Chromium Code Reviews| Index: chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc |
| =================================================================== |
| --- chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc (revision 47175) |
| +++ chrome/browser/ssl/ssl_policy.cc (working copy) |
| @@ -83,15 +83,6 @@ |
| } |
| } |
| -void SSLPolicy::DidDisplayInsecureContent(NavigationEntry* entry) { |
| - if (!entry) |
| - return; |
| - |
| - // TODO(abarth): We don't actually need to break the whole origin here, |
| - // but we can handle that in a later patch. |
| - DidRunInsecureContent(entry, entry->url().spec()); |
| -} |
| - |
| void SSLPolicy::DidRunInsecureContent(NavigationEntry* entry, |
| const std::string& security_origin) { |
| if (!entry) |
| @@ -101,16 +92,52 @@ |
| if (!site_instance) |
| return; |
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(GURL(security_origin).host(), |
| - site_instance->GetProcess()->id()); |
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(GURL(security_origin).host(), |
| + site_instance->GetProcess()->id()); |
| } |
| void SSLPolicy::OnRequestStarted(SSLRequestInfo* info) { |
| - if (net::IsCertStatusError(info->ssl_cert_status())) |
| - UpdateStateForUnsafeContent(info); |
| + // TODO(abarth): This mechanism is wrong. What we should be doing is sending |
| + // this information back through WebKit and out some FrameLoaderClient |
| + // methods. |
| + // |
| + // The behavior for HTTPS resources with cert errors should be as follows: |
| + // 1) If we don't know anything about this host (the one hosting the |
| + // resource), the resource load just fails. |
| + // 2) If the user has previously approved the same certificate error for |
| + // this host in a full-page interstitial, then we'll proceed with the |
| + // load. |
| + // 3) If we proceed with the load, we should treat the resources as if they |
| + // were loaded over HTTP, w.r.t. the display vs. run distinction above. |
| + // |
| + // However, right now we don't have the proper context to understand where |
| + // these resources will be used. Consequently, we're conservative and treat |
| + // them all like DidRunInsecureContent(). |
| + |
| + if (net::IsCertStatusError(info->ssl_cert_status())) { |
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(info->url().host(), info->child_id()); |
| + |
| + // TODO(abarth): We should eventually remove the main_frame_origin and |
| + // frame_origin properties. First, not every resource load is associated |
| + // with a frame, so they don't always make sense. Second, the |
| + // main_frame_origin is computed from the first_party_for_cookies, which has |
| + // been hacked to death to support third-party cookie blocking. |
| + |
| + if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME && |
| + info->resource_type() != ResourceType::SUB_FRAME) { |
| + // The frame's origin now contains mixed content and therefore is broken. |
| + OriginRanInsecureContent(info->frame_origin(), info->child_id()); |
| + } |
| + |
| + if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME) { |
| + // The main frame now contains a frame with mixed content. Therefore, we |
| + // mark the main frame's origin as broken too. |
| + OriginRanInsecureContent(info->main_frame_origin(), info->child_id()); |
| + } |
| + } |
| } |
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateEntry(NavigationEntry* entry) { |
| +void SSLPolicy::UpdateEntry(NavigationEntry* entry, TabContents* tab_contents) { |
| DCHECK(entry); |
| InitializeEntryIfNeeded(entry); |
| @@ -140,9 +167,15 @@ |
| // necessarily have site instances. Without a process, the entry can't |
| // possibly have mixed content. See bug http://crbug.com/12423. |
| if (site_instance && |
| - backend_->DidMarkHostAsBroken(entry->url().host(), |
| - site_instance->GetProcess()->id())) |
| - entry->ssl().set_has_mixed_content(); |
| + backend_->DidHostRunInsecureContent(entry->url().host(), |
| + site_instance->GetProcess()->id())) { |
| + entry->ssl().set_security_style(SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATION_BROKEN); |
| + entry->ssl().set_ran_mixed_content(); |
|
abarth-chromium
2010/05/14 22:29:39
It's a bit strange that things get renamed from "i
Peter Kasting
2010/05/14 22:33:11
I'd be happy to try for consistent naming if you h
abarth-chromium
2010/05/14 22:35:03
Sure. I think that's the path of least resistance
|
| + return; |
| + } |
| + |
| + if (tab_contents->displayed_insecure_content()) |
| + entry->ssl().set_displayed_mixed_content(); |
| } |
| //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// |
| @@ -207,33 +240,8 @@ |
| SECURITY_STYLE_AUTHENTICATED : SECURITY_STYLE_UNAUTHENTICATED); |
| } |
| -void SSLPolicy::MarkOriginAsBroken(const std::string& origin, int pid) { |
| +void SSLPolicy::OriginRanInsecureContent(const std::string& origin, int pid) { |
| GURL parsed_origin(origin); |
| - if (!parsed_origin.SchemeIsSecure()) |
| - return; |
| - |
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(parsed_origin.host(), pid); |
| + if (parsed_origin.SchemeIsSecure()) |
| + backend_->HostRanInsecureContent(parsed_origin.host(), pid); |
| } |
| - |
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateStateForMixedContent(SSLRequestInfo* info) { |
| - // TODO(abarth): This function isn't right because we need to remove |
| - // info->main_frame_origin(). |
| - |
| - if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME && |
| - info->resource_type() != ResourceType::SUB_FRAME) { |
| - // The frame's origin now contains mixed content and therefore is broken. |
| - MarkOriginAsBroken(info->frame_origin(), info->child_id()); |
| - } |
| - |
| - if (info->resource_type() != ResourceType::MAIN_FRAME) { |
| - // The main frame now contains a frame with mixed content. Therefore, we |
| - // mark the main frame's origin as broken too. |
| - MarkOriginAsBroken(info->main_frame_origin(), info->child_id()); |
| - } |
| -} |
| - |
| -void SSLPolicy::UpdateStateForUnsafeContent(SSLRequestInfo* info) { |
| - // This request as a broken cert, which means its host is broken. |
| - backend_->MarkHostAsBroken(info->url().host(), info->child_id()); |
| - UpdateStateForMixedContent(info); |
| -} |