Refactor the gypi files to eliminate some redundancy.

Refactor the gypi files to eliminate some redundancy.
Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=1999

[Ivan Posva, 2011-12-01 22:19:31]

LGTM after simplifications.

-Ivan

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi
File bin/bin.gypi (left):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi#oldcode320
bin/bin.gypi:320: ['include', 'dart_api_impl.cc'],
Great cleanup!

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi
File bin/bin.gypi (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi#newcode24
bin/bin.gypi:24: 'builtin.dart',
We should add those to the builtin_sources.gypi file instead.

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi#newcode80
bin/bin.gypi:80: 'bin_sources.gypi',
builtin_sources.gypi? bin_sources I would expect to contain main.cc and similar.

[siva, 2011-12-01 23:03:25]

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi
File bin/bin.gypi (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi#newcode24
bin/bin.gypi:24: 'builtin.dart',
On 2011/12/01 22:19:31, Ivan Posva wrote:
> We should add those to the builtin_sources.gypi file instead.

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/8772016/diff/1/bin/bin.gypi#newcode80
bin/bin.gypi:80: 'bin_sources.gypi',
On 2011/12/01 22:19:31, Ivan Posva wrote:
> builtin_sources.gypi? bin_sources I would expect to contain main.cc and
similar.

Done.