Retry to checkin a version of gmock, modified to use our boost_tuple in VS2005.

testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc

Index: testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84e5a413ab447194d5f0a14b9a67ef89b05d95cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,1651 @@
+// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+
+// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
+//
+// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script.
+
+#include <gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h>
+
+#include <functional>
+#include <string>
+#include <gmock/gmock.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace testing {
+namespace gmock_generated_actions_test {
+
+using ::std::plus;
+using ::std::string;
+using ::std::tr1::get;
+using ::std::tr1::make_tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple;
+using ::std::tr1::tuple_element;
+using testing::_;
+using testing::Action;
+using testing::ActionInterface;
+using testing::ByRef;
+using testing::DeleteArg;
+using testing::DoAll;
+using testing::Invoke;
+using testing::InvokeArgument;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::ReturnNew;
+using testing::SaveArg;
+using testing::SetArgReferee;
+using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
+using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
+using testing::Unused;
+using testing::WithArg;
+using testing::WithArgs;
+using testing::WithoutArgs;
+
+// Sample functions and functors for testing Invoke() and etc.
+int Nullary() { return 1; }
+
+class NullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  int operator()() { return 2; }
+};
+
+bool g_done = false;
+void VoidNullary() { g_done = true; }
+
+class VoidNullaryFunctor {
+ public:
+  void operator()() { g_done = true; }
+};
+
+bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
+
+const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
+
+void VoidUnary(int n) { g_done = true; }
+
+bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
+
+const double g_double = 0;
+bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
+
+string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
+
+struct UnaryFunctor {
+  int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
+};
+
+const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
+
+int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
+
+void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
+
+int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
+
+int SumOfFirst2(int a, int b, Unused, Unused) { return a + b; }
+
+void VoidFunctionWithFourArguments(char, int, float, double) { g_done = true; }
+
+string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4;
+}
+
+int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+struct SumOf5Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5;
+}
+
+int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+  return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+}
+
+struct SumOf6Functor {
+  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+};
+
+string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6;
+}
+
+string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
+}
+
+string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
+}
+
+string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+               const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
+}
+
+string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
+                const char* s10) {
+  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
+}
+
+class Foo {
+ public:
+  Foo() : value_(123) {}
+
+  int Nullary() const { return value_; }
+
+  short Unary(long x) { return static_cast<short>(value_ + x); }  // NOLINT
+
+  string Binary(const string& str, char c) const { return str + c; }
+
+  int Ternary(int x, bool y, char z) { return value_ + x + y*z; }
+
+  int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) const {
+    return a + b + c + d + value_;
+  }
+
+  int SumOfLast2(Unused, Unused, int a, int b) const { return a + b; }
+
+  int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
+
+  int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
+    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
+  }
+
+  string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
+  }
+
+  string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7, const char* s8) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
+  }
+
+  string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                 const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                 const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
+  }
+
+  string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
+                  const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
+                  const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
+                  const char* s10) {
+    return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
+  }
+ private:
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a nullary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Nullary) {
+  Action<int()> a = Invoke(Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a unary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Unary) {
+  Action<bool(int)> a = Invoke(Unary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1)));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(-1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a binary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Binary) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*, short)> a = Invoke(Binary);  // NOLINT
+  const char* p = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(p + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(p, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a ternary function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Ternary) {
+  Action<int(int, char, short)> a = Invoke(Ternary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, '\2', 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes4Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes5Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf5);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes6Arguments) {
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(SumOf6);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes7Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(Concat7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes8Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(Concat8);
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes9Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument function.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(Concat10);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6",
+                                               "7", "8", "9", "0")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with functions with parameters declared as Unused.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithUnusedParameters) {
+  Action<int(int, int, double, const string&)> a1 =
+      Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10, 2, 5.6, "hi")));
+
+  Action<int(int, int, bool, int*)> a2 =
+      Invoke(SumOfFirst2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(make_tuple(20, 3, true, static_cast<int*>(NULL))));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with methods with parameters declared as Unused.
+TEST(InvokeTest, MethodWithUnusedParameters) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(string, bool, int, int)> a1 =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12, a1.Perform(make_tuple("hi", true, 10, 2)));
+
+  Action<int(char, double, int, int)> a2 =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOfLast2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(23, a2.Perform(make_tuple('a', 2.5, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a functor.
+TEST(InvokeTest, Functor) {
+  Action<int(short, char)> a = Invoke(plus<short>());  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
+TEST(InvokeTest, FunctionWithCompatibleType) {
+  Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a = Invoke(SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(4321, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, 300, 20, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with an object pointer and a method pointer.
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a nullary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Nullary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int()> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Nullary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a unary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Unary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<short(long)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Unary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(4123, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a binary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Binary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const string&, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Binary);
+  string s("Hell");
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello", a.Perform(make_tuple(s, 'o')));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a ternary method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, Ternary) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, bool, char)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Ternary);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1124, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, true, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 4-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes4Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1357, a.Perform(make_tuple(1000, 200, 30, 4)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 5-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes5Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf5);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 6-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes6Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<int(int, int, int, int, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 7-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes7Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat7);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 8-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes8Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat8);
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 9-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes9Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat9);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789",
+            a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke() with a 10-argument method.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a = Invoke(&foo, &Foo::Concat10);
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6",
+                                               "7", "8", "9", "0")));
+}
+
+// Tests using Invoke(f) as an action of a compatible type.
+TEST(InvokeMethodTest, MethodWithCompatibleType) {
+  Foo foo;
+  Action<long(int, short, char, bool)> a =  // NOLINT
+      Invoke(&foo, &Foo::SumOf4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(4444, a.Perform(make_tuple(4000, 300, 20, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests ByRef().
+
+// Tests that ReferenceWrapper<T> is copyable.
+TEST(ByRefTest, IsCopyable) {
+  const string s1 = "Hi";
+  const string s2 = "Hello";
+
+  ::testing::internal::ReferenceWrapper<const string> ref_wrapper = ByRef(s1);
+  const string& r1 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s1, &r1);
+
+  // Assigns a new value to ref_wrapper.
+  ref_wrapper = ByRef(s2);
+  const string& r2 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s2, &r2);
+
+  ::testing::internal::ReferenceWrapper<const string> ref_wrapper1 = ByRef(s1);
+  // Copies ref_wrapper1 to ref_wrapper.
+  ref_wrapper = ref_wrapper1;
+  const string& r3 = ref_wrapper;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&s1, &r3);
+}
+
+// Tests using ByRef() on a const value.
+TEST(ByRefTest, ConstValue) {
+  const int n = 0;
+  // int& ref = ByRef(n);  // This shouldn't compile - we have a
+                           // negative compilation test to catch it.
+  const int& const_ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &const_ref);
+}
+
+// Tests using ByRef() on a non-const value.
+TEST(ByRefTest, NonConstValue) {
+  int n = 0;
+
+  // ByRef(n) can be used as either an int&,
+  int& ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &ref);
+
+  // or a const int&.
+  const int& const_ref = ByRef(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &const_ref);
+}
+
+struct Base {
+  bool operator==(const Base&) { return true; }
+};
+
+struct Derived : public Base {
+  bool operator==(const Derived&) { return true; }
+};
+
+// Tests explicitly specifying the type when using ByRef().
+TEST(ByRefTest, ExplicitType) {
+  int n = 0;
+  const int& r1 = ByRef<const int>(n);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, &r1);
+
+  // ByRef<char>(n);  // This shouldn't compile - we have a negative
+                      // compilation test to catch it.
+
+
+  Derived d;
+  Derived& r2 = ByRef<Derived>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r2);
+
+  const Derived& r3 = ByRef<const Derived>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r3);
+
+  Base& r4 = ByRef<Base>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r4);
+
+  const Base& r5 = ByRef<const Base>(d);
+  EXPECT_EQ(&d, &r5);
+
+  // The following shouldn't compile - we have a negative compilation
+  // test for it.
+  //
+  // Base b;
+  // ByRef<Derived>(b);
+}
+
+// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...).
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) {
+  Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>();  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) {
+  Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true);  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) {
+  Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) {
+  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) {
+  Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8");
+  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
+  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) {
+  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                          const char*))> a =
+      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0");
+  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), 1);
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char*
+// by passing it a C-string literal.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) {
+  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", 1);
+  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi"));
+  // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary
+  // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the
+  // temporary object has already died.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
+}
+
+// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a
+// const reference.
+TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) {
+  Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a =  // NOLINT
+      InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double));
+  // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value.
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+
+  double x = 0;
+  a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x));  // This calls ByRef() on a non-const.
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithoutArgs with an action that takes no argument.
+TEST(WithoutArgsTest, NoArg) {
+  Action<int(int n)> a = WithoutArgs(Invoke(Nullary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs and WithArg with an action that takes 1 argument.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+
+  // Also tests the synonym WithArg.
+  Action<bool(double x, int n)> b = WithArg<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
+
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
+  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, int n)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(s, 0.5, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) {
+  Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4));
+  EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", 2.5, "3", "4")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*,
+                const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5));
+  EXPECT_EQ("43210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3", "4")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8));
+  EXPECT_EQ("01230123", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9));
+  EXPECT_EQ("012312323", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
+  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10));
+  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123", a.Perform(make_tuple("0", "1", "2", "3")));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
+class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {  // NOLINT
+ public:
+  virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) {
+    return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args);
+  }
+};
+
+TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
+  Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction));
+  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(make_tuple("hi", 2, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
+  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 20, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
+  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
+  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
+  const char s[] = "Hello";
+  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, s)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
+  Action<long(short x, int y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
+      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 20, 5.6, 3)));
+}
+
+// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
+TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
+  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
+  g_done = false;
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) {
+  int n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                              Return(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3).
+TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
+                                    SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+                                    Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char ch = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5).
+TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7).
+TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8).
+TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9).
+TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+}
+
+// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10).
+TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
+  int m = 0, n = 0;
+  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
+  char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0';
+  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
+             char*, char*, char*)> action =
+      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
+            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
+            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
+            SetArgumentPointee<8>('g'),
+            Return(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
+  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
+  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
+  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
+  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
+  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
+  EXPECT_EQ('g', g);
+}
+
+// Tests the ACTION*() macro family.
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the
+// mock function arguments.
+ACTION(Return5) { return 5; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) {
+  Action<double()> a1 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5();
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void.
+ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) {
+  Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the
+// argument.
+ACTION(IncrementArg2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>();
+  arg2_type temp = arg2;
+  (*temp)++;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) {
+  Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2();
+  int n = 0;
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple
+// via args_type and args.
+ACTION(Sum2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq< ::std::tr1::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
+  args_type args_copy = args;
+  return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) {
+  Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2();
+  int dummy = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, static_cast<char>(6), &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function
+// type.
+int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; }
+
+ACTION(InvokeDummy) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>();
+  function_type* fp = &Dummy;
+  return (*fp)(true);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's
+// return type.
+ACTION(InvokeDummy2) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>();
+  return_type result = Dummy(true);
+  return result;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) {
+  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>();
+  return &arg1;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg();
+  const bool b = false;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference.
+ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) {
+  StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>();
+  return &arg0;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) {
+  Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg();
+  int n = 0;
+  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace.
+namespace action_test {
+ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }
+}  // namespace action_test
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
+  Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum();
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with
+// different argument numbers.
+ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; }
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo();
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
+
+  Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo();
+  int dummy;
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action.
+ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) {
+  Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types
+// and the parameter type.
+ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) {
+  arg0_type t1 = arg0;
+  n_type t2 = n;
+  return t1 + t2;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
+  Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(static_cast<char>(1), true)));
+}
+
+// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function
+// whose type is compatible.
+TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) {
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the
+// number of parameters.
+
+ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; }
+
+ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) {
+  return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value;
+}
+
+ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) {
+  return arg0 ? true_value : false_value;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) {
+  typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction;
+
+  const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction();
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+
+  const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+
+  const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you");
+  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, "world")));
+  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, "world")));
+}
+
+// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3.
+
+ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) {
+  Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4);
+  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true)));
+
+  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">");
+  const std::string re = "re";
+  EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; }
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
+  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
+  arg0_type t0 = arg0;
+  last_param_type t9 = last_param;
+  return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) {
+  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10,
+            a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
+}
+
+// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types.
+
+ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) {
+  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
+  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
+  char suffix_char(suffix);
+  return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo =
+      PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r');
+  Action<std::string(const char*)> promo =
+      PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r'));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple("ba")));
+  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple("ba")));
+}
+
+// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a
+// straight-forward pattern.
+
+// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its
+// parameters.
+ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) {
+  std::stringstream ss;
+  ss << a << b << c;
+  return ss.str();
+}
+
+// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a
+// string, or the second parameter is an int.
+
+// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first
+// parameter to std::string.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to
+// implement ConcatImpl.  We shouldn't change the name as this
+// pattern requires the user to use it directly.
+ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2>
+Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) {
+  if (true) {
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without
+    // explicit template arguments.
+    return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+  } else {
+    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with
+    // explicit template arguments.  It doesn't really need to be
+    // executed as this is a compile-time verification.
+    return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c);
+  }
+}
+
+// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the
+// second parameter to int.
+template <typename T1, typename T2>
+ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2>
+Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) {
+  return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) {
+  Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+
+  a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3);
+  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Verifies the type of an ACTION*.
+
+ACTION(DoFoo) {}
+ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {}
+ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
+  // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable.
+  DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo();
+
+  // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable.
+  DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1);
+
+  // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk
+  // variable, and so on.
+  DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2');
+  PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3');
+  PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4');
+  PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
+  PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
+  PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
+  PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
+  PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
+  PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
+      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
+}
+
+// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated
+// with reference-typed parameters.
+
+ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; }
+ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; }
+ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; }
+ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) {
+  return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) {
+  int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3;
+  const tuple<> empty = make_tuple();
+
+  Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z);
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty));
+
+  int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
+  a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&,
+      int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7],
+                              n[8], n[9]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty));
+}
+
+TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
+  int result = 0;
+  const Action<void(int n)> a1 = SaveArg<0>(&result);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5));
+  EXPECT_EQ(5, result);
+}
+
+TEST(SaveArgActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
+  int result = 0;
+  const Action<void(bool, char)> a1 = SaveArg<1>(&result);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 'a'));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', result);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForSameType) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<0>(1);
+  a1.Perform(tuple<int&>(value));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, value);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksForCompatibleType) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(int, int&)> a1 = SetArgReferee<1>('a');
+  a1.Perform(tuple<int, int&>(0, value));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
+}
+
+TEST(SetArgRefereeActionTest, WorksWithExtraArguments) {
+  int value = 0;
+  const Action<void(bool, int, int&, const char*)> a1 = SetArgReferee<2>('a');
+  a1.Perform(tuple<bool, int, int&, const char*>(true, 0, value, "hi"));
+  EXPECT_EQ('a', value);
+}
+
+class NullaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  NullaryConstructorClass() : value_(123) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) {
+  Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>();
+  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class UnaryConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  explicit UnaryConstructorClass(int value) : value_(value) {}
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
+  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5));
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) {
+  Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
+  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+class TenArgConstructorClass {
+ public:
+  TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5,
+                         int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10)
+    : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) {
+  }
+  int value_;
+};
+
+// Tests using ReturnNew() with a 10-argument constructor.
+TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) {
+  Action<TenArgConstructorClass*()> a =
+      ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000,
+                                        4000000, 500000, 60000,
+                                        7000, 800, 90, 0);
+  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_);
+  delete c;
+}
+
+// A class that can be used to verify that its destructor is called: it will set
+// the bool provided to the constructor to true when destroyed.
+class DeletionTester {
+ public:
+  explicit DeletionTester(bool* is_deleted)
+    : is_deleted_(is_deleted) {
+    // Make sure the bit is set to false.
+    *is_deleted_ = false;
+  }
+
+  ~DeletionTester() {
+    *is_deleted_ = true;
+  }
+
+ private:
+  bool* is_deleted_;
+};
+
+TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, OneArg) {
+  bool is_deleted = false;
+  DeletionTester* t = new DeletionTester(&is_deleted);
+  const Action<void(DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<0>();      // NOLINT
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(t));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
+}
+
+TEST(DeleteArgActionTest, TenArgs) {
+  bool is_deleted = false;
+  DeletionTester* t = new DeletionTester(&is_deleted);
+  const Action<void(bool, int, int, const char*, bool,
+                    int, int, int, int, DeletionTester*)> a1 = DeleteArg<9>();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(is_deleted);
+  a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, 5, 6, "hi", false, 7, 8, 9, 10, t));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(is_deleted);
+}
+
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInVoidFunction) {
+  const Action<void(int n)> a = Throw('a');
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple(0)), char);
+}
+
+class MyException {};
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNonVoidFunction) {
+  const Action<double(char ch)> a = Throw(MyException());
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple('0')), MyException);
+}
+
+TEST(ThrowActionTest, ThrowsGivenExceptionInNullaryFunction) {
+  const Action<double()> a = Throw(MyException());
+  EXPECT_THROW(a.Perform(make_tuple()), MyException);
+}
+
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  return new T;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>();
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) {
+  return new T(a0);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
+  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42);
+  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+  delete p;
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k),
+                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
+  delete std::tr1::get<k>(args);
+}
+
+// Resets a bool variable in the destructor.
+class BoolResetter {
+ public:
+  explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {}
+  ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; }
+ private:
+  bool* const value_;
+};
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) {
+  const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>();
+  int n = 0;
+  bool b = true;
+  BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b);
+  a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(b);  // Verifies that resetter is deleted.
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class,
+                                      Pointer),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) {
+  return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee));
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42);
+  linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters.
+template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5,
+          unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9>
+struct GiantTemplate {
+ public:
+  explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {}
+  int value;
+};
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant,
+                HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(
+                    typename, T1,
+                    typename, T2,
+                    typename, T3,
+                    int, k4,
+                    bool, k5,
+                    unsigned int, k6,
+                    class, T7,
+                    class, T8,
+                    class, T9,
+                    template <typename T> class, T10),
+                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) {
+  return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value);
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) {
+  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
+  typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5,
+      true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant;
+  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<
+      int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42);
+  Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple());
+  EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value);
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters.
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
+  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded
+// on the number of value parameters.
+
+ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; }
+
+ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; }
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
+                AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3;
+}
+
+ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
+                HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k),
+                AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) {
+  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k;
+}
+
+TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) {
+  const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum();
+  const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1);
+  const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2);
+  const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3);
+  const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5);
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple()));
+  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple()));
+}
+
+}  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
+}  // namespace testing