Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2)

Issue 159641: Add Linux package building target. (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 4 months ago by Michael Moss
Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
jon, Evan Martin
CC:
chromium-reviews_googlegroups.com
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Add Linux package building target. Also rearrange installer targets with better grouping for easier reading.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+172 lines, -121 lines) Patch
M build/all.gyp View 1 chunk +7 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M chrome/installer/installer.gyp View 3 chunks +165 lines, -121 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
Michael Moss
11 years, 4 months ago (2009-07-30 16:49:29 UTC) #1
Evan Martin
Though I admit I don't fully understand it, LGTM http://codereview.chromium.org/159641/diff/1/3 File chrome/installer/installer.gyp (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/159641/diff/1/3#newcode497 Line ...
11 years, 4 months ago (2009-07-30 17:06:52 UTC) #2
Michael Moss
11 years, 4 months ago (2009-07-30 17:15:40 UTC) #3
On 2009/07/30 17:06:52, Evan Martin wrote:
> Though I admit I don't fully understand it, LGTM

Sorry, I should have described the purpose better. This is meant to replace the
current packaging process, which involves manually running a script on the
buildbot output. Now the build will generate the packages directly (for official
builds only), as both Mac and Win do. This should further automate the release
process and save some effort.

> http://codereview.chromium.org/159641/diff/1/3
> File chrome/installer/installer.gyp (right):
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/159641/diff/1/3#newcode497
> Line 497: 'process_outputs_as_sources': 1,
> I believe this is flag is only meaningful when you generate .cc/.s files.

Apparently it's needed to actually trigger the actions (I discovered this after
many hours trying to figure out why the packaging script would never run -- sgk
eventually came up with this as the fix).

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698