| OLD | NEW |
| (Empty) |
| 1 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | |
| 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | |
| 3 // found in the LICENSE file. | |
| 4 | |
| 5 #include "sync/engine/verify_updates_command.h" | |
| 6 | |
| 7 #include <string> | |
| 8 | |
| 9 #include "base/location.h" | |
| 10 #include "sync/engine/syncer.h" | |
| 11 #include "sync/engine/syncer_proto_util.h" | |
| 12 #include "sync/engine/syncer_types.h" | |
| 13 #include "sync/engine/syncer_util.h" | |
| 14 #include "sync/internal_api/public/engine/model_safe_worker.h" | |
| 15 #include "sync/protocol/bookmark_specifics.pb.h" | |
| 16 #include "sync/protocol/sync.pb.h" | |
| 17 #include "sync/syncable/entry.h" | |
| 18 #include "sync/syncable/mutable_entry.h" | |
| 19 #include "sync/syncable/syncable_proto_util.h" | |
| 20 #include "sync/syncable/write_transaction.h" | |
| 21 | |
| 22 namespace syncer { | |
| 23 | |
| 24 using syncable::GET_BY_ID; | |
| 25 using syncable::SYNCER; | |
| 26 using syncable::WriteTransaction; | |
| 27 | |
| 28 namespace { | |
| 29 | |
| 30 // This function attempts to determine whether or not this update is genuinely | |
| 31 // new, or if it is a reflection of one of our own commits. | |
| 32 // | |
| 33 // There is a known inaccuracy in its implementation. If this update ends up | |
| 34 // being applied to a local item with a different ID, we will count the change | |
| 35 // as being a non-reflection update. Fortunately, the server usually updates | |
| 36 // our IDs correctly in its commit response, so a new ID during GetUpdate should | |
| 37 // be rare. | |
| 38 // | |
| 39 // The only secnarios I can think of where this might happen are: | |
| 40 // - We commit a new item to the server, but we don't persist the | |
| 41 // server-returned new ID to the database before we shut down. On the GetUpdate | |
| 42 // following the next restart, we will receive an update from the server that | |
| 43 // updates its local ID. | |
| 44 // - When two attempts to create an item with identical UNIQUE_CLIENT_TAG values | |
| 45 // collide at the server. I have seen this in testing. When it happens, the | |
| 46 // test server will send one of the clients a response to upate its local ID so | |
| 47 // that both clients will refer to the item using the same ID going forward. In | |
| 48 // this case, we're right to assume that the update is not a reflection. | |
| 49 // | |
| 50 // For more information, see FindLocalIdToUpdate(). | |
| 51 bool UpdateContainsNewVersion(syncable::BaseTransaction *trans, | |
| 52 const sync_pb::SyncEntity &update) { | |
| 53 int64 existing_version = -1; // The server always sends positive versions. | |
| 54 syncable::Entry existing_entry(trans, GET_BY_ID, | |
| 55 SyncableIdFromProto(update.id_string())); | |
| 56 if (existing_entry.good()) | |
| 57 existing_version = existing_entry.Get(syncable::BASE_VERSION); | |
| 58 | |
| 59 if (!existing_entry.good() && update.deleted()) { | |
| 60 // There are several possible explanations for this. The most common cases | |
| 61 // will be first time sync and the redelivery of deletions we've already | |
| 62 // synced, accepted, and purged from our database. In either case, the | |
| 63 // update is useless to us. Let's count them all as "not new", even though | |
| 64 // that may not always be entirely accurate. | |
| 65 return false; | |
| 66 } | |
| 67 | |
| 68 if (existing_entry.good() && | |
| 69 !existing_entry.Get(syncable::UNIQUE_CLIENT_TAG).empty() && | |
| 70 existing_entry.Get(syncable::IS_DEL) && | |
| 71 update.deleted()) { | |
| 72 // Unique client tags will have their version set to zero when they're | |
| 73 // deleted. The usual version comparison logic won't be able to detect | |
| 74 // reflections of these items. Instead, we assume any received tombstones | |
| 75 // are reflections. That should be correct most of the time. | |
| 76 return false; | |
| 77 } | |
| 78 | |
| 79 return existing_version < update.version(); | |
| 80 } | |
| 81 | |
| 82 // In the event that IDs match, but tags differ AttemptReuniteClient tag | |
| 83 // will have refused to unify the update. | |
| 84 // We should not attempt to apply it at all since it violates consistency | |
| 85 // rules. | |
| 86 VerifyResult VerifyTagConsistency(const sync_pb::SyncEntity& entry, | |
| 87 const syncable::MutableEntry& same_id) { | |
| 88 if (entry.has_client_defined_unique_tag() && | |
| 89 entry.client_defined_unique_tag() != | |
| 90 same_id.Get(syncable::UNIQUE_CLIENT_TAG)) { | |
| 91 return VERIFY_FAIL; | |
| 92 } | |
| 93 return VERIFY_UNDECIDED; | |
| 94 } | |
| 95 } // namespace | |
| 96 | |
| 97 VerifyUpdatesCommand::VerifyUpdatesCommand() {} | |
| 98 VerifyUpdatesCommand::~VerifyUpdatesCommand() {} | |
| 99 | |
| 100 std::set<ModelSafeGroup> VerifyUpdatesCommand::GetGroupsToChange( | |
| 101 const sessions::SyncSession& session) const { | |
| 102 std::set<ModelSafeGroup> groups_with_updates; | |
| 103 | |
| 104 const sync_pb::GetUpdatesResponse& updates = | |
| 105 session.status_controller().updates_response().get_updates(); | |
| 106 for (int i = 0; i < updates.entries().size(); i++) { | |
| 107 groups_with_updates.insert( | |
| 108 GetGroupForModelType(GetModelType(updates.entries(i)), | |
| 109 session.routing_info())); | |
| 110 } | |
| 111 | |
| 112 return groups_with_updates; | |
| 113 } | |
| 114 | |
| 115 SyncerError VerifyUpdatesCommand::ModelChangingExecuteImpl( | |
| 116 sessions::SyncSession* session) { | |
| 117 DVLOG(1) << "Beginning Update Verification"; | |
| 118 syncable::Directory* dir = session->context()->directory(); | |
| 119 WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, SYNCER, dir); | |
| 120 sessions::StatusController* status = session->mutable_status_controller(); | |
| 121 const sync_pb::GetUpdatesResponse& updates = | |
| 122 status->updates_response().get_updates(); | |
| 123 int update_count = updates.entries().size(); | |
| 124 | |
| 125 ModelTypeSet requested_types = GetRoutingInfoTypes( | |
| 126 session->routing_info()); | |
| 127 | |
| 128 DVLOG(1) << update_count << " entries to verify"; | |
| 129 for (int i = 0; i < update_count; i++) { | |
| 130 const sync_pb::SyncEntity& update = updates.entries(i); | |
| 131 ModelSafeGroup g = GetGroupForModelType(GetModelType(update), | |
| 132 session->routing_info()); | |
| 133 if (g != status->group_restriction()) | |
| 134 continue; | |
| 135 | |
| 136 VerifyUpdateResult result = VerifyUpdate(&trans, update, | |
| 137 requested_types, | |
| 138 session->routing_info()); | |
| 139 status->mutable_update_progress()->AddVerifyResult(result.value, update); | |
| 140 status->increment_num_updates_downloaded_by(1); | |
| 141 if (!UpdateContainsNewVersion(&trans, update)) | |
| 142 status->increment_num_reflected_updates_downloaded_by(1); | |
| 143 if (update.deleted()) | |
| 144 status->increment_num_tombstone_updates_downloaded_by(1); | |
| 145 } | |
| 146 | |
| 147 return SYNCER_OK; | |
| 148 } | |
| 149 | |
| 150 VerifyUpdatesCommand::VerifyUpdateResult VerifyUpdatesCommand::VerifyUpdate( | |
| 151 syncable::WriteTransaction* trans, const sync_pb::SyncEntity& entry, | |
| 152 ModelTypeSet requested_types, | |
| 153 const ModelSafeRoutingInfo& routes) { | |
| 154 syncable::Id id = SyncableIdFromProto(entry.id_string()); | |
| 155 VerifyUpdateResult result = {VERIFY_FAIL, GROUP_PASSIVE}; | |
| 156 | |
| 157 const bool deleted = entry.has_deleted() && entry.deleted(); | |
| 158 const bool is_directory = IsFolder(entry); | |
| 159 const ModelType model_type = GetModelType(entry); | |
| 160 | |
| 161 if (!id.ServerKnows()) { | |
| 162 LOG(ERROR) << "Illegal negative id in received updates"; | |
| 163 return result; | |
| 164 } | |
| 165 { | |
| 166 const std::string name = SyncerProtoUtil::NameFromSyncEntity(entry); | |
| 167 if (name.empty() && !deleted) { | |
| 168 LOG(ERROR) << "Zero length name in non-deleted update"; | |
| 169 return result; | |
| 170 } | |
| 171 } | |
| 172 | |
| 173 syncable::MutableEntry same_id(trans, GET_BY_ID, id); | |
| 174 result.value = VerifyNewEntry(entry, &same_id, deleted); | |
| 175 | |
| 176 ModelType placement_type = !deleted ? GetModelType(entry) | |
| 177 : same_id.good() ? same_id.GetModelType() : UNSPECIFIED; | |
| 178 result.placement = GetGroupForModelType(placement_type, routes); | |
| 179 | |
| 180 if (VERIFY_UNDECIDED == result.value) { | |
| 181 result.value = VerifyTagConsistency(entry, same_id); | |
| 182 } | |
| 183 | |
| 184 if (VERIFY_UNDECIDED == result.value) { | |
| 185 if (deleted) { | |
| 186 // For deletes the server could send tombostones for items that | |
| 187 // the client did not request. If so ignore those items. | |
| 188 if (IsRealDataType(placement_type) && | |
| 189 !requested_types.Has(placement_type)) { | |
| 190 result.value = VERIFY_SKIP; | |
| 191 } else { | |
| 192 result.value = VERIFY_SUCCESS; | |
| 193 } | |
| 194 } | |
| 195 } | |
| 196 | |
| 197 // If we have an existing entry, we check here for updates that break | |
| 198 // consistency rules. | |
| 199 if (VERIFY_UNDECIDED == result.value) { | |
| 200 result.value = VerifyUpdateConsistency(trans, entry, &same_id, | |
| 201 deleted, is_directory, model_type); | |
| 202 } | |
| 203 | |
| 204 if (VERIFY_UNDECIDED == result.value) | |
| 205 result.value = VERIFY_SUCCESS; // No news is good news. | |
| 206 | |
| 207 return result; // This might be VERIFY_SUCCESS as well | |
| 208 } | |
| 209 | |
| 210 } // namespace syncer | |
| OLD | NEW |