sync: Introduce control data types

sync/engine/apply_updates_command_unittest.cc

 // Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 #include <string>
 
-#include "base/format_macros.h"
 #include "base/location.h"
 #include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
 #include "base/stringprintf.h"
 #include "sync/engine/apply_updates_command.h"
 #include "sync/engine/syncer.h"
 #include "sync/internal_api/public/test/test_entry_factory.h"
 #include "sync/protocol/bookmark_specifics.pb.h"
 #include "sync/protocol/password_specifics.pb.h"
-#include "sync/sessions/sync_session.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/mutable_entry.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/nigori_util.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/read_transaction.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/syncable_id.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/syncable_util.h"
 #include "sync/syncable/write_transaction.h"
 #include "sync/test/engine/fake_model_worker.h"
 #include "sync/test/engine/syncer_command_test.h"
 #include "sync/test/engine/test_id_factory.h"
 #include "sync/test/fake_encryptor.h"
 #include "sync/test/fake_sync_encryption_handler.h"
 #include "sync/util/cryptographer.h"
 #include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
 
 namespace syncer {
 
-using sessions::SyncSession;
 using std::string;
 using syncable::Id;
 using syncable::MutableEntry;
 using syncable::UNITTEST;
 using syncable::WriteTransaction;
 
 namespace {
 sync_pb::EntitySpecifics DefaultBookmarkSpecifics() {
   sync_pb::EntitySpecifics result;
   AddDefaultFieldValue(BOOKMARKS, &result);
@@ skipping 10 matching lines @@
 
   virtual void SetUp() {
     workers()->clear();
     mutable_routing_info()->clear();
     workers()->push_back(
         make_scoped_refptr(new FakeModelWorker(GROUP_UI)));
     workers()->push_back(
         make_scoped_refptr(new FakeModelWorker(GROUP_PASSWORD)));
     (*mutable_routing_info())[BOOKMARKS] = GROUP_UI;
     (*mutable_routing_info())[PASSWORDS] = GROUP_PASSWORD;
-    (*mutable_routing_info())[NIGORI] = GROUP_PASSIVE;
+    (*mutable_routing_info())[NIGORI] = GROUP_CONTROL;
     SyncerCommandTest::SetUp();
     entry_factory_.reset(new TestEntryFactory(directory()));
     ExpectNoGroupsToChange(apply_updates_command_);
 
     syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
     directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans)->SetNigoriHandler(
         &fake_encryption_handler_);
     fake_encryption_handler_.set_cryptographer(
         directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans));
   }
 
  protected:
   DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest);
 
   ApplyUpdatesCommand apply_updates_command_;
   FakeEncryptor encryptor_;
-  TestIdFactory id_factory_;
   scoped_ptr<TestEntryFactory> entry_factory_;
   FakeSyncEncryptionHandler fake_encryption_handler_;
 };
 
 TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, Simple) {
   string root_server_id = syncable::GetNullId().GetServerId();
   entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("parent",
                                                    DefaultBookmarkSpecifics(),
                                                    root_server_id);
   entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent("child",
@@ skipping 77 matching lines @@
   int64 handle = entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedAndUnsyncedItem(
       "orphaned_by_server", BOOKMARKS);
   {
     // Manually set the SERVER_PARENT_ID to bad value.
     // A bad parent indicates a hierarchy conflict.
     WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
     MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_HANDLE, handle);
     ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
 
     entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID,
-              id_factory_.MakeServer("bogus_parent"));
+              TestIdFactory::MakeServer("bogus_parent"));
   }
 
   ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_UI);
   apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
 
   sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
   sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
 
   EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize());
 
@@ skipping 16 matching lines @@
     // Create it as a child of root node.
     int64 handle = entry_factory_->CreateSyncedItem("X", BOOKMARKS, true);
 
     WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
     MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_HANDLE, handle);
     ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
 
     // Re-parent from root to "Y"
     entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_VERSION, entry_factory_->GetNextRevision());
     entry.Put(syncable::IS_UNAPPLIED_UPDATE, true);
-    entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID, id_factory_.MakeServer("Y"));
+    entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID, TestIdFactory::MakeServer("Y"));
   }
 
   // Item 'Y' is child of 'X'.
   entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-      id_factory_.MakeServer("Y"), id_factory_.MakeServer("X"), "Y", true,
+      TestIdFactory::MakeServer("Y"), TestIdFactory::MakeServer("X"), "Y", true,
       BOOKMARKS, NULL);
 
   // If the server's update were applied, we would have X be a child of Y, and Y
   // as a child of X.  That's a directory loop.  The UpdateApplicator should
   // prevent the update from being applied and note that this is a hierarchy
   // conflict.
 
   ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_UI);
   apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
 
   sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
   sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
 
   EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize());
 
   // This should count as a hierarchy conflict.
   ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
   EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress()->HierarchyConflictingItemsSize());
   EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize());
 }
 
 // Runs the ApplyUpdatesCommand on a directory where the server sent us an
 // update to add a child to a locally deleted (and unsynced) parent.  We expect
 // the command to not apply the update and to indicate the update is in a
 // CONFLICT_HIERARCHY state.
 TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, HierarchyConflictDeletedParent) {
   // Create a locally deleted parent item.
   int64 parent_handle;
   entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-      Id::CreateFromServerId("parent"), id_factory_.root(),
+      Id::CreateFromServerId("parent"), TestIdFactory::root(),
       "parent", true, BOOKMARKS, &parent_handle);
   {
     WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
     MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_HANDLE, parent_handle);
     entry.Put(syncable::IS_DEL, true);
   }
 
   // Create an incoming child from the server.
   entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItemWithParent(
       "child", DefaultBookmarkSpecifics(), "parent");
@@ skipping 25 matching lines @@
     int64 handle =
         entry_factory_->CreateSyncedItem("parent", BOOKMARKS, true);
 
     WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
     MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_HANDLE, handle);
     ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
 
     // Delete it on the server.
     entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_VERSION, entry_factory_->GetNextRevision());
     entry.Put(syncable::IS_UNAPPLIED_UPDATE, true);
-    entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID, id_factory_.root());
+    entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_PARENT_ID, TestIdFactory::root());
     entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_IS_DEL, true);
   }
 
   // Create a local child of the server-deleted directory.
   entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-      id_factory_.MakeServer("child"), id_factory_.MakeServer("parent"),
+      TestIdFactory::MakeServer("child"), TestIdFactory::MakeServer("parent"),
       "child", false, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
 
   // The server's request to delete the directory must be ignored, otherwise our
   // unsynced new child would be orphaned.  This is a hierarchy conflict.
 
   ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_UI);
   apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
 
   sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
   sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_UI);
@@ skipping 201 matching lines @@
         << "The updates that can't be decrypted should not be in regular "
         << "conflict";
     EXPECT_EQ(1, status->conflict_progress()->EncryptionConflictingItemsSize())
         << "The updates that can't be decrypted should be in encryption "
         << "conflict";
     EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
         << "The undecryptable password update shouldn't be applied";
   }
 }
 
-TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NigoriUpdate) {
-  // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
-  // know it's safe.
-  Cryptographer* cryptographer;
-  ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
-  encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
-  encrypted_types.Put(NIGORI);
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(encrypted_types));
-  }
-
-  // Nigori node updates should update the Cryptographer.
-  Cryptographer other_cryptographer(&encryptor_);
-  KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
-  other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
-
-  sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
-  sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
-  other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
-  nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
-      ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-
-  ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
-
-  sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
-  sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
-      << "All updates should have been attempted";
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize())
-      << "The nigori update shouldn't be in conflict";
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
-      << "The nigori update should be applied";
-
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
-}
-
-TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, NigoriUpdateForDisabledTypes) {
-  // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
-  // know it's safe.
-  Cryptographer* cryptographer;
-  ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
-  encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
-  encrypted_types.Put(NIGORI);
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(encrypted_types));
-  }
-
-  // Nigori node updates should update the Cryptographer.
-  Cryptographer other_cryptographer(&encryptor_);
-  KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
-  other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
-
-  sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
-  sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
-  other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
-  nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
-      ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-
-  ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
-
-  sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
-  sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
-      << "All updates should have been attempted";
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize())
-      << "The nigori update shouldn't be in conflict";
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
-      << "The nigori update should be applied";
-
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(ModelTypeSet::All()));
-}
-
-// Create some local unsynced and unencrypted data. Apply a nigori update that
-// turns on encryption for the unsynced data. Ensure we properly encrypt the
-// data as part of the nigori update. Apply another nigori update with no
-// changes. Ensure we ignore already-encrypted unsynced data and that nothing
-// breaks.
-TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, EncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
-  // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
-  // know it's safe.
-  Cryptographer* cryptographer;
-  ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
-  encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
-  encrypted_types.Put(NIGORI);
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(encrypted_types));
-
-    // With default encrypted_types, this should be true.
-    EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(handles.empty());
-  }
-
-  // Create unsynced bookmarks without encryption.
-  // First item is a folder
-  Id folder_id = id_factory_.NewLocalId();
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(folder_id, id_factory_.root(), "folder",
-                                     true, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  // Next five items are children of the folder
-  size_t i;
-  size_t batch_s = 5;
-  for (i = 0; i < batch_s; ++i) {
-    entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(id_factory_.NewLocalId(), folder_id,
-                                       base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i),
-                                       false, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  }
-  // Next five items are children of the root.
-  for (; i < 2*batch_s; ++i) {
-    entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-        id_factory_.NewLocalId(), id_factory_.root(),
-        base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i), false,
-        BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  }
-
-  KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
-  cryptographer->AddKey(params);
-  sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
-  sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
-  cryptographer->GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
-  nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
-  encrypted_types.Put(BOOKMARKS);
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
-      ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-
-  {
-    // Ensure we have unsynced nodes that aren't properly encrypted.
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
-  }
-
-  ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
-
-  {
-    sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
-    sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-    ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
-    EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
-        << "All updates should have been attempted";
-    ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
-    EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize())
-        << "No updates should be in conflict";
-    EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->EncryptionConflictingItemsSize())
-        << "No updates should be in conflict";
-    EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
-        << "The nigori update should be applied";
-  }
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-
-    // If ProcessUnsyncedChangesForEncryption worked, all our unsynced changes
-    // should be encrypted now.
-    EXPECT_TRUE(ModelTypeSet::All().Equals(
-        cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes()));
-    EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
-  }
-
-  // Simulate another nigori update that doesn't change anything.
-  {
-    WriteTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, UNITTEST, directory());
-    MutableEntry entry(&trans, syncable::GET_BY_SERVER_TAG,
-                       ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI));
-    ASSERT_TRUE(entry.good());
-    entry.Put(syncable::SERVER_VERSION, entry_factory_->GetNextRevision());
-    entry.Put(syncable::IS_UNAPPLIED_UPDATE, true);
-  }
-  ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
-  {
-    sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
-    sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-    ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
-        << "All updates should have been attempted";
-    ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
-    EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize())
-        << "No updates should be in conflict";
-    EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->EncryptionConflictingItemsSize())
-        << "No updates should be in conflict";
-    EXPECT_EQ(2, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
-        << "The nigori update should be applied";
-  }
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-
-    // All our changes should still be encrypted.
-    EXPECT_TRUE(ModelTypeSet::All().Equals(
-        cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes()));
-    EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
-  }
-}
-
-TEST_F(ApplyUpdatesCommandTest, CannotEncryptUnsyncedChanges) {
-  // Storing the cryptographer separately is bad, but for this test we
-  // know it's safe.
-  Cryptographer* cryptographer;
-  ModelTypeSet encrypted_types;
-  encrypted_types.Put(PASSWORDS);
-  encrypted_types.Put(NIGORI);
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    cryptographer = directory()->GetCryptographer(&trans);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(encrypted_types));
-
-    // With default encrypted_types, this should be true.
-    EXPECT_TRUE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_TRUE(handles.empty());
-  }
-
-  // Create unsynced bookmarks without encryption.
-  // First item is a folder
-  Id folder_id = id_factory_.NewLocalId();
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-      folder_id, id_factory_.root(), "folder", true,
-      BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  // Next five items are children of the folder
-  size_t i;
-  size_t batch_s = 5;
-  for (i = 0; i < batch_s; ++i) {
-    entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(id_factory_.NewLocalId(), folder_id,
-                                       base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i),
-                                       false, BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  }
-  // Next five items are children of the root.
-  for (; i < 2*batch_s; ++i) {
-    entry_factory_->CreateUnsyncedItem(
-        id_factory_.NewLocalId(), id_factory_.root(),
-        base::StringPrintf("Item %"PRIuS"", i), false,
-        BOOKMARKS, NULL);
-  }
-
-  // We encrypt with new keys, triggering the local cryptographer to be unready
-  // and unable to decrypt data (once updated).
-  Cryptographer other_cryptographer(&encryptor_);
-  KeyParams params = {"localhost", "dummy", "foobar"};
-  other_cryptographer.AddKey(params);
-  sync_pb::EntitySpecifics specifics;
-  sync_pb::NigoriSpecifics* nigori = specifics.mutable_nigori();
-  other_cryptographer.GetKeys(nigori->mutable_encrypted());
-  nigori->set_encrypt_everything(true);
-  encrypted_types.Put(BOOKMARKS);
-  entry_factory_->CreateUnappliedNewItem(
-      ModelTypeToRootTag(NIGORI), specifics, true);
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-
-  {
-    // Ensure we have unsynced nodes that aren't properly encrypted.
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-    EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
-  }
-
-  ExpectGroupToChange(apply_updates_command_, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  apply_updates_command_.ExecuteImpl(session());
-
-  sessions::StatusController* status = session()->mutable_status_controller();
-  sessions::ScopedModelSafeGroupRestriction r(status, GROUP_PASSIVE);
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->update_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->AppliedUpdatesSize())
-      << "All updates should have been attempted";
-  ASSERT_TRUE(status->conflict_progress());
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->SimpleConflictingItemsSize())
-      << "The unsynced changes don't trigger a blocking conflict with the "
-      << "nigori update.";
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, status->conflict_progress()->EncryptionConflictingItemsSize())
-      << "The unsynced changes don't trigger an encryption conflict with the "
-      << "nigori update.";
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, status->update_progress()->SuccessfullyAppliedUpdateCount())
-      << "The nigori update should be applied";
-  EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-  EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-  {
-    syncable::ReadTransaction trans(FROM_HERE, directory());
-
-    // Since we have pending keys, we would have failed to encrypt, but the
-    // cryptographer should be updated.
-    EXPECT_FALSE(VerifyUnsyncedChangesAreEncrypted(&trans, encrypted_types));
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->GetEncryptedTypes().Equals(
-        ModelTypeSet().All()));
-    EXPECT_FALSE(cryptographer->is_ready());
-    EXPECT_TRUE(cryptographer->has_pending_keys());
-
-    Syncer::UnsyncedMetaHandles handles;
-    GetUnsyncedEntries(&trans, &handles);
-    EXPECT_EQ(2*batch_s+1, handles.size());
-  }
-}
-
 }  // namespace syncer