Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(35)

Unified Diff: base/message_loop.cc

Issue 1664: Put back r1891 with some task deletion disabled to maintain backwards compat... (Closed) Base URL: svn://chrome-svn/chrome/trunk/src/
Patch Set: '' Created 12 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « base/message_loop.h ('k') | base/message_loop_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/message_loop.cc
===================================================================
--- base/message_loop.cc (revision 1892)
+++ base/message_loop.cc (working copy)
@@ -100,26 +100,28 @@
FOR_EACH_OBSERVER(DestructionObserver, destruction_observers_,
WillDestroyCurrentMessageLoop());
- // OK, now make it so that no one can find us.
- tls_index_.Set(NULL);
-
DCHECK(!state_);
- // Most tasks that have not been Run() are deleted in the |timer_manager_|
- // destructor after we remove our tls index. We delete the tasks in our
- // queues here so their destuction is similar to the tasks in the
- // |timer_manager_|.
- DeletePendingTasks();
- ReloadWorkQueue();
- DeletePendingTasks();
-
- // Delete tasks in the delayed work queue.
- while (!delayed_work_queue_.empty()) {
- Task* task = delayed_work_queue_.top().task;
- delayed_work_queue_.pop();
- delete task;
+ // Clean up any unprocessed tasks, but take care: deleting a task could
+ // result in the addition of more tasks (e.g., via DeleteSoon). We set a
+ // limit on the number of times we will allow a deleted task to generate more
+ // tasks. Normally, we should only pass through this loop once or twice. If
+ // we end up hitting the loop limit, then it is probably due to one task that
+ // is being stubborn. Inspect the queues to see who is left.
+ bool did_work;
+ for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
+ DeletePendingTasks();
+ ReloadWorkQueue();
+ // If we end up with empty queues, then break out of the loop.
+ did_work = DeletePendingTasks();
+ if (!did_work)
+ break;
}
+ DCHECK(!did_work);
+ // OK, now make it so that no one can find us.
+ tls_index_.Set(NULL);
+
#if defined(OS_WIN)
// Match timeBeginPeriod() from construction.
timeEndPeriod(1);
@@ -312,6 +314,16 @@
return false;
}
+void MessageLoop::AddToDelayedWorkQueue(const PendingTask& pending_task) {
+ // Move to the delayed work queue. Initialize the sequence number
+ // before inserting into the delayed_work_queue_. The sequence number
+ // is used to faciliate FIFO sorting when two tasks have the same
+ // delayed_run_time value.
+ PendingTask new_pending_task(pending_task);
+ new_pending_task.sequence_num = next_sequence_num_++;
+ delayed_work_queue_.push(new_pending_task);
+}
+
void MessageLoop::ReloadWorkQueue() {
// We can improve performance of our loading tasks from incoming_queue_ to
// work_queue_ by waiting until the last minute (work_queue_ is empty) to
@@ -330,20 +342,35 @@
}
}
-void MessageLoop::DeletePendingTasks() {
- /* Comment this out as it's causing crashes.
- while (!work_queue_.Empty()) {
- Task* task = work_queue_.Pop();
- if (task->is_owned_by_message_loop())
- delete task;
+bool MessageLoop::DeletePendingTasks() {
+ bool did_work = !work_queue_.empty();
+ while (!work_queue_.empty()) {
+ PendingTask pending_task = work_queue_.front();
+ work_queue_.pop();
+ if (!pending_task.delayed_run_time.is_null()) {
+ // We want to delete delayed tasks in the same order in which they would
+ // normally be deleted in case of any funny dependencies between delayed
+ // tasks.
+ AddToDelayedWorkQueue(pending_task);
+ } else {
+ // TODO(darin): Delete all tasks once it is safe to do so.
+ //delete task;
+ }
}
-
- while (!delayed_non_nestable_queue_.Empty()) {
- Task* task = delayed_non_nestable_queue_.Pop();
- if (task->is_owned_by_message_loop())
- delete task;
+ did_work |= !deferred_non_nestable_work_queue_.empty();
+ while (!deferred_non_nestable_work_queue_.empty()) {
+ Task* task = deferred_non_nestable_work_queue_.front().task;
+ deferred_non_nestable_work_queue_.pop();
+ // TODO(darin): Delete all tasks once it is safe to do so.
+ //delete task;
}
- */
+ did_work |= !delayed_work_queue_.empty();
+ while (!delayed_work_queue_.empty()) {
+ Task* task = delayed_work_queue_.top().task;
+ delayed_work_queue_.pop();
+ delete task;
+ }
+ return did_work;
}
bool MessageLoop::DoWork() {
@@ -363,14 +390,7 @@
work_queue_.pop();
if (!pending_task.delayed_run_time.is_null()) {
bool was_empty = delayed_work_queue_.empty();
-
- // Move to the delayed work queue. Initialize the sequence number
- // before inserting into the delayed_work_queue_. The sequence number
- // is used to faciliate FIFO sorting when two tasks have the same
- // delayed_run_time value.
- pending_task.sequence_num = next_sequence_num_++;
- delayed_work_queue_.push(pending_task);
-
+ AddToDelayedWorkQueue(pending_task);
if (was_empty) // We only schedule the next delayed work item.
pump_->ScheduleDelayedWork(pending_task.delayed_run_time);
} else {
« no previous file with comments | « base/message_loop.h ('k') | base/message_loop_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698