Index: ui/base/gestures/gesture_sequence.cc |
diff --git a/ui/base/gestures/gesture_sequence.cc b/ui/base/gestures/gesture_sequence.cc |
index 9892fdce2451038d0c28c843777b5bf695fdaac9..c766e76dbb88bdfcf4a445b81e90f7ed5daff09b 100644 |
--- a/ui/base/gestures/gesture_sequence.cc |
+++ b/ui/base/gestures/gesture_sequence.cc |
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ GestureSequence::Gestures* GestureSequence::ProcessTouchEventForGesture( |
// We shouldn't be able to get two PRESSED events from the same |
// finger without either a RELEASE or CANCEL in between. |
DCHECK(!points_[event.GetTouchId()].in_use()); |
+ DCHECK(!new_point->in_use()); |
sadrul
2012/07/05 17:00:54
lines 238/239 are checking the same thing?
girard
2012/07/05 18:43:44
Yes. Since the rest of the code uses the new_poin
sadrul
2012/07/09 07:12:06
Ah, in that case, remove line 238?
girard
2012/07/26 12:36:43
Done.
|
new_point->set_point_id(point_count_++); |
new_point->set_touch_id(event.GetTouchId()); |
} |