Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2252)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider_unittest.cc

Issue 2027010: Preference provider implementation backed by JSON files in a directory. (Closed)
Patch Set: A few more fixes. Created 10 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/configuration_policy_provider.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3d4a2740ad4e30bd017803b7e10a924cae12612
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2010 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/file_util.h"
+#include "base/path_service.h"
+#include "base/string_util.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider.h"
+#include "chrome/browser/mock_configuration_policy_store.h"
+#include "chrome/common/json_value_serializer.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+class ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest : public testing::Test {
+ protected:
+ virtual void SetUp() {
+ // Determine the directory to use for testing.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(PathService::Get(base::DIR_TEMP, &test_dir_));
+ test_dir_ =
+ test_dir_.Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest"));
+
+ // Make sure the directory is fresh.
+ file_util::Delete(test_dir_, true);
+ file_util::CreateDirectory(test_dir_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(file_util::DirectoryExists(test_dir_));
+
+ // Create a fresh policy store mock.
+ policy_store_.reset(new MockConfigurationPolicyStore());
+ }
+
+ virtual void TearDown() {
+ // Clean up test directory.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(file_util::Delete(test_dir_, true));
+ ASSERT_FALSE(file_util::PathExists(test_dir_));
+ }
+
+ // JSON-encode a dictionary and write it to a file.
+ void WriteConfigFile(const DictionaryValue& dict,
+ const std::string& file_name) {
+ std::string data;
+ JSONStringValueSerializer serializer(&data);
+ serializer.Serialize(dict);
+ FilePath file_path(test_dir_.AppendASCII(file_name));
+ file_util::WriteFile(file_path, data.c_str(), data.size());
+ }
+
+ FilePath test_dir_;
+ scoped_ptr<MockConfigurationPolicyStore> policy_store_;
+};
+
+// The preferences dictionary is expected to be empty when there are no files to
+// load.
+TEST_F(ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest, ReadPrefsEmpty) {
+ ConfigDirPolicyProvider provider(test_dir_);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider.Provide(policy_store_.get()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_store_->policy_map().empty());
+}
+
+// Reading from a non-existent directory should result in an empty preferences
+// dictionary.
+TEST_F(ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest, ReadPrefsNonExistentDirectory) {
+ FilePath non_existent_dir(test_dir_.Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("not_there")));
+ ConfigDirPolicyProvider provider(non_existent_dir);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider.Provide(policy_store_.get()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(policy_store_->policy_map().empty());
+}
+
+// Test reading back a single preference value.
+TEST_F(ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest, ReadPrefsSinglePref) {
+ DictionaryValue test_dict;
+ test_dict.SetString(L"homepage", L"http://www.google.com");
+ WriteConfigFile(test_dict, "config_file");
+ ConfigDirPolicyProvider provider(test_dir_);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider.Provide(policy_store_.get()));
+ const MockConfigurationPolicyStore::PolicyMap& policy_map(
+ policy_store_->policy_map());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, policy_map.size());
+ MockConfigurationPolicyStore::PolicyMap::const_iterator entry =
+ policy_map.find(ConfigurationPolicyStore::kPolicyHomePage);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(entry != policy_map.end());
+
+ std::wstring str_value;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(entry->second->GetAsString(&str_value));
+ EXPECT_EQ(L"http://www.google.com", str_value);
+}
+
+// Test merging values from different files.
+TEST_F(ConfigDirPolicyProviderTest, ReadPrefsMergePrefs) {
+ // Write a bunch of data files in order to increase the chance to detect the
+ // provider not respecting lexicographic ordering when reading them. Since the
+ // filesystem may return files in arbitrary order, there is no way to be sure,
+ // but this is better than nothing.
+ DictionaryValue test_dict_bar;
+ test_dict_bar.SetString(L"homepage", L"http://bar.com");
+ for (unsigned int i = 1; i <= 4; ++i)
+ WriteConfigFile(test_dict_bar, IntToString(i));
+ DictionaryValue test_dict_foo;
+ test_dict_foo.SetString(L"homepage", L"http://foo.com");
+ WriteConfigFile(test_dict_foo, "9");
+ for (unsigned int i = 5; i <= 8; ++i)
+ WriteConfigFile(test_dict_bar, IntToString(i));
+ ConfigDirPolicyProvider provider(test_dir_);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(provider.Provide(policy_store_.get()));
+ const MockConfigurationPolicyStore::PolicyMap& policy_map(
+ policy_store_->policy_map());
+ EXPECT_EQ(1U, policy_map.size());
+ MockConfigurationPolicyStore::PolicyMap::const_iterator entry =
+ policy_map.find(ConfigurationPolicyStore::kPolicyHomePage);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(entry != policy_map.end());
+
+ std::wstring str_value;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(entry->second->GetAsString(&str_value));
+ EXPECT_EQ(L"http://foo.com", str_value);
+}
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/config_dir_policy_provider.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/configuration_policy_provider.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698