Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(12)

Unified Diff: src/arm/codegen-arm.cc

Issue 1606019: Make binary op stubs in both r0-r1 and r1-r0 versions to reduce... (Closed) Base URL: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/
Patch Set: '' Created 10 years, 8 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/arm/codegen-arm.h ('k') | src/arm/full-codegen-arm.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/arm/codegen-arm.cc
===================================================================
--- src/arm/codegen-arm.cc (revision 4368)
+++ src/arm/codegen-arm.cc (working copy)
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@
case Token::SAR: {
frame_->EmitPop(r0); // r0 : y
frame_->EmitPop(r1); // r1 : x
- GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op, overwrite_mode, constant_rhs);
+ GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op, overwrite_mode, r1, r0, constant_rhs);
frame_->CallStub(&stub, 0);
break;
}
@@ -791,10 +791,11 @@
case Token::SHL:
case Token::SHR:
case Token::SAR: {
- frame_->PopToR1R0(); // Pop y to r0 and x to r1.
+ Register rhs = frame_->PopToRegister();
+ Register lhs = frame_->PopToRegister(rhs); // Don't pop to rhs register.
{
VirtualFrame::SpilledScope spilled_scope(frame_);
- GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op, overwrite_mode, constant_rhs);
+ GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op, overwrite_mode, lhs, rhs, constant_rhs);
frame_->CallStub(&stub, 0);
}
frame_->EmitPush(r0);
@@ -844,6 +845,8 @@
void DeferredInlineSmiOperation::Generate() {
+ Register lhs = r1;
+ Register rhs = r0;
switch (op_) {
case Token::ADD: {
// Revert optimistic add.
@@ -877,11 +880,23 @@
case Token::BIT_XOR:
case Token::BIT_AND: {
if (reversed_) {
- __ Move(r0, tos_register_);
- __ mov(r1, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ if (tos_register_.is(r0)) {
+ __ mov(r1, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ } else {
+ ASSERT(tos_register_.is(r1));
+ __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ lhs = r0;
+ rhs = r1;
+ }
} else {
- __ Move(r1, tos_register_);
- __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ if (tos_register_.is(r1)) {
+ __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ } else {
+ ASSERT(tos_register_.is(r0));
+ __ mov(r1, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ lhs = r0;
+ rhs = r1;
+ }
}
break;
}
@@ -890,8 +905,14 @@
case Token::SHR:
case Token::SAR: {
if (!reversed_) {
- __ Move(r1, tos_register_);
- __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ if (tos_register_.is(r1)) {
+ __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ } else {
+ ASSERT(tos_register_.is(r0));
+ __ mov(r1, Operand(Smi::FromInt(value_)));
+ lhs = r0;
+ rhs = r1;
+ }
} else {
UNREACHABLE(); // Should have been handled in SmiOperation.
}
@@ -904,7 +925,7 @@
break;
}
- GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op_, overwrite_mode_, value_);
+ GenericBinaryOpStub stub(op_, overwrite_mode_, lhs, rhs, value_);
__ CallStub(&stub);
// The generic stub returns its value in r0, but that's not
// necessarily what we want. We want whatever the inlined code
@@ -985,32 +1006,17 @@
if (!something_to_inline) {
if (!reversed) {
- // Move the lhs to r1.
- frame_->PopToR1();
- // Flush any other registers to the stack.
- frame_->SpillAll();
- // Tell the virtual frame that TOS is in r1 (no code emitted).
- frame_->EmitPush(r1);
- // We know that r0 is free.
- __ mov(r0, Operand(value));
- // Push r0 on the virtual frame (no code emitted).
- frame_->EmitPush(r0);
- // This likes having r1 and r0 on top of the stack. It pushes
- // the answer on the virtual frame.
+ Register rhs = frame_->GetTOSRegister();
+ __ mov(rhs, Operand(value));
+ frame_->EmitPush(rhs);
VirtualFrameBinaryOperation(op, mode, int_value);
} else {
// Move the rhs to r0.
Søren Thygesen Gjesse 2010/04/09 13:22:36 Does this comment still hold?
- frame_->PopToR0();
- // Flush any other registers to the stack.
- frame_->SpillAll();
- // We know that r1 is free.
- __ mov(r1, Operand(value));
- // Tell the virtual frame that TOS is in r1 (no code emitted).
- frame_->EmitPush(r1);
- // Push r0 on the virtual frame (no code emitted).
- frame_->EmitPush(r0);
- // This likes having r1 and r0 on top of the stack. It pushes
- // the answer on the virtual frame.
+ Register lhs = frame_->GetTOSRegister(); // Get reg for pushing.
+ Register rhs = frame_->PopToRegister(lhs); // Don't use lhs for this.
+ __ mov(lhs, Operand(value));
+ frame_->EmitPush(lhs);
+ frame_->EmitPush(rhs);
VirtualFrameBinaryOperation(op, mode, kUnknownIntValue);
}
return;
@@ -1091,7 +1097,7 @@
if (shift_value != 0) {
__ mov(scratch, Operand(scratch, LSL, shift_value));
}
- // check that the *unsigned* result fits in a smi
+ // check that the *signed* result fits in a smi
__ add(scratch2, scratch, Operand(0x40000000), SetCC);
deferred->Branch(mi);
break;
@@ -1107,7 +1113,7 @@
// - 0x40000000: this number would convert to negative when
// smi tagging these two cases can only happen with shifts
// by 0 or 1 when handed a valid smi
- __ and_(scratch2, scratch, Operand(0xc0000000), SetCC);
+ __ tst(scratch, Operand(0xc0000000));
deferred->Branch(ne);
break;
}
@@ -5780,13 +5786,18 @@
// to call the C-implemented binary fp operation routines we need to end up
// with the double precision floating point operands in r0 and r1 (for the
// value in r1) and r2 and r3 (for the value in r0).
-void GenericBinaryOpStub::HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(MacroAssembler* masm,
- Label* not_smi,
- const Builtins::JavaScript& builtin) {
+void GenericBinaryOpStub::HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(
+ MacroAssembler* masm,
+ Label* not_smi,
+ Register lhs,
+ Register rhs,
+ const Builtins::JavaScript& builtin) {
Label slow, slow_pop_2_first, do_the_call;
Label r0_is_smi, r1_is_smi, finished_loading_r0, finished_loading_r1;
bool use_fp_registers = CpuFeatures::IsSupported(VFP3) && Token::MOD != op_;
+ ASSERT((lhs.is(r0) && rhs.is(r1)) || lhs.is(r1) && rhs.is(r0));
+
if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode()) {
// Smi-smi case (overflow).
// Since both are Smis there is no heap number to overwrite, so allocate.
@@ -5797,20 +5808,20 @@
// using registers d7 and d6 for the double values.
if (use_fp_registers) {
CpuFeatures::Scope scope(VFP3);
- __ mov(r7, Operand(r0, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(r7, Operand(rhs, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
__ vmov(s15, r7);
__ vcvt_f64_s32(d7, s15);
- __ mov(r7, Operand(r1, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(r7, Operand(lhs, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
__ vmov(s13, r7);
__ vcvt_f64_s32(d6, s13);
} else {
- // Write Smi from r0 to r3 and r2 in double format. r6 is scratch.
- __ mov(r7, Operand(r0));
+ // Write Smi from rhs to r3 and r2 in double format. r6 is scratch.
+ __ mov(r7, Operand(rhs));
ConvertToDoubleStub stub1(r3, r2, r7, r6);
__ push(lr);
__ Call(stub1.GetCode(), RelocInfo::CODE_TARGET);
- // Write Smi from r1 to r1 and r0 in double format. r6 is scratch.
- __ mov(r7, Operand(r1));
+ // Write Smi from lhs to r1 and r0 in double format. r6 is scratch.
+ __ mov(r7, Operand(lhs));
ConvertToDoubleStub stub2(r1, r0, r7, r6);
__ Call(stub2.GetCode(), RelocInfo::CODE_TARGET);
__ pop(lr);
@@ -5821,6 +5832,10 @@
// We branch here if at least one of r0 and r1 is not a Smi.
__ bind(not_smi);
+ if (lhs.is(r0)) {
+ __ Swap(r0, r1, ip);
+ }
+
if (ShouldGenerateFPCode()) {
if (runtime_operands_type_ == BinaryOpIC::DEFAULT) {
switch (op_) {
@@ -6137,32 +6152,36 @@
// by the ES spec. If this is the case we do the bitwise op and see if the
// result is a Smi. If so, great, otherwise we try to find a heap number to
// write the answer into (either by allocating or by overwriting).
-// On entry the operands are in r0 and r1. On exit the answer is in r0.
-void GenericBinaryOpStub::HandleNonSmiBitwiseOp(MacroAssembler* masm) {
+// On entry the operands are in lhs and rhs. On exit the answer is in r0.
+void GenericBinaryOpStub::HandleNonSmiBitwiseOp(MacroAssembler* masm,
+ Register lhs,
+ Register rhs) {
Label slow, result_not_a_smi;
- Label r0_is_smi, r1_is_smi;
- Label done_checking_r0, done_checking_r1;
+ Label rhs_is_smi, lhs_is_smi;
+ Label done_checking_rhs, done_checking_lhs;
- __ tst(r1, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
- __ b(eq, &r1_is_smi); // It's a Smi so don't check it's a heap number.
- __ CompareObjectType(r1, r4, r4, HEAP_NUMBER_TYPE);
+ __ tst(lhs, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
+ __ b(eq, &lhs_is_smi); // It's a Smi so don't check it's a heap number.
+ __ CompareObjectType(lhs, r4, r4, HEAP_NUMBER_TYPE);
__ b(ne, &slow);
- GetInt32(masm, r1, r3, r5, r4, &slow);
- __ jmp(&done_checking_r1);
- __ bind(&r1_is_smi);
- __ mov(r3, Operand(r1, ASR, 1));
- __ bind(&done_checking_r1);
+ GetInt32(masm, lhs, r3, r5, r4, &slow);
+ __ jmp(&done_checking_lhs);
+ __ bind(&lhs_is_smi);
+ __ mov(r3, Operand(lhs, ASR, 1));
+ __ bind(&done_checking_lhs);
- __ tst(r0, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
- __ b(eq, &r0_is_smi); // It's a Smi so don't check it's a heap number.
- __ CompareObjectType(r0, r4, r4, HEAP_NUMBER_TYPE);
+ __ tst(rhs, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
+ __ b(eq, &rhs_is_smi); // It's a Smi so don't check it's a heap number.
+ __ CompareObjectType(rhs, r4, r4, HEAP_NUMBER_TYPE);
__ b(ne, &slow);
- GetInt32(masm, r0, r2, r5, r4, &slow);
- __ jmp(&done_checking_r0);
- __ bind(&r0_is_smi);
- __ mov(r2, Operand(r0, ASR, 1));
- __ bind(&done_checking_r0);
+ GetInt32(masm, rhs, r2, r5, r4, &slow);
+ __ jmp(&done_checking_rhs);
+ __ bind(&rhs_is_smi);
+ __ mov(r2, Operand(rhs, ASR, 1));
+ __ bind(&done_checking_rhs);
+ ASSERT(((lhs.is(r0) && rhs.is(r1)) || (lhs.is(r1) && rhs.is(r0))));
+
// r0 and r1: Original operands (Smi or heap numbers).
// r2 and r3: Signed int32 operands.
switch (op_) {
@@ -6201,15 +6220,15 @@
__ bind(&result_not_a_smi);
switch (mode_) {
case OVERWRITE_RIGHT: {
- __ tst(r0, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
+ __ tst(rhs, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(eq, &have_to_allocate);
- __ mov(r5, Operand(r0));
+ __ mov(r5, Operand(rhs));
break;
}
case OVERWRITE_LEFT: {
- __ tst(r1, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
+ __ tst(lhs, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(eq, &have_to_allocate);
- __ mov(r5, Operand(r1));
+ __ mov(r5, Operand(lhs));
break;
}
case NO_OVERWRITE: {
@@ -6240,8 +6259,8 @@
// If all else failed then we go to the runtime system.
__ bind(&slow);
- __ push(r1); // restore stack
- __ push(r0);
+ __ push(lhs); // restore stack
+ __ push(rhs);
switch (op_) {
case Token::BIT_OR:
__ InvokeBuiltin(Builtins::BIT_OR, JUMP_JS);
@@ -6371,14 +6390,18 @@
void GenericBinaryOpStub::Generate(MacroAssembler* masm) {
- // r1 : x
- // r0 : y
- // result : r0
+ // lhs_ : x
+ // rhs_ : y
+ // r0 : result
+ Register result = r0;
+ Register lhs = lhs_;
+ Register rhs = rhs_;
+
Søren Thygesen Gjesse 2010/04/09 13:22:36 How about having scratch registers here as well, a
// All ops need to know whether we are dealing with two Smis. Set up r2 to
// tell us that.
if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode()) {
- __ orr(r2, r1, Operand(r0)); // r2 = x | y;
+ __ orr(r2, lhs, Operand(rhs)); // r2 = x | y;
}
switch (op_) {
@@ -6387,6 +6410,10 @@
// Fast path.
if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode()) {
ASSERT(kSmiTag == 0); // Adjust code below.
+ // This code can't cope with other register allocations yet.
Søren Thygesen Gjesse 2010/04/09 13:22:36 Doesn't this assert apply for the GenericBinaryOpS
+ ASSERT(result.is(r0) &&
+ ((lhs.is(r0) && rhs.is(r1)) ||
+ (lhs.is(r1) && rhs.is(r0))));
__ tst(r2, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(ne, &not_smi);
__ add(r0, r1, Operand(r0), SetCC); // Add y optimistically.
@@ -6394,7 +6421,7 @@
__ Ret(vc);
__ sub(r0, r0, Operand(r1)); // Revert optimistic add.
}
- HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, Builtins::ADD);
+ HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, lhs, rhs, Builtins::ADD);
break;
}
@@ -6403,14 +6430,25 @@
// Fast path.
if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode()) {
ASSERT(kSmiTag == 0); // Adjust code below.
+ // This code can't cope with other register allocations yet.
Søren Thygesen Gjesse 2010/04/09 13:22:36 Ditto.
+ ASSERT(result.is(r0) &&
+ ((lhs.is(r0) && rhs.is(r1)) ||
+ (lhs.is(r1) && rhs.is(r0))));
__ tst(r2, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(ne, &not_smi);
- __ sub(r0, r1, Operand(r0), SetCC); // Subtract y optimistically.
- // Return if no overflow.
- __ Ret(vc);
- __ sub(r0, r1, Operand(r0)); // Revert optimistic subtract.
+ if (lhs.is(r1)) {
Søren Thygesen Gjesse 2010/04/09 13:22:36 Can't you just drop the if/else and use: __ sub(r
+ __ sub(r0, r1, Operand(r0), SetCC); // Subtract y optimistically.
+ // Return if no overflow.
+ __ Ret(vc);
+ __ sub(r0, r1, Operand(r0)); // Revert optimistic subtract.
+ } else {
+ __ sub(r0, r0, Operand(r1), SetCC); // Subtract y optimistically.
+ // Return if no overflow.
+ __ Ret(vc);
+ __ add(r0, r0, Operand(r1)); // Revert optimistic subtract.
+ }
}
- HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, Builtins::SUB);
+ HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, lhs, rhs, Builtins::SUB);
break;
}
@@ -6421,58 +6459,61 @@
__ tst(r2, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(ne, &not_smi);
// Remove tag from one operand (but keep sign), so that result is Smi.
- __ mov(ip, Operand(r0, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(ip, Operand(rhs, ASR, kSmiTagSize));
// Do multiplication
- __ smull(r3, r2, r1, ip); // r3 = lower 32 bits of ip*r1.
+ __ smull(r3, r2, lhs, ip); // r3 = lower 32 bits of ip*r1.
// Go slow on overflows (overflow bit is not set).
__ mov(ip, Operand(r3, ASR, 31));
__ cmp(ip, Operand(r2)); // no overflow if higher 33 bits are identical
__ b(ne, &slow);
// Go slow on zero result to handle -0.
__ tst(r3, Operand(r3));
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r3), LeaveCC, ne);
+ __ mov(result, Operand(r3), LeaveCC, ne);
__ Ret(ne);
// We need -0 if we were multiplying a negative number with 0 to get 0.
// We know one of them was zero.
- __ add(r2, r0, Operand(r1), SetCC);
- __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(0)), LeaveCC, pl);
+ __ add(r2, rhs, Operand(lhs), SetCC);
+ __ mov(result, Operand(Smi::FromInt(0)), LeaveCC, pl);
__ Ret(pl); // Return Smi 0 if the non-zero one was positive.
// Slow case. We fall through here if we multiplied a negative number
// with 0, because that would mean we should produce -0.
__ bind(&slow);
}
- HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, Builtins::MUL);
+ HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(masm, &not_smi, lhs, rhs, Builtins::MUL);
break;
}
case Token::DIV:
case Token::MOD: {
Label not_smi;
- if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode()) {
+ if (ShouldGenerateSmiCode() && specialized_on_rhs_) {
Label smi_is_unsuitable;
- __ BranchOnNotSmi(r1, &not_smi);
+ __ BranchOnNotSmi(lhs, &not_smi);
if (IsPowerOf2(constant_rhs_)) {
if (op_ == Token::MOD) {
- __ and_(r0,
- r1,
+ __ and_(rhs,
+ lhs,
Operand(0x80000000u | ((constant_rhs_ << kSmiTagSize) - 1)),
SetCC);
// We now have the answer, but if the input was negative we also
// have the sign bit. Our work is done if the result is
// positive or zero:
+ if (!rhs.is(r0)) {
+ __ mov(r0, rhs, LeaveCC, pl);
+ }
__ Ret(pl);
// A mod of a negative left hand side must return a negative number.
// Unfortunately if the answer is 0 then we must return -0. And we
- // already optimistically trashed r0 so we may need to restore it.
- __ eor(r0, r0, Operand(0x80000000u), SetCC);
+ // already optimistically trashed rhs so we may need to restore it.
+ __ eor(rhs, rhs, Operand(0x80000000u), SetCC);
// Next two instructions are conditional on the answer being -0.
- __ mov(r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(constant_rhs_)), LeaveCC, eq);
+ __ mov(rhs, Operand(Smi::FromInt(constant_rhs_)), LeaveCC, eq);
__ b(eq, &smi_is_unsuitable);
// We need to subtract the dividend. Eg. -3 % 4 == -3.
- __ sub(r0, r0, Operand(Smi::FromInt(constant_rhs_)));
+ __ sub(result, rhs, Operand(Smi::FromInt(constant_rhs_)));
} else {
ASSERT(op_ == Token::DIV);
- __ tst(r1,
+ __ tst(lhs,
Operand(0x80000000u | ((constant_rhs_ << kSmiTagSize) - 1)));
__ b(ne, &smi_is_unsuitable); // Go slow on negative or remainder.
int shift = 0;
@@ -6481,12 +6522,12 @@
d >>= 1;
shift++;
}
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r1, LSR, shift));
+ __ mov(r0, Operand(lhs, LSR, shift));
__ bic(r0, r0, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
}
} else {
// Not a power of 2.
- __ tst(r1, Operand(0x80000000u));
+ __ tst(lhs, Operand(0x80000000u));
__ b(ne, &smi_is_unsuitable);
// Find a fixed point reciprocal of the divisor so we can divide by
// multiplying.
@@ -6503,27 +6544,27 @@
}
mul++;
__ mov(r2, Operand(mul));
- __ umull(r3, r2, r2, r1);
+ __ umull(r3, r2, r2, lhs);
__ mov(r2, Operand(r2, LSR, shift - 31));
- // r2 is r1 / rhs. r2 is not Smi tagged.
- // r0 is still the known rhs. r0 is Smi tagged.
- // r1 is still the unkown lhs. r1 is Smi tagged.
+ // r2 is lhs / rhs. r2 is not Smi tagged.
+ // rhs is still the known rhs. rhs is Smi tagged.
+ // lhs is still the unkown lhs. lhs is Smi tagged.
int required_r4_shift = 0; // Including the Smi tag shift of 1.
- // r4 = r2 * r0.
+ // r4 = r2 * rhs.
MultiplyByKnownInt2(masm,
r4,
r2,
- r0,
+ rhs,
constant_rhs_,
&required_r4_shift);
// r4 << required_r4_shift is now the Smi tagged rhs * (r1 / rhs).
if (op_ == Token::DIV) {
- __ sub(r3, r1, Operand(r4, LSL, required_r4_shift), SetCC);
+ __ sub(r3, lhs, Operand(r4, LSL, required_r4_shift), SetCC);
__ b(ne, &smi_is_unsuitable); // There was a remainder.
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r2, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(result, Operand(r2, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
} else {
ASSERT(op_ == Token::MOD);
- __ sub(r0, r1, Operand(r4, LSL, required_r4_shift));
+ __ sub(result, lhs, Operand(r4, LSL, required_r4_shift));
}
}
__ Ret();
@@ -6532,6 +6573,8 @@
HandleBinaryOpSlowCases(
masm,
&not_smi,
+ lhs,
+ rhs,
op_ == Token::MOD ? Builtins::MOD : Builtins::DIV);
break;
}
@@ -6547,44 +6590,44 @@
__ tst(r2, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
__ b(ne, &slow);
switch (op_) {
- case Token::BIT_OR: __ orr(r0, r0, Operand(r1)); break;
- case Token::BIT_AND: __ and_(r0, r0, Operand(r1)); break;
- case Token::BIT_XOR: __ eor(r0, r0, Operand(r1)); break;
+ case Token::BIT_OR: __ orr(result, rhs, Operand(lhs)); break;
+ case Token::BIT_AND: __ and_(result, rhs, Operand(lhs)); break;
+ case Token::BIT_XOR: __ eor(result, rhs, Operand(lhs)); break;
case Token::SAR:
// Remove tags from right operand.
- __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, r0, 5);
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r1, ASR, r2));
+ __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, rhs, 5);
+ __ mov(result, Operand(lhs, ASR, r2));
// Smi tag result.
- __ bic(r0, r0, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
+ __ bic(result, result, Operand(kSmiTagMask));
break;
case Token::SHR:
// Remove tags from operands. We can't do this on a 31 bit number
// because then the 0s get shifted into bit 30 instead of bit 31.
- __ mov(r3, Operand(r1, ASR, kSmiTagSize)); // x
- __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, r0, 5);
+ __ mov(r3, Operand(lhs, ASR, kSmiTagSize)); // x
+ __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, rhs, 5);
__ mov(r3, Operand(r3, LSR, r2));
// Unsigned shift is not allowed to produce a negative number, so
// check the sign bit and the sign bit after Smi tagging.
__ tst(r3, Operand(0xc0000000));
__ b(ne, &slow);
// Smi tag result.
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r3, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(result, Operand(r3, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
break;
case Token::SHL:
// Remove tags from operands.
- __ mov(r3, Operand(r1, ASR, kSmiTagSize)); // x
- __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, r0, 5);
+ __ mov(r3, Operand(lhs, ASR, kSmiTagSize)); // x
+ __ GetLeastBitsFromSmi(r2, rhs, 5);
__ mov(r3, Operand(r3, LSL, r2));
// Check that the signed result fits in a Smi.
__ add(r2, r3, Operand(0x40000000), SetCC);
__ b(mi, &slow);
- __ mov(r0, Operand(r3, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
+ __ mov(result, Operand(r3, LSL, kSmiTagSize));
break;
default: UNREACHABLE();
}
__ Ret();
__ bind(&slow);
- HandleNonSmiBitwiseOp(masm);
+ HandleNonSmiBitwiseOp(masm, lhs, rhs);
break;
}
« no previous file with comments | « src/arm/codegen-arm.h ('k') | src/arm/full-codegen-arm.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698