| Index: chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html
|
| diff --git a/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html
|
| new file mode 100644
|
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee26ea062650afbed1961bef5d04f12dee408998
|
| --- /dev/null
|
| +++ b/chrome/common/extensions/docs/server2/templates/articles/sandboxingEval.html
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
|
| +<h1>Using eval in Chrome Extensions. Safely.</h1>
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + Chrome's extension system enforces a fairly strict default
|
| + <a href='contentSecurityPolicy.html'>
|
| + <strong>Content Security Policy (CSP)</strong>
|
| + </a>. The policy restrictions are straightforward: script must be moved
|
| + out-of-line into separate JavaScript files, inline event handlers must be
|
| + converted to use <code>addEventListener</code>, and <code>eval()</code> is
|
| + disabled. Chrome Apps have an
|
| + <a href='http://developer.chrome.com/trunk/apps/app_csp.html'>even more strict
|
| + policy</a>, and we're quite happy with the security properties these policies
|
| + provide.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + We recognize, however, that a variety of libraries use <code>eval()</code> and
|
| + <code>eval</code>-like constructs such as <code>new Function()</code> for
|
| + performance optimization and ease of expression. Templating libraries are
|
| + especially prone to this style of implementation. While some (like
|
| + <a href='http://angularjs.org/'>Angular.js</a>) support CSP out of the box,
|
| + many popular frameworks haven't yet updated to a mechanism that is compatible
|
| + with extensions' <code>eval</code>-less world. Removing support for that
|
| + functionality has therefore proven <a href='http://crbug.com/107538'>more
|
| + problematic than expected</a> for developers.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + This document introduces sandboxing as a safe mechanism to include these
|
| + libraries in your projects without compromising on security. For brevity,
|
| + we'll be using the term <em>extensions</em> throughout, but the concept
|
| + applies equally to applications.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<h2>Why sandbox?</h2>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + <code>eval</code> is dangerous inside an extension because the code it
|
| + executes has access to everything in the extension's high-permission
|
| + environment. A slew of powerful <code>chrome.*</code> APIs are available that
|
| + could severely impact a user's security and privacy; simple data exfiltration
|
| + is the least of our worries. The solution on offer is a sandbox in which
|
| + <code>eval</code> can execute code without access either to the extension's
|
| + data or the extension's high-value APIs. No data, no APIs, no problem.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + We accomplish this by listing specific HTML files inside the extension package
|
| + as being sandboxed. Whenever a sandboxed page is loaded, it will be moved to a
|
| + <a href='http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/origin-0.html#sandboxed-origin-browsing-context-flag'>unique origin</a>,
|
| + and will be denied access to <code>chrome.*</code> APIs. If we load this
|
| + sandboxed page into our extension via an <code>iframe</code>, we can pass it
|
| + messages, let it act upon those messages in some way, and wait for it to pass
|
| + us back a result. This simple messaging mechanism gives us everything we need
|
| + to safely include <code>eval</code>-driven code in our extension's workflow.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<h2>Creating and using a sandbox.</h2>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + If you'd like to dive straight into code, please grab the
|
| + <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/samples.html#3c6dfba67f6a7480d931b5a4a646c151ad1a049b'>sandboxing
|
| + sample extension and take off</a>. It's a working example of a tiny messaging
|
| + API built on top of the <a href='http://handlebarsjs.com'>Handlebars</a>
|
| + templating library, and it should give you everything you need to get going.
|
| + For those of you who'd like a little more explanation, let's walk through that
|
| + sample together here.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<h3>List files in manifest</h3>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + Each file that ought to be run inside a sandbox must be listed in the
|
| + extension manifest by adding a <code>sandbox</code> property. This is a
|
| + critical step, and it's easy to forget, so please double check that your
|
| + sandboxed file is listed in the manifest. In this sample, we're sandboxing the
|
| + file cleverly named "sandbox.html". The manifest entry looks like this:
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<pre>{
|
| + ...,
|
| + "sandbox": {
|
| + "pages": ["sandbox.html"]
|
| + },
|
| + ...
|
| +}</pre>
|
| +
|
| +<h3>Load the sandboxed file</h3>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + In order to do something interesting with the sandboxed file, we need to load
|
| + it in a context where it can be addressed by the extension's code. Here,
|
| + <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/sandbox.html'>sandbox.html</a>
|
| + has been loaded into the extension's <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/dev/event_pages.html'>Event
|
| + Page</a> (<a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/eventpage.html'>eventpage.html</a>)
|
| + via an <code>iframe</code>. <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/examples/howto/sandbox/eventpage.js'>eventpage.js</a>
|
| + contains code that sends a message into the sandbox whenever the browser
|
| + action is clicked by finding the <code>iframe</code> on the page, and
|
| + executing the <code>postMessage</code> method on its
|
| + <code>contentWindow</code>. The message is an object containing two
|
| + properties: <code>context</code> and <code>command</code>. We'll dive into
|
| + both in a moment.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<pre>chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function() {
|
| + var iframe = document.getElementById('theFrame');
|
| + var message = {
|
| + command: 'render',
|
| + context: {thing: 'world'}
|
| + };
|
| + iframe.contentWindow.postMessage(message, '*');
|
| +});</pre>
|
| +
|
| +<p class="note">
|
| + For general information about the <code>postMessage</code> API, take a look at
|
| + the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.postMessage">
|
| + <code>postMessage</code> documentation on MDN
|
| + </a>. It's quite complete and worth reading. In particular, note that data can
|
| + only be passed back and forth if it's serializable. Functions, for instance,
|
| + are not.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<h3>Do something dangerous</h3>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + When <code>sandbox.html</code> is loaded, it loads the Handlebars library, and
|
| + creates and compiles an inline template in the way Handlebars suggests:
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<pre><script src="handlebars-1.0.0.beta.6.js"></script>
|
| + <script id="hello-world-template" type="text/x-handlebars-template">
|
| + <div class="entry">
|
| + <h1>Hello, {{thing}}!</h1>
|
| + </div>
|
| + </script>
|
| + <script>
|
| + var templates = [];
|
| + var source = document.getElementById('hello-world-template').innerHTML;
|
| + templates['hello'] = Handlebars.compile(source);
|
| + </script></pre>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + This doesn't fail! Even though <code>Handlebars.compile</code> ends up using
|
| + <code>new Function</code>, things work exactly as expected, and we end up with
|
| + a compiled template in <code>templates[‘hello']</code>.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<h3>Pass the result back</h3>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + We'll make this template available for use by setting up a message listener
|
| + that accepts commands from the Event Page. We'll use the <code>command</code>
|
| + passed in to determine what ought to be done (you could imagine doing more
|
| + than simply rendering; perhaps creating templates? Perhaps managing them in
|
| + some way?), and the <code>context</code> will be passed into the template
|
| + directly for rendering. The rendered HTML will be passed back to the Event
|
| + Page so the extension can do something useful with it later on:
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<pre>window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {
|
| + var command = event.data.command;
|
| + var name = event.data.name || 'hello';
|
| + switch(command) {
|
| + case 'render':
|
| + event.source.postMessage({
|
| + name: name,
|
| + html: templates[name](event.data.context)
|
| + }, event.origin);
|
| + break;
|
| +
|
| + // case 'somethingElse':
|
| + // ...
|
| + }
|
| +});</pre>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + Back in the Event Page, we'll receive this message, and do something
|
| + interesting with the <code>html</code> data we've been passed. In this case,
|
| + we'll just echo it out via a <a href='http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/notifications.html'>Desktop
|
| + Notification</a>, but it's entirely possible to use this HTML safely as part
|
| + of the extension's UI. Inserting it via <code>innerHTML</code> doesn't pose a
|
| + significant security risk, as even a complete compromise of the sandboxed code
|
| + through some clever attack would be unable to inject dangerous script or
|
| + plugin content into the high-permission extension context.
|
| +</p>
|
| +
|
| +<p>
|
| + This mechanism makes templating straightforward, but it of course isn't
|
| + limited to templating. Any code that doesn't work out of the box under a
|
| + strict Content Security Policy can be sandboxed; in fact, it's often useful
|
| + to sandbox components of your extensions that <em>would</em> run correctly in
|
| + order to restrict each piece of your program to the smallest set of privileges
|
| + necessary for it to properly execute. The
|
| + <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBxv8SaX0gg">Writing Secure Web Apps
|
| + and Chrome Extensions</a> presentation from Google I/O 2012 gives some good
|
| + examples of these technique in action, and is worth 56 minutes of your time.
|
| +</p>
|
|
|