Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(528)

Unified Diff: remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc

Issue 10919259: Fix MessageReader not to invoke message callback from done callback. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 8 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/protocol/message_reader.h ('k') | remoting/protocol/message_reader_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc
diff --git a/remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc b/remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc
index 309f87dd060f577cfdf1dfbe5499d215babf6000..9dbefdfdf8485793dccc235e443ba5c9465d295c 100644
--- a/remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc
+++ b/remoting/protocol/message_reader.cc
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include "base/compiler_specific.h"
#include "base/location.h"
#include "base/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
+#include "base/single_thread_task_runner.h"
#include "net/base/io_buffer.h"
#include "net/base/net_errors.h"
#include "net/socket/socket.h"
@@ -34,13 +35,13 @@ void MessageReader::Init(net::Socket* socket,
message_received_callback_ = callback;
DCHECK(socket);
socket_ = socket;
- DoRead();
+ DoRead(false);
}
MessageReader::~MessageReader() {
}
-void MessageReader::DoRead() {
+void MessageReader::DoRead(bool in_callback) {
DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
// Don't try to read again if there is another read pending or we
// have messages that we haven't finished processing yet.
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ void MessageReader::DoRead() {
int result = socket_->Read(
read_buffer_, kReadBufferSize,
base::Bind(&MessageReader::OnRead, weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
- HandleReadResult(result);
+ HandleReadResult(result, in_callback);
}
}
@@ -59,18 +60,18 @@ void MessageReader::OnRead(int result) {
read_pending_ = false;
if (!closed_) {
- HandleReadResult(result);
- DoRead();
+ HandleReadResult(result, false);
+ DoRead(false);
}
}
-void MessageReader::HandleReadResult(int result) {
+void MessageReader::HandleReadResult(int result, bool in_callback) {
DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
if (closed_)
return;
if (result > 0) {
- OnDataReceived(read_buffer_, result);
+ OnDataReceived(read_buffer_, result, in_callback);
} else if (result == net::ERR_IO_PENDING) {
read_pending_ = true;
} else {
@@ -82,7 +83,8 @@ void MessageReader::HandleReadResult(int result) {
}
}
-void MessageReader::OnDataReceived(net::IOBuffer* data, int data_size) {
+void MessageReader::OnDataReceived(net::IOBuffer* data, int data_size,
+ bool in_callback) {
DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
message_decoder_.AddData(data, data_size);
@@ -100,20 +102,32 @@ void MessageReader::OnDataReceived(net::IOBuffer* data, int data_size) {
for (std::vector<CompoundBuffer*>::iterator it = new_messages.begin();
it != new_messages.end(); ++it) {
- message_received_callback_.Run(
- scoped_ptr<CompoundBuffer>(*it),
- base::Bind(&MessageReader::OnMessageDone,
- weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
+ scoped_ptr<CompoundBuffer> message(*it);
+ if (in_callback) {
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(
+ FROM_HERE, base::Bind(&MessageReader::RunCallback,
+ weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ base::Passed(&message)));
+ } else {
+ RunCallback(message.Pass());
+ }
}
}
+void MessageReader::RunCallback(scoped_ptr<CompoundBuffer> message) {
+ message_received_callback_.Run(
+ message.Pass(), base::Bind(&MessageReader::OnMessageDone,
+ weak_factory_.GetWeakPtr()));
+}
+
void MessageReader::OnMessageDone() {
DCHECK(CalledOnValidThread());
pending_messages_--;
DCHECK_GE(pending_messages_, 0);
+ // Start next read if necessary.
if (!read_pending_)
Wez 2012/09/13 01:00:09 nit: DoRead() already checks |read_pending_| so yo
Sergey Ulanov 2012/09/13 01:40:21 Done.
- DoRead(); // Start next read if necessary.
+ DoRead(true);
Wez 2012/09/13 01:00:09 Wouldn't it be simpler to have a member that you s
Sergey Ulanov 2012/09/13 01:40:21 I actually noticed another bug in this code - it d
}
} // namespace protocol
« no previous file with comments | « remoting/protocol/message_reader.h ('k') | remoting/protocol/message_reader_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698