Index: remoting/host/win/launch_process_with_token.cc |
diff --git a/remoting/host/win/launch_process_with_token.cc b/remoting/host/win/launch_process_with_token.cc |
index 0dfbb4d2dd63006d9ad1efe9eb7f4f2c17d4dce8..7b9ab2afc1a8f2c70a049a7ca62a419dc8f50b3f 100644 |
--- a/remoting/host/win/launch_process_with_token.cc |
+++ b/remoting/host/win/launch_process_with_token.cc |
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ |
#include "base/scoped_native_library.h" |
#include "base/stringprintf.h" |
#include "base/utf_string_conversions.h" |
-#include "base/win/scoped_handle.h" |
#include "base/win/scoped_process_information.h" |
#include "base/win/windows_version.h" |
@@ -40,6 +39,63 @@ const int kMinLaunchDelaySeconds = 1; |
// Name of the default session desktop. |
wchar_t kDefaultDesktopName[] = L"winsta0\\default"; |
+// Takes the process token and makes a copy of it. The returned handle will have |
+// |desired_access| rights. |
Wez
2012/08/03 20:56:06
nit: Clarify that we make an impersonation token f
alexeypa (please no reviews)
2012/08/03 21:40:39
Done.
|
+bool CopyProcessToken(DWORD desired_access, ScopedHandle* token_out) { |
+ HANDLE handle; |
Wez
2012/08/03 20:56:06
Why not use ScopedHandle::Receive() to avoid the u
alexeypa (please no reviews)
2012/08/03 21:40:39
Good point. I missed this piece.
|
+ if (!OpenProcessToken(GetCurrentProcess(), |
+ TOKEN_DUPLICATE | desired_access, |
+ &handle)) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << "Failed to open process token"; |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ ScopedHandle process_token(handle); |
+ |
+ if (!DuplicateTokenEx(process_token, |
+ desired_access, |
+ NULL, |
+ SecurityImpersonation, |
+ TokenPrimary, |
+ &handle)) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << "Failed to duplicate the process token"; |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ token_out->Set(handle); |
+ return true; |
+} |
+ |
+// Creates a copy of the current process with SE_TCB_NAME privilege enabled. |
+bool CreatePrivilegedToken(ScopedHandle* token_out) { |
Wez
2012/08/03 20:56:06
nit: Why not have CreatePrivilegedToken() accept t
alexeypa (please no reviews)
2012/08/03 21:40:39
The main reason is that it is not going to be used
|
+ ScopedHandle privileged_token; |
+ DWORD desired_access = TOKEN_ADJUST_PRIVILEGES | TOKEN_IMPERSONATE | |
+ TOKEN_DUPLICATE | TOKEN_QUERY; |
+ if (!CopyProcessToken(desired_access, &privileged_token)) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // Get the LUID for the SE_TCB_NAME privilege. |
+ TOKEN_PRIVILEGES state; |
+ state.PrivilegeCount = 1; |
+ state.Privileges[0].Attributes = SE_PRIVILEGE_ENABLED; |
+ if (!LookupPrivilegeValue(NULL, SE_TCB_NAME, &state.Privileges[0].Luid)) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << |
+ "Failed to lookup the LUID for the SE_TCB_NAME privilege"; |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // Enable the SE_TCB_NAME privilege. |
+ if (!AdjustTokenPrivileges(privileged_token, FALSE, &state, 0, NULL, 0)) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << |
+ "Failed to enable SE_TCB_NAME privilege in a token"; |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ token_out->Set(privileged_token.Take()); |
+ return true; |
+} |
+ |
// Requests the execution server to create a process in the specified session |
// using the default (i.e. Winlogon) token. This routine relies on undocumented |
// OS functionality and will likely not work on anything but XP or W2K3. |
@@ -243,6 +299,48 @@ bool CreateRemoteSessionProcess( |
namespace remoting { |
+// Creates a copy of the current process token for the given |session_id| so |
+// it can be used to launch a process in that session. |
+bool CreateSessionToken(uint32 session_id, ScopedHandle* token_out) { |
+ ScopedHandle session_token; |
+ DWORD desired_access = TOKEN_ADJUST_DEFAULT | TOKEN_ADJUST_SESSIONID | |
+ TOKEN_ASSIGN_PRIMARY | TOKEN_DUPLICATE | TOKEN_QUERY; |
+ if (!CopyProcessToken(desired_access, &session_token)) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // Temporarily enable the SE_TCB_NAME privilege. |
Wez
2012/08/03 20:56:06
nit: Update comment to indicate _why_ we're doing
alexeypa (please no reviews)
2012/08/03 21:40:39
Done.
|
+ ScopedHandle privileged_token; |
+ if (!CreatePrivilegedToken(&privileged_token)) { |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
Wez
2012/08/03 20:56:06
nit: Lose the blank line; it implies that the impe
alexeypa (please no reviews)
2012/08/03 21:40:39
Done.
|
+ if (!ImpersonateLoggedOnUser(privileged_token)) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << |
+ "Failed to impersonate the privileged token"; |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // Change the session ID of the token. |
+ DWORD new_session_id = session_id; |
+ if (!SetTokenInformation(session_token, |
+ TokenSessionId, |
+ &new_session_id, |
+ sizeof(new_session_id))) { |
+ LOG_GETLASTERROR(ERROR) << "Failed to change session ID of a token"; |
+ |
+ // Revert to the default token. |
+ CHECK(RevertToSelf()); |
+ return false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ // Revert to the default token. |
+ CHECK(RevertToSelf()); |
+ |
+ token_out->Set(session_token.Take()); |
+ return true; |
+} |
+ |
bool LaunchProcessWithToken(const FilePath& binary, |
const std::wstring& command_line, |
HANDLE user_token, |