Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(189)

Issue 8591025: Fix parsing of factory calls (issue 500). (Closed)

Created:
9 years, 1 month ago by regis
Modified:
9 years, 1 month ago
Reviewers:
srdjan
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix parsing of factory calls (issue 500). Add test. Fix test. Adjust co19 status file. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=1633

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Patch Set 3 : '' #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+83 lines, -19 lines) Patch
M runtime/vm/parser.cc View 1 2 6 chunks +32 lines, -18 lines 0 comments Download
M tests/co19/co19-runtime.status View 1 2 1 chunk +6 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tests/language/src/Factory2Test.dart View 1 chunk +44 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M tests/language/src/SavannahTest.dart View 1 2 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3 (0 generated)
regis
Thanks to Peter for the bug report and test.
9 years, 1 month ago (2011-11-17 20:41:13 UTC) #1
srdjan
LGTM with one question about disabled tests. http://codereview.chromium.org/8591025/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-runtime.status File tests/co19/co19-runtime.status (right): http://codereview.chromium.org/8591025/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-runtime.status#newcode253 tests/co19/co19-runtime.status:253: LangSpecTest/13_Types/13_4_Interface_Types/A07/t03: Fail ...
9 years, 1 month ago (2011-11-17 21:06:10 UTC) #2
regis
9 years, 1 month ago (2011-11-17 21:40:26 UTC) #3
Thanks

http://codereview.chromium.org/8591025/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-runtime.status
File tests/co19/co19-runtime.status (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8591025/diff/1/tests/co19/co19-runtime.status#...
tests/co19/co19-runtime.status:253:
LangSpecTest/13_Types/13_4_Interface_Types/A07/t03: Fail # Issue 441
On 2011/11/17 21:06:10, srdjan wrote:
> Why issue 441? (Type check error thrown too early)
> 
> I think you need to file a new co19 issue, saying that the values must
implement
> Hashable?

Good point. This one is different. Filed co19 issue 53.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698