.

http://codereview.chromium.org/303034/diff/1/12
File src/x64/codegen-x64.cc (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/303034/diff/1/12#newcode7712
Line 7712: 
Put a comment in here that no relocatable addresses are used here, because only
the first two stages of creating a relocatable code object are run?  I.E. that
we are creating position-independent code?

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698