Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(358)

Side by Side Diff: test/mozilla/mozilla.status

Issue 12427: Merge regexp2000 back into bleeding_edge (Closed) Base URL: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/
Patch Set: Created 12 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
« test/cctest/test-regexp.cc ('K') | « test/mjsunit/unicode-test.js ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 # Copyright 2008 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. 1 # Copyright 2008 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
2 # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 2 # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
3 # modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 3 # modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
4 # met: 4 # met:
5 # 5 #
6 # * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 6 # * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
7 # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 7 # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
8 # * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above 8 # * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
9 # copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following 9 # copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
10 # disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided 10 # disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
(...skipping 199 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
210 210
211 #:=== RegExp:=== 211 #:=== RegExp:===
212 # To be compatible with KJS we silently ignore flags that do not make 212 # To be compatible with KJS we silently ignore flags that do not make
213 # sense. This test expects us to throw exceptions. 213 # sense. This test expects us to throw exceptions.
214 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-57631: FAIL_OK 214 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-57631: FAIL_OK
215 215
216 # PCRE doesn't allow subpattern nesting deeper than 200, this tests 216 # PCRE doesn't allow subpattern nesting deeper than 200, this tests
217 # depth 500. KJS detects the case, and return null from the match, 217 # depth 500. KJS detects the case, and return null from the match,
218 # and passes this test (the test doesn't check for a correct return 218 # and passes this test (the test doesn't check for a correct return
219 # value). 219 # value).
220 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: FAIL_OK 220 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-119909: PASS || FAIL_OK
221 221
222 222
223 # Difference in the way capturing subpatterns work. In JS, when the 223 # Difference in the way capturing subpatterns work. In JS, when the
224 # 'minimum repeat count' is reached, the empty string must not match. 224 # 'minimum repeat count' is reached, the empty string must not match.
225 # In this case, we are similar but not identical to KJS. Hard to 225 # In this case, we are similar but not identical to KJS. Hard to
226 # support the JS behavior with PCRE, so maybe emulate KJS? 226 # support the JS behavior with PCRE, so maybe emulate KJS?
227 # 227 #
228 # Note: We do not support toSource currently so we cannot run this 228 # Note: We do not support toSource currently so we cannot run this
229 # test. We should make an isolated test case for the regexp issue. 229 # test. We should make an isolated test case for the regexp issue.
230 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-209919: FAIL_OK 230 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-209919: FAIL_OK
231 231
232 232
233 # PCRE's match limit is reached. SpiderMonkey hangs on the first one, 233 # PCRE's match limit is reached. SpiderMonkey hangs on the first one,
234 # KJS returns true somehow. Maybe they up the match limit? There is 234 # KJS returns true somehow. Maybe they up the match limit? There is
235 # an open V8 bug 676063 about this. 235 # an open V8 bug 676063 about this.
236 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-330684: FAIL_OK 236 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-330684: FAIL_OK
237 237
238 238
239 # This test contains a regexp that runs exponentially long. Spidermonkey
240 # standalone will hang, though apparently inside Firefox it will trigger a
241 # long-running-script timeout. JSCRE passes by hitting the matchLimit and
242 # just pretending that an exhaustive search found no match.
243 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-307456: PASS || FAIL_OK
244
245
239 # We do not detect overflow in bounds for back references and {} 246 # We do not detect overflow in bounds for back references and {}
240 # quantifiers. Might fix by parsing numbers differently? 247 # quantifiers. Might fix by parsing numbers differently?
241 js1_5/Regress/regress-230216-2: FAIL_OK 248 js1_5/Regress/regress-230216-2: FAIL_OK
242 249
243 250
244 # According to ECMA-262, \b is a 'word' boundary, where words are only 251 # According to ECMA-262, \b is a 'word' boundary, where words are only
245 # ASCII characters. PCRE supports non-ASCII word characters. 252 # ASCII characters. PCRE supports non-ASCII word characters.
246 js1_5/Regress/regress-247179: FAIL_OK 253 js1_5/Regress/regress-247179: FAIL_OK
247 254
248 255
249 # Regexp too long for PCRE. 256 # Regexp too long for PCRE.
250 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: FAIL_OK 257 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769: PASS || FAIL
251 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: FAIL_OK 258 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-1: PASS || FAIL
252 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: FAIL_OK 259 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-2: PASS || FAIL
253 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: FAIL_OK 260 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-4: PASS || FAIL
254 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: FAIL_OK 261 js1_5/Regress/regress-280769-5: PASS || FAIL
255 262
256 263
257 # We do not support static RegExp.multiline - should we?. 264 # We do not support static RegExp.multiline - should we?.
258 js1_2/regexp/RegExp_multiline: FAIL_OK 265 js1_2/regexp/RegExp_multiline: FAIL_OK
259 js1_2/regexp/RegExp_multiline_as_array: FAIL_OK 266 js1_2/regexp/RegExp_multiline_as_array: FAIL_OK
260 js1_2/regexp/beginLine: FAIL_OK 267 js1_2/regexp/beginLine: FAIL_OK
261 js1_2/regexp/endLine: FAIL_OK 268 js1_2/regexp/endLine: FAIL_OK
262 269
263 270
264 # Date trouble? 271 # Date trouble?
(...skipping 217 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
482 489
483 # Expects top level arguments (passed on command line?) to be 490 # Expects top level arguments (passed on command line?) to be
484 # the empty string? 491 # the empty string?
485 js1_5/Regress/regress-336100: FAIL_OK 492 js1_5/Regress/regress-336100: FAIL_OK
486 493
487 494
488 # Regular expression test failures due to PCRE. We match KJS (ie, perl) 495 # Regular expression test failures due to PCRE. We match KJS (ie, perl)
489 # behavior and not the ECMA spec. 496 # behavior and not the ECMA spec.
490 ecma_3/RegExp/15.10.2-1: FAIL_OK 497 ecma_3/RegExp/15.10.2-1: FAIL_OK
491 ecma_3/RegExp/perlstress-001: FAIL_OK 498 ecma_3/RegExp/perlstress-001: FAIL_OK
492 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: FAIL_OK 499 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-334158: PASS || FAIL
493 500
494 501
495 # This test requires a failure if we try to compile a function with more 502 # This test requires a failure if we try to compile a function with more
496 # than 65536 arguments. This seems to be a Mozilla restriction. 503 # than 65536 arguments. This seems to be a Mozilla restriction.
497 js1_5/Regress/regress-290575: FAIL_OK 504 js1_5/Regress/regress-290575: FAIL_OK
498 505
499 506
500 # Fails because of the way function declarations are 507 # Fails because of the way function declarations are
501 # handled in V8/KJS. V8 follows IE behavior and introduce 508 # handled in V8/KJS. V8 follows IE behavior and introduce
502 # all nested function declarations when entering the 509 # all nested function declarations when entering the
(...skipping 286 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
789 ecma/Date/15.9.5.8: SKIP 796 ecma/Date/15.9.5.8: SKIP
790 ecma/Date/15.9.5.9: SKIP 797 ecma/Date/15.9.5.9: SKIP
791 ecma/Date/15.9.5.10-2: SKIP 798 ecma/Date/15.9.5.10-2: SKIP
792 ecma/Date/15.9.5.11-2: SKIP 799 ecma/Date/15.9.5.11-2: SKIP
793 ecma/Expressions/11.7.2: SKIP 800 ecma/Expressions/11.7.2: SKIP
794 ecma/Expressions/11.10-2: SKIP 801 ecma/Expressions/11.10-2: SKIP
795 ecma/Expressions/11.7.3: SKIP 802 ecma/Expressions/11.7.3: SKIP
796 ecma/Expressions/11.10-3: SKIP 803 ecma/Expressions/11.10-3: SKIP
797 ecma/Expressions/11.7.1: SKIP 804 ecma/Expressions/11.7.1: SKIP
798 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-209067: SKIP 805 ecma_3/RegExp/regress-209067: SKIP
OLDNEW
« test/cctest/test-regexp.cc ('K') | « test/mjsunit/unicode-test.js ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698