Add presubmit script to verify that scaled resources are correct dimensions.

ui/resources/resource_check/resource_scale_factors.py

Index: ui/resources/resource_check/resource_scale_factors.py
diff --git a/ui/resources/resource_check/resource_scale_factors.py b/ui/resources/resource_check/resource_scale_factors.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..61fc2f0147a2bf9f4c380fcb7073f041e63c6338
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ui/resources/resource_check/resource_scale_factors.py
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+# found in the LICENSE file.
+
+"""Presubmit script for Chromium browser resources.
+
+See http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/depottools/presubmit-scripts
+for more details about the presubmit API built into gcl/git cl, and see
+http://www.chromium.org/developers/web-development-style-guide for the rules
+we're checking against here.
+"""
+
+
+import os
+
+
+class ResourceScaleFactors(object):
+  """Verifier of image dimensions for Chromium resources.
+
+  This class verifies the image dimensions of resources in the various
+  resource subdirectories.
+
+  Attributes:
+      paths: An array of arrays giving the folders to check and their
+          relevant scale factors. For example:
+
+          [[1, 'default_100_percent'], [2, 'default_200_percent']]

[benrg, 2012/07/19 21:47:56]

Nit: I'd prefer tuples: [(1, '...'), ...].

You could extract the scale factor from the context name instead (the context is
guaranteed to have the form *_###_percent). You could even drop this parameter
entirely in favor of os.listdir. I can't decide whether this would actually be
an improvement.

[flackr, 2012/07/20 13:53:34]

Done.
Yes I wasn't sure if we were always going to follow the _###_percent or not.
There's certainly a question of how much or little magic to put into this check,
and I'll gladly iterate on this.

[benrg, 2012/07/20 19:51:24]

Grit (currently) requires the _###_percent suffix. Of course, if you extract the
scale from there, you have to deal with non-integer scale factors in this CL.
Unless you want to hack on it more, I think it's fine as is.

+  """
+
+  def __init__(self, input_api, output_api, paths):
+    """ Initializes ResourceScaleFactors with paths."""
+    self.input_api = input_api
+    self.output_api = output_api
+    self.paths = paths
+
+  def RunChecks(self):
+    """Verifies the scale factors of resources being added or modified.
+
+    Returns:
+        An array of presubmit errors if any images were detected not
+        having the correct dimensions.
+    """
+    from PIL import Image
+    def ExpectedSize(base_width, base_height, scale):
+      return round(base_width * scale), round(base_height * scale)

[benrg, 2012/07/19 21:47:56]

This doesn't need to be fixed right now, but when the scale factor isn't exactly
representable as a float this code rounds three times -- first in the scale
itself, then the multiplication, then round(). I think it would be better to use
integer math.

Also, is an exact mathematical round(base*scale) the correct answer? At 100%,
three images of 4px each and four images of 3px each have the same total size,
but at 140% with this formula they don't. Should we check only that the size is
between floor(base*scale) and ceil(base*scale)?

[flackr, 2012/07/20 13:53:34]

Yes, I fully expected this to change when we get non-integer scale factors.
Probably something like between the floor and ceil makes sense but I think it's
worth giving more thought later when we want to start to support that. I'll
leave a comment to that effect.

[benrg, 2012/07/20 19:51:24]

Sounds good.

+
+    repository_path = self.input_api.os_path.relpath(
+        self.input_api.PresubmitLocalPath(),
+        self.input_api.change.RepositoryRoot())
+    results = []
+
+    # Check for affected files in any of the paths specified.
+    affected_files = self.input_api.AffectedFiles(include_deletes=False)
+    files = []
+    for f in affected_files:
+      for path_spec in self.paths:
+        path_root = self.input_api.os_path.join(
+            repository_path, path_spec[1])
+        if (f.LocalPath().endswith('.png') and
+            f.LocalPath().startswith(path_root)):
+          # Only save the relative path from the resource directory.
+          relative_path = self.input_api.os_path.relpath(f.LocalPath(),
+              path_root)
+          if relative_path not in files:
+            files.append(relative_path)
+
+    for f in files:
+      base_image = self.input_api.os_path.join(self.paths[0][1], f)
+      if not os.path.exists(base_image):
+        results.append(self.output_api.PresubmitError(
+            'Base image %s does not exist' % self.input_api.os_path.join(
+            repository_path, base_image)))
+        continue
+      base_width, base_height = Image.open(open(base_image)).size
+      # Find all scaled versions of the base image and verify their sizes.
+      for i in range(1, len(self.paths)):
+        image_path = self.input_api.os_path.join(self.paths[i][1], f)
+        if not os.path.exists(image_path):
+          continue
+        # Ensure that each image for a particular scale factor is the
+        # correct scale of the base image.
+        exp_width, exp_height = ExpectedSize(base_width, base_height,
+            self.paths[i][0])
+        width, height = Image.open(open(image_path)).size
+        if width != exp_width or height != exp_height:
+          results.append(self.output_api.PresubmitError(
+              'Image %s is %dx%d, expected to be %dx%d' % (
+              self.input_api.os_path.join(repository_path, image_path),
+              width, height, exp_width, exp_height)))
+    return results