Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3076)

Unified Diff: base/gmock_unittest.cc

Issue 115846: Retry to checkin a version of gmock, modified to use our boost_tuple in VS2005. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 11 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « base/base.gyp ('k') | build/all.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: base/gmock_unittest.cc
diff --git a/base/gmock_unittest.cc b/base/gmock_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..855380a97596903f1571739b884b29bc545cc04b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/base/gmock_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2009 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+//
+// This test is a simple sanity check to make sure gmock is able to build/link
+// correctly. It just instantiates a mock object and runs through a couple of
+// the basic mock features.
+
+#include "testing/gmock/include/gmock/gmock.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+// Gmock matchers and actions that we use below.
+using testing::AnyOf;
+using testing::Eq;
+using testing::Return;
+using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
+using testing::WithArg;
+using testing::_;
+
+namespace {
+
+// Simple class that we can mock out the behavior for. Everything is virtual
+// for easy mocking.
+class SampleClass {
+ public:
+ SampleClass() {}
+ virtual ~SampleClass() {}
+
+ virtual int ReturnSomething() {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ virtual void ReturnNothingConstly() const {
+ }
+
+ virtual void OutputParam(int* a) {
+ }
+
+ virtual int ReturnSecond(int a, int b) {
+ return b;
+ }
+};
+
+// Declare a mock for the class.
+class MockSampleClass : public SampleClass {
+ public:
+ MOCK_METHOD0(ReturnSomething, int());
+ MOCK_CONST_METHOD0(ReturnNothingConstly, void());
+ MOCK_METHOD1(OutputParam, void(int* a));
+ MOCK_METHOD2(ReturnSecond, int(int a, int b));
+};
+
+// Create a couple of custom actions. Custom actions can be used for adding
+// more complex behavior into your mock...though if you start needing these, ask
+// if you're asking your mock to do too much.
+ACTION(ReturnVal) {
+ // Return the first argument received.
+ return arg0;
+}
+ACTION(ReturnSecond) {
+ // Returns the second argument. This basically implemetns ReturnSecond.
+ return arg1;
+}
+
+TEST(GmockTest, SimpleMatchAndActions) {
+ // Basic test of some simple gmock matchers, actions, and cardinality
+ // expectations.
+ MockSampleClass mock;
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnSomething())
+ .WillOnce(Return(1))
+ .WillOnce(Return(2))
+ .WillOnce(Return(3));
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, mock.ReturnSomething());
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, mock.ReturnSomething());
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, mock.ReturnSomething());
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnNothingConstly()).Times(2);
+ mock.ReturnNothingConstly();
+ mock.ReturnNothingConstly();
+}
+
+TEST(GmockTest, AssignArgument) {
+ // Capture an argument for examination.
+ MockSampleClass mock;
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, OutputParam(_))
+ .WillRepeatedly(SetArgumentPointee<0>(5));
+
+ int arg = 0;
+ mock.OutputParam(&arg);
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, arg);
+}
+
+TEST(GmockTest, SideEffects) {
+ // Capture an argument for examination.
+ MockSampleClass mock;
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, OutputParam(_))
+ .WillRepeatedly(SetArgumentPointee<0>(5));
+
+ int arg = 0;
+ mock.OutputParam(&arg);
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, arg);
+}
+
+TEST(GmockTest, CustomAction_ReturnSecond) {
+ // Test a mock of the ReturnSecond behavior using an action that provides an
+ // alternate implementation of the function. Danger here though, this is
+ // starting to add too much behavior of the mock, which means the mock
+ // implementation might start to have bugs itself.
+ MockSampleClass mock;
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnSecond(_, AnyOf(Eq(4), Eq(5))))
+ .WillRepeatedly(ReturnSecond());
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(-1, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.ReturnSecond(0, 5));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(0xdeadbeef, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(112358, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.ReturnSecond(1337, 5));
+}
+
+TEST(GmockTest, CustomAction_ReturnVal) {
+ // Alternate implemention of ReturnSecond using a more general custom action,
+ // and a WithArg adapter to bridge the interfaces.
+ MockSampleClass mock;
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(mock, ReturnSecond(_, AnyOf(Eq(4), Eq(5))))
+ .WillRepeatedly(WithArg<1>(ReturnVal()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(-1, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.ReturnSecond(0, 5));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(0xdeadbeef, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, mock.ReturnSecond(112358, 4));
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, mock.ReturnSecond(1337, 5));
+}
+
+} // namespace
« no previous file with comments | « base/base.gyp ('k') | build/all.gyp » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698