Update the ES5 conformance tests to the latest version and fix test...

Update the ES5 conformance tests to the latest version and fix test
expectations.

We are currently using a rather old version of the ES5 conformance
tests and there has been a range of bug fixes in the test set. This
change brings us up to date. 

In addition, our current test expectations discards the all chapters
but chapter 15. I have enabled the other chapters, cleaned up the
tests that we no longer fail on, and filed bugs for tests that we fail on.

It seems some of the bugs on the es5 conformance bug-tracker has been
fixed but not marked fixed. I will file bugs for the newly discovered
test bugs.


Committed: http://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=4970

[Erik Corry, 2010-06-28 11:15:43]

LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3
File test/es5conform/es5conform.status (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode39
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:39: # We are compatible with safary and
firefox.
Safari and Firefox

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode91
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:91: # Our Function object has a "arguments"
property which is used as a non
has a -> has an
non property -> non-property

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode96
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:96: # property in in the test.
non property and again below.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode230
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:230: # is no longer traversed.
Is this a wrong test?

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode252
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:252: # entries are added for non existing
entries smaller than lenght by
lenght -> length
non-existing -> nonexistent

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode257
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:257: # Wrong tests, path in test file is
wrong. This will chrash the test
chrash -> crash

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode275
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:275: # RegExp.prototype is not of type RegExp
- we are bug compatible with safari.
safari -> JSC
or Safari
and again below

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode291
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:291: # See
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=753
Please add a couple of words on the subject of the bug to jog people's memory.

[Rico, 2010-06-28 11:34:40]

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3
File test/es5conform/es5conform.status (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode39
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:39: # We are compatible with safary and
firefox.
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> Safari and Firefox

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode91
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:91: # Our Function object has a "arguments"
property which is used as a non
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> has a -> has an
> non property -> non-property

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode96
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:96: # property in in the test.
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> non property and again below.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode230
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:230: # is no longer traversed.
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> Is this a wrong test?
This test has actually been removed, I deleted the line.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode257
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:257: # Wrong tests, path in test file is
wrong. This will chrash the test
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> chrash -> crash

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode275
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:275: # RegExp.prototype is not of type RegExp
- we are bug compatible with safari.
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> safari -> JSC
> or Safari
> and again below

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/2840023/diff/1/3#newcode291
test/es5conform/es5conform.status:291: # See
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=753
On 2010/06/28 11:15:43, Erik Corry wrote:
> Please add a couple of words on the subject of the bug to jog people's memory.

Done.