FYI: Remove PerModelSafeGroupState + move ConflictResolution

sync/sessions/status_controller_unittest.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include "sync/sessions/sync_session.h"
 #include "sync/test/engine/test_id_factory.h"
 #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
 
 namespace syncer {
 namespace sessions {
 
 class StatusControllerTest : public testing::Test {
  public:
   virtual void SetUp() {
     routes_[BOOKMARKS] = GROUP_UI;
   }
  protected:
   ModelSafeRoutingInfo routes_;
 };
 
 // This test is useful, as simple as it sounds, due to the copy-paste prone
 // nature of status_controller.cc (we have had bugs in the past where a set_foo
 // method was actually setting |bar_| instead!).
 TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, ReadYourWrites) {
   StatusController status(routes_);
   status.set_num_server_changes_remaining(13);
   EXPECT_EQ(13, status.num_server_changes_remaining());
 
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflicts_resolved());
-  status.update_conflicts_resolved(true);
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.conflicts_resolved());
-
   status.set_last_download_updates_result(SYNCER_OK);
   EXPECT_EQ(SYNCER_OK,
             status.model_neutral_state().last_download_updates_result);
 
   status.set_commit_result(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR);
   EXPECT_EQ(SYNC_AUTH_ERROR, status.model_neutral_state().commit_result);
 
   for (int i = 0; i < 14; i++)
     status.increment_num_successful_commits();
   EXPECT_EQ(14, status.model_neutral_state().num_successful_commits);
 }
 
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
-        syncable::Id());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_SIMPLE,
-        syncable::Id());
-    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
-  }
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-  }
-}
-
-TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, HasConflictingUpdates_NonBlockingUpdates) {
-  StatusController status(routes_);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.update_progress());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(SUCCESS,
-        syncable::Id());
-    status.mutable_update_progress()->AddAppliedUpdate(CONFLICT_HIERARCHY,
-        syncable::Id());
-    EXPECT_TRUE(status.update_progress()->HasConflictingUpdates());
-  }
-
-  EXPECT_TRUE(status.HasConflictingUpdates());
-}
-
 TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, CountUpdates) {
   StatusController status(routes_);
   EXPECT_EQ(0, status.CountUpdates());
   sync_pb::ClientToServerResponse* response(status.mutable_updates_response());
   sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity1 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
   sync_pb::SyncEntity* entity2 = response->mutable_get_updates()->add_entries();
   ASSERT_TRUE(entity1 != NULL && entity2 != NULL);
   EXPECT_EQ(2, status.CountUpdates());
 }
 
 // Test TotalNumConflictingItems
 TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, TotalNumConflictingItems) {
   StatusController status(routes_);
-  TestIdFactory f;
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_UI);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
-  }
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
-  {
-    ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(&status, GROUP_DB);
-    EXPECT_FALSE(status.conflict_progress());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    status.mutable_conflict_progress()->
-        AddSimpleConflictingItemById(f.NewLocalId());
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status.conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
-  }
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
+
+  status.increment_num_server_conflicts();
+  status.increment_num_hierarchy_conflicts_by(3);
+  status.increment_num_encryption_conflicts_by(2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(6, status.TotalNumConflictingItems());
 }
 
 // Basic test that non group-restricted state accessors don't cause violations.
 TEST_F(StatusControllerTest, Unrestricted) {
   StatusController status(routes_);
-  const UpdateProgress* progress =
-      status.GetUnrestrictedUpdateProgress(GROUP_UI);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(progress);
   status.model_neutral_state();
   status.download_updates_succeeded();
   status.ServerSaysNothingMoreToDownload();
   status.group_restriction();
 }
 
 }  // namespace sessions
 }  // namespace syncer