corelib/src/hashable.dart - Issue 10832401: Gentle start with removing explicit interfaces

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: corelib/src/hashable.dart

Issue 10832401: Gentle start with removing explicit interfaces (Closed) Base URL: http://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart/

Patch Set: Created 8 years, 4 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

OLD	NEW
1 // Copyright (c) 2011, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file	1 // Copyright (c) 2011, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file

2 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a	2 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a

3 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.	3 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

4	4

5 // Dart core library.	5 // Dart core library.

6	6

7 interface Hashable {	7 abstract class Hashable {

8 int hashCode();	8 abstract int hashCode();
	sra1 2012/08/21 18:31:39 I believe this 'abstract' is optional. It would ce I believe this 'abstract' is optional. It would certainly look less cluttered without it. hausner 2012/08/23 00:25:06 It is, but 1) The VM does not implement this yet Show quoted text On 2012/08/21 18:31:39, sra1 wrote: > I believe this 'abstract' is optional. > It would certainly look less cluttered without it. It is, but 1) The VM does not implement this yet. 2) It's nicer to explicitly mark abstract functions.
9 }	9 }

OLD	NEW